Quantcast

Is Barrack Obama a Closet Communist?

Sasha 2008/08/06 15:24:48
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Just as Cuba is moving away from communism, are we here in America moving closer to it? It could well be. It turns out that Barry Hussein Osama may well be a hard-core communist sympathizer, if not an outright commie, who should, if he were honest (and not a dirty plagiarist), be running for President as the Communist Party candidate.
In his biography of Barack Obama, David Mendell writes about Obama’s life as a “secret smoker” and how he “went to great lengths to conceal the habit.” But what about Obama’s secret political life? It turns out that Obama’s childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was a communist.

And just who is this Frank Davis guy? Fifth column commie scum.

Davis was a known communist who belonged to a party subservient to the Soviet Union. In fact, the 1951 report of the Commission on Subversive Activities to the Legislature of the Territory of Hawaii identified him as a CPUSA member. What’s more, anti-communist congressional committees, including the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), accused Davis of involvement in several communist-front organizations.

And just who is Barack Obama? It seems that not even his hardcore leftist supporters know, or even want to. Being unquestioning lemmings, willing to hurl themselves over the cliff for their party, they unthinkingly support the Magical Unity Pony, even though they have no idea why.

Obama’s communist connection adds to mounting public concern about a candidate who has come out of virtually nowhere, with a brief U.S. Senate legislative record, to become the Democratic Party frontrunner for the U.S. presidency. In the latest Real Clear Politics poll average, Obama beats Republican John McCain by almost four percentage points.

And don’t think that just because the Soviet Union was defeated by Ronald Reagan back in the 1980s means that communism is gone forever. The snakes and zombies will stop at nothing to undermine America, even still.

But the Communist Party connection through Davis is even more ominous. Decades ago, the CPUSA had tens of thousands of members, some of them covert agents who had penetrated the U.S. Government. It received secret subsidies from the old Soviet Union.

People need to find out more the truth about Obama before we put this committed socialist and likely communist in control of our great homeland. Think about it. Capitalism or socialism/communism: which do you choose?

Be sure to read the whole thing, published by the objective
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • [PRISONMOON]+[RSSH] 2008/08/12 01:42:53 (edited)
    Yes
    [PRISONMOON]+[RSSH]
    +13
    I've been saying this since day one ! he walked in pure as the driven snow, and the Obamedia presented him as untouched and no past to haunt him, and it just seemed to me that this guy came out of NOWHERE and suddenly he is a SUPERSTAR, and anything that might tarnish this mans
    reputation has been BURIED DEEP by the Obamedia and then they redirect back to McCain.

    beware of this man Americans..beware of this man....

    I was taught from a very young child to not ever trust any stranger that
    comes off as too friendly and promising the world on a platter.

    America, please wake up..this is not paranoid chatter..this is my true feelings, not partisan, true feelings.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Nozzghoull 2009/04/15 14:15:38
    Yes
    Nozzghoull
    I don't think he's hiding anything....he's pretty much doing what I thought he'd do.
  • LA-Certified 2009/03/28 07:00:04
    Yes
    LA-Certified
    +1
    Absolutely, but I don't think he was ever in the closet.
  • Jeb 2009/03/06 02:35:46
    Undecided
    Jeb
    +1
    At age 73, I have never feared any man elected for president in the
    United States until now ! His policys will destroy freedom in America.
    Excessive spending, high taxes and pandering to those who wish us ill
    is a great recipe..................for disaster. Trillions of dollars have already been lost by common americans because of the fear many
    people have. His policys smell like communism.
  • Larson Whipsnade 2009/02/14 11:10:02
    No
    Larson Whipsnade
    +1
    closet? I think he's out of the closet.
  • mamawvicky 2009/01/18 15:25:59
    No
    mamawvicky
    No,and hell no.these stupid questions have to come from one of the 3%,that still love Bush.
  • BLACK PARIS 2009/01/14 01:17:59
    No
    BLACK PARIS
    This is so stupid!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • max 2008/10/29 15:25:28
    Yes
    max
    +2
    Obama’s record for openness gets an "F" grade.


    During the heated Democratic primary, Obama complained of the Bush White House being “one of the most secretive administrations in our history” and chided Sen. Hillary Clinton for not releasing her White House schedules.


    Ironically, Obama, just days away from possibly being elected president, continues to stonewall a growing chorus of information requests for documents about his legislative, personal health, education, financing, and background -- leaving many voters to cast ballots based on incomplete information.


    And serious questions about his past continue to swirl as Election Day looms, fueled in part by his own campaign’s refusal to make relevant documents available.


    And the press, usually banging at the door for candidates to make “full disclosure” is strangely quiet about Obama’s stonewalling.


    A Newsmax survey of key Obama aspects of Obama’s public and private life continued to be shielded from the public.


    Among the examples:



    Obama has released just one brief document detailing his personal health. McCain, on the other hands, released what he said was his complete medical file totaling more than 1500 pages. After criticism on the matter, last week the Obama campaign also released some routine lab-test r...






































    Obama’s record for openness gets an "F" grade.


    During the heated Democratic primary, Obama complained of the Bush White House being “one of the most secretive administrations in our history” and chided Sen. Hillary Clinton for not releasing her White House schedules.


    Ironically, Obama, just days away from possibly being elected president, continues to stonewall a growing chorus of information requests for documents about his legislative, personal health, education, financing, and background -- leaving many voters to cast ballots based on incomplete information.


    And serious questions about his past continue to swirl as Election Day looms, fueled in part by his own campaign’s refusal to make relevant documents available.


    And the press, usually banging at the door for candidates to make “full disclosure” is strangely quiet about Obama’s stonewalling.


    A Newsmax survey of key Obama aspects of Obama’s public and private life continued to be shielded from the public.


    Among the examples:



    Obama has released just one brief document detailing his personal health. McCain, on the other hands, released what he said was his complete medical file totaling more than 1500 pages. After criticism on the matter, last week the Obama campaign also released some routine lab-test results and electrocardiograms for Obama. All test results appeared normal, but many details about his health remain a mystery.



    Obama has refused to offer his official papers as a state legislator in Illinois, and has been unable to produce correspondence, such as letters from lobbyists and other correspondence from his days in the Illinois state senate. There are also no appointment calendars available of his official activities. “It could have been thrown out,” Obama said while on the campaign trail during the Democratic primary. “I haven’t been in the state Senate now for quite some time.”



    Obama has not released his client list as an attorney or his billing records. Obama has maintained that he only performed a few hours of legal work for a nonprofit organization with ties to Tony Rezko, the Chicago businessman convicted of fraud in June. But he has not released billing records that would prove this assertion.



    Obama won’t release his college records from Occidental College where he studied for two years before transferring to Columbia.



    Obama’s campaign refuses to give Columbia University, where he earned an undergraduate degree in political science, permission to release his transcripts. Such transcripts would list the courses Obama took, and his grades. President George W. Bush, and presidential contenders Al Gore and John Kerry, all released their college transcripts. (McCain has refused to release his Naval Academy transcript.)




    Obama’s college dissertation has simply disappeared from Columbia Universities archives. In July, in response to a flurry of requests to review Obama’s senior thesis at the Ivy League school, reportedly titled “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament,” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt told NBC News “We do not have a copy of the course paper you requested and neither does Columbia University.”



    The senator has not agreed to the release of his application to the Illinois state bar, which would clear up intermittent allegations that his application to the bar may have been inaccurate.



    Jim Geraghty of the National Review has written extensively about Obama’s unwillingness to release records related to clients he represented while he was an attorney with the Chicago law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill, and Gallard. Obama was required to list his clients during his years in the Illinois senate. “Obama listed every client of the firm,” Geraghty reported, making it impossible to discern which clients he represented.



    Obama has never released records from his time at Harvard Law School.



    Obama also has not disclosed the names of small donors giving $200 or less to his campaign. An exception to the finance-reporting laws exempts the campaign from reporting those who donate less than $200, but that law never envisioned the more than $300 million that has been raised by Obama in small amounts. The Republican National Committee has released its small donors, as well as McCain’s, on a public database.

    OBAMA IS A LIAR AND A SNAKE. HE CANNOT BE TRUSTED.
    (more)
  • unicorn66 2008/10/29 15:24:26
    Undecided
    unicorn66
    That's not half of the problem!

    http://www.faithfreedom.org/o...
  • Broadsword 2008/10/29 05:05:10
    Yes
    Broadsword
    +3
    But we see no closet... he is out in the open with his socialism and Marxist followings. If elected, prepare to impeach.
  • Terry1984 2008/10/25 04:08:54
    Yes
    Terry1984
    +1
    He's really not even trying very hard to hide it. He knows he has the black vote even if he stood up there and promised to bring back segregation. The only thing that would turn the vote from him is if he said he was going to stop foodstamps and welfare.
  • dony ''In God We Trust'' 2008/10/25 01:49:15
    Yes
    dony ''In God We Trust''
    +3
    but liberals r 2 stupid 2 notice
  • Yes
    ღ✞☮ νєяσηιcα ღ✞☮
    +2
    Oligarchy is more like it.
  • Latino01 2008/10/24 22:30:21
    Yes
    Latino01
    +2
    The 666 candidate for the Anti Christ title is bringing down the world through his well positioned crony followers in key positions globally to after wards offer his flock of followers a new beginning based on his pie in the sky philosophy. World domination is his goal.


    Mccain/Palin 08 PUMA and fly Navy
  • Divided States of America 2008/10/11 04:07:20
    Undecided
    Divided States of America
    Communist isn't a bad word.Communism [as you know it]has been abused by it's leaders.Same as capitalism to other parts of the world.If you didn't know the commy princible,is that they are all equal, basicly make the same,and all have jobs.Government controls everything to aviod 700 billon dollar bail outs of incompetent companies.
  • Broadsword Divided... 2008/10/29 05:07:52
    Broadsword
    But no nation has had perfect communism, they are dictatorships clear and simple. With a rigid class structure of the few haves and the many of have nots. It is a horrible life. Do not confuse the 700 billion bailout with total government control.
  • Wackiekat 2008/10/05 23:46:28
    Yes
    Wackiekat
    +3
    Wake up, America!! Do the research!! This man is DANGEROUS!!
  • steelbill Wackiekat 2008/10/27 19:58:10
    steelbill
    +1
    The connection to Frank Marshall Davis may be more than just share views they may share DNA. If you look at pictures of Obama senior and Frank Marshall Davis and compare them to Obamas the resemblance to Frank Marshall Davis is striking. He looks absolutley nothing like Obama senior.
  • Terri3G... steelbill 2009/04/15 14:08:36
    Terri3GS..Allergic to Stupidity.
    +1
    THANK YOU..I KEEP TELLING PEEPS THIS AND THEY DON'T WANNA LISTEN.
  • Mark 2008/08/18 21:07:14
    Undecided
    Mark
    +3
    it is starting to look like that may be the case.
  • Janie 2008/08/18 00:41:00
    Undecided
    Janie
    +6
    I don't know who Obama is and really don't want to know. I just want him to go away.
  • Sasha Janie 2008/08/18 20:53:53
    Sasha
    +4
    Me too.
  • Skunk " In God We Trust" 2008/08/16 17:27:20
    No
    Skunk  " In God We Trust"
    +3
    He is in your face Marxist/Commie.Eventhough he would probably deny it.
  • TheRichZone 2008/08/15 05:31:11
    Yes
    TheRichZone
    +4
    Change we can't believe in

    change
  • Docstrich 2008/08/15 05:16:50 (edited)
    Yes
    Docstrich
    +3
    YA THINK?
    PUMA
    Photobucket
  • sktdriver77 PROUD RIGHT WIN... 2008/08/14 22:31:34
    No
    sktdriver77 PROUD RIGHT WING EXTREMIST
    +5
    No...a closet muslim......who will show his fangs the day after he(GOD help us all) is sworn in on the quaran as our president......hell on earth is coming America....sharia law will be instituted and obeyed or they will kill us..simple as that....Wake up America...before it's too late
  • Jelly Bean sktdriv... 2008/10/06 19:36:23
    Jelly Bean
    +2
    The end may be nearer that you think.

    Religious groups and free-speech advocates are banding together to fight a United Nations resolution they say is being used to spread Sharia law to the Western world and to intimidate anyone who criticizes Islam.

    The non-binding resolution on “Combating the Defamation of Religion” is intended to curtail speech that offends religion -- particularly Islam.

    Pakistan and the Organization of the Islamic Conference introduced the measure to the U.N. Human Rights Council in 1999. It was amended to include religions other than Islam, and it has passed every year since.

    In 2005, Yemen successfully brought a similar resolution before the General Assembly. Now the 192-nation Assembly is set to vote on it again.

    The non-binding Resolution 62/145, which was adopted in 2007, says it “notes with deep concern the intensification of the campaign of defamation of religions and the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of 11 September 2001.”

    It “stresses the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions and incitement to religious hatred, against Islam and Muslims in particular.”

    But some critics believe the resolution is a dangerous threat to freedom of speech everywhere.

    The U.S. government mission in Geneva, in a statement,...

    ""
    The end may be nearer that you think.

    Religious groups and free-speech advocates are banding together to fight a United Nations resolution they say is being used to spread Sharia law to the Western world and to intimidate anyone who criticizes Islam.

    The non-binding resolution on “Combating the Defamation of Religion” is intended to curtail speech that offends religion -- particularly Islam.

    Pakistan and the Organization of the Islamic Conference introduced the measure to the U.N. Human Rights Council in 1999. It was amended to include religions other than Islam, and it has passed every year since.

    In 2005, Yemen successfully brought a similar resolution before the General Assembly. Now the 192-nation Assembly is set to vote on it again.

    The non-binding Resolution 62/145, which was adopted in 2007, says it “notes with deep concern the intensification of the campaign of defamation of religions and the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of 11 September 2001.”

    It “stresses the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions and incitement to religious hatred, against Islam and Muslims in particular.”

    But some critics believe the resolution is a dangerous threat to freedom of speech everywhere.

    The U.S. government mission in Geneva, in a statement, told the U.N. Human Rights Council in July that “defamation-related laws have been abused by governments and used to restrict human rights” around the world, and sometimes Westerners have been caught in the web.

    Critics give some recent news events as examples of how the U.N. "blasphemy resolution" has emboldened Islamic authorities and threatened Westerners:
    (more)
  • rezzerected 2008/08/14 18:42:31 (edited)
  • Skunk ... rezzere... 2008/08/16 17:28:55
    Skunk  " In God We Trust"
    +2
    What is he then?
  • max Skunk ... 2008/10/29 15:30:41
    max
    +2
    A Liar, A Snake, Unamerican, Unpatriotic, Evil, A Deciever, A Racist, and the list goes on and on and on. Take your pick.
  • Skunk ... max 2008/10/30 01:31:47
    Skunk  " In God We Trust"
    +1
    MAX! Touche.
  • Terri3G... Skunk ... 2009/04/15 14:09:47
    Terri3GS..Allergic to Stupidity.
    +1
    That is the Million Dollar question.
  • tess 2008/08/14 18:33:43
    Yes
    tess
    +6
    Unfortunately, it looks more and more like he is.
  • mikebyrd 2008/08/14 14:56:15
  • Joe 2008/08/13 14:15:22 (edited)
    No
    Joe
    +3
    I dont think he is communist. I think he is just a red blooded all americian dumb ass.
  • Sasha Joe 2008/08/13 23:14:32
    Sasha
    +3
    LOL. Very cute.
  • GLO Sasha 2008/08/14 01:35:55 (edited)
  • Janie Joe 2008/08/18 00:42:57
    Janie
    +1
    I agree w/everything you said except all american.
  • m 2008/08/13 03:30:26
    Yes
    m
    +5
    He is not a closet communist. He is pretty open about his ideas take from the rich give to the poor in 3rd world countries.
  • diaverde08-AmericanKilljoy 2008/08/13 01:52:06
    No
    diaverde08-AmericanKilljoy
    Get off the "commie scum" charade. Sure, Obama may be inconsistent and plans on imposing high taxes, but don't accuse him of that marxism stuff. I, personaly, don't support either candidate, which has allowed me to look at both candidates from an unbiased view, so don't think i'm saying this in defense of Obama. I'm just saying, this is a bit overboard. If you want to criticize him for his inconsistencies and his not having a real plan for either Iraq or the oil prices, then do so. As a matter of fact, that's what we should be doing. Same for McCain. He himself, as far as i know, has offered no plan for health care or maintanence of our forein reputation, and his plan for Iraq is to stay 100 years or more. I think people should be reasonably skepticle of both candidates. This is not what i call being "reasonable".
  • Sasha diaverd... 2008/08/13 22:17:15
    Sasha
    +5
    Thanks for your reply. But his associations with rather colorful people leaves many questions to yet be answered, in regards to Barack Obama. His ideals are so far to the left that they do mirror socialiam.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/04/18 05:48:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals