Blogs Wilson ~It's Our Year!!'s
WMD's found in Iraq. Pres. Bush did NOT lie.
- November 17, 2008 16:31:11
- Read all 115 comments
- +11 / -1 raves
For verification of this information, click on these links:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm
A national defense analyst says President Bush should be commended for keeping quiet about a discovery that could have blown his critics out of the water.
Retired Major General Jerry Curry is a decorated combat veteran who
served as an Army aviator, paratrooper, and Ranger during a military
career that began during the Korean conflict. He recently wrote about a
very under reported story by the Associated Press.
According to the report, a large stockpile of concentrated natural
Uranium, known as "yellowcake," reached a Canadian port to complete a top secret U.S. Operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad, and a ship voyage crossing two oceans. The Uranium material had been housed at a former Iraqi nuclear complex 12 miles from Baghdad.
Curry says the president kept mum about the discovery in order to keep terrorists in the dark. "He made a very brave stand, a resolute
stand..., in which he decided that he wasn't going to blab everything to
the press," Curry commends. "...And in the meantime while he kept it
quiet, he was buying time from the terrorists to get all that stuff out
of the country. So that's what was done -- he just very quietly kept his
mouth shut."
"The press beat him to death for the last several years," he continues, "and now it turns out that, yes, there were weapons of mass destruction ...." Curry also maintains that Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear program and the material could have been made into a nuclear weapon.
President Bush's actions took courage, he notes, and all Americans
should be thankful to have such a brave president who puts the welfare
of the American people above personal considerations.
On July 5, 2008, the Associated Press (AP) released a story titled:
Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq. The opening paragraph is as follows:
The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program (a huge
stockpile of concentrated natural uranium) reached a Canadian port
Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week
airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
See anything wrong with this picture?
We have been hearing from the far left for more than five years how Bush lied. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.
It appears that American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium in
2003 after invading Iraq. They had to sit on this information and the
uranium itself for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It was
guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site with large
sand berms surrounding the site.
This is vindication for the Bush administration, having been attacked
mercilessly by the liberal media and the far-left pundits on the
blogo-sphere. Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie
about Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think that the mainstream media would report the true story. Once the AP released the story, the mainstream media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide.
That never happened, due in large part, I believe, to the fact that the
mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, "The
removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake, the seed material for
higher-grade nuclear enrichment, was a significant step toward closing
the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy."
Closing the book on Saddam's nuclear legacy? Did Saddam have a nuclear legacy after all? I thought Bush lied? As it turns out, the people who lied were Joe Wilson and his wife.
Valerie Plame engaged in a clear case of nepotism and convinced the CIA to send her husband on a fact finding mission in February 2002, seeking to determine if Saddam Hussein attempted to buy yellowcake from Niger.
The CIA and British intelligence believed Saddam contacted Niger for
that purpose but needed proof.
During his trip to Niger, Wilson actually interviewed the former prime
minister of Niger, Ibrahim Assane Mayaki. Mayaki told Wilson that in
June of 1999, an Iraqi delegation expressed interest in "expanding
commercial relations" for the purposes of purchasing yellowcake.
Wilson chose to overlook Mahaki's remarks and reported to the CIA that there was no evidence of Hussein wanting to purchase yellow cake from Niger.
However, with British intelligence insisting the claim was true,
President Bush used that same claim in his State of the Union address in January of 2003. Outraged by Bush's insistence that the claim was true, Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times in the summer of 2003 slamming Bush.
Wilson did this in spite of the fact that Mayaki said Saddam did try to
buy the yellowcake from Niger. The Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence disagreed with Wilson and supported Mayaki's claim. This
meant nothing to Wilson who was opposed to the Iraq war and thus had
ulterior motives in covering up the prime minister's statements.
It was a simple tactic, really. If the far-left and their friends in the
media could prove Bush lied about Hussein wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger, it would undermine President Bush's credibility and give them more cause for asking what other lies he may have told.
Yet the real lie came from Wilson, who interpreted his own meaning from the prime minister's statements and concluded all by himself that the claim of Saddam attempting to purchase yellowcake was "unequivocally wrong."
Curiously the CIA sat on this information and did not inform the CIA
Director, who sided with Bush on the yellowcake claim. This was made
public in a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report in July
2004.
Valerie Plame also engaged in her own lie campaign by spreading the
notion that the Bush Administration outed her as a CIA agent. Never mind that it was Richard Armitage - no friend of the Bush administration - who leaked Plame's identity to the press. Never mind that Plame had not been in the field as a CIA agent in some six years.
The truth is, due to their opposition to the war, Joe Wilson, Valerie
Plame, the mainstream media, and their left-wing friends on the
blogo-sphere engaged in a propaganda campaign to undermine the Bush administration. Now that Saddam's uranium has been made public and is no longer a threat to the world, do you think these aforementioned parties will apologize and admit they were wrong?
Don't count on it.
The rest of the American people should hear the truth about Saddam's
uranium. It is up to you and me to inform them.
As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that
Bush lied, we should tell them to "have the yellowcake and eat it
too."
For verification of this information, click on this link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm
A national defense analyst says President Bush should be commended for keeping quiet about a discovery that could have blown his critics out of the water.
Retired Major General Jerry Curry is a decorated combat veteran who
served as an Army aviator, paratrooper, and Ranger during a military
career that began during the Korean conflict. He recently wrote about a
very under reported story by the Associated Press.
According to the report, a large stockpile of concentrated natural
Uranium, known as "yellowcake," reached a Canadian port to complete a top secret U.S. Operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad, and a ship voyage crossing two oceans. The Uranium material had been housed at a former Iraqi nuclear complex 12 miles from Baghdad.
Curry says the president kept mum about the discovery in order to keep terrorists in the dark. "He made a very brave stand, a resolute
stand..., in which he decided that he wasn't going to blab everything to
the press," Curry commends. "...And in the meantime while he kept it
quiet, he was buying time from the terrorists to get all that stuff out
of the country. So that's what was done -- he just very quietly kept his
mouth shut."
"The press beat him to death for the last several years," he continues, "and now it turns out that, yes, there were weapons of mass destruction ...." Curry also maintains that Saddam Hussein had an active nuclear program and the material could have been made into a nuclear weapon.
President Bush's actions took courage, he notes, and all Americans
should be thankful to have such a brave president who puts the welfare
of the American people above personal considerations.
On July 5, 2008, the Associated Press (AP) released a story titled:
Secret U.S. mission hauls uranium from Iraq. The opening paragraph is as follows:
The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program (a huge
stockpile of concentrated natural uranium) reached a Canadian port
Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week
airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
See anything wrong with this picture?
We have been hearing from the far left for more than five years how Bush lied. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.
It appears that American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium in
2003 after invading Iraq. They had to sit on this information and the
uranium itself for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It was
guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site with large
sand berms surrounding the site.
This is vindication for the Bush administration, having been attacked
mercilessly by the liberal media and the far-left pundits on the
blogo-sphere. Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie
about Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think that the mainstream media would report the true story. Once the AP released the story, the mainstream media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide.
That never happened, due in large part, I believe, to the fact that the
mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, "The
removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake, the seed material for
higher-grade nuclear enrichment, was a significant step toward closing
the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy."
Closing the book on Saddam's nuclear legacy? Did Saddam have a nuclear legacy after all? I thought Bush lied? As it turns out, the people who lied were Joe Wilson and his wife.
Valerie Plame engaged in a clear case of nepotism and convinced the CIA to send her husband on a fact finding mission in February 2002, seeking to determine if Saddam Hussein attempted to buy yellowcake from Niger.
The CIA and British intelligence believed Saddam contacted Niger for
that purpose but needed proof.
During his trip to Niger, Wilson actually interviewed the former prime
minister of Niger, Ibrahim Assane Mayaki. Mayaki told Wilson that in
June of 1999, an Iraqi delegation expressed interest in "expanding
commercial relations" for the purposes of purchasing yellowcake.
Wilson chose to overlook Mahaki's remarks and reported to the CIA that there was no evidence of Hussein wanting to purchase yellow cake from Niger.
However, with British intelligence insisting the claim was true,
President Bush used that same claim in his State of the Union address in January of 2003. Outraged by Bush's insistence that the claim was true, Wilson wrote an op-ed in the New York Times in the summer of 2003 slamming Bush.
Wilson did this in spite of the fact that Mayaki said Saddam did try to
buy the yellowcake from Niger. The Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence disagreed with Wilson and supported Mayaki's claim. This
meant nothing to Wilson who was opposed to the Iraq war and thus had
ulterior motives in covering up the prime minister's statements.
It was a simple tactic, really. If the far-left and their friends in the
media could prove Bush lied about Hussein wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger, it would undermine President Bush's credibility and give them more cause for asking what other lies he may have told.
Yet the real lie came from Wilson, who interpreted his own meaning from the prime minister's statements and concluded all by himself that the claim of Saddam attempting to purchase yellowcake was "unequivocally wrong."
Curiously the CIA sat on this information and did not inform the CIA
Director, who sided with Bush on the yellowcake claim. This was made
public in a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report in July
2004.
Valerie Plame also engaged in her own lie campaign by spreading the
notion that the Bush Administration outed her as a CIA agent. Never mind that it was Richard Armitage - no friend of the Bush administration - who leaked Plame's identity to the press. Never mind that Plame had not been in the field as a CIA agent in some six years.
The truth is, due to their opposition to the war, Joe Wilson, Valerie
Plame, the mainstream media, and their left-wing friends on the
blogo-sphere engaged in a propaganda campaign to undermine the Bush administration. Now that Saddam's uranium has been made public and is no longer a threat to the world, do you think these aforementioned parties will apologize and admit they were wrong?
Don't count on it.
The rest of the American people should hear the truth about Saddam's
uranium. It is up to you and me to inform them.
As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that
Bush lied, we should tell them to "have the yellowcake and eat it
too."
For verification of this information, click on this link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm
Top Comment
-
I'm not surprised, President Bush cares about his country more than he cares what everyone thinks about him.View thread
About Me
Recent Posts
Hot on SodaHead






Fontova (2007) --- A few highlights: Che relished ordering prisoners shot; he never
led a successful military operation but botched several badly; one of his first posts
under Castro was as chief of "security" where he could indulge his psycho-pathologically twisted sadism, and Fidel Castro eventually maneuvered Guevara
(who was no "doctor," either) to Bolivia where the peasants had no use for this
Argentine nut-job and he ended up meeting his demise. But when you take all the
many other facts in Fontova's scholarly but very scathing expose and put them up against that iconic image of the romanticized "freedom fighter, " people who have NO
knowledge of any of this are liable to believe the despicably stupid myth. The book is
widely available and found in any large public library, at least here in Minneapolis.
Verbum sapientum.
Wrong !!! lol
‘I believe, to the fact that the mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, 'The removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake, the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment, was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.’
And what exactly does qualify as news? I couldn’t care less if Madonna and Ritchie’s marriage is on the rocks, if Lindsay Lohan is in or out of rehab, if Paris Hilton and Madden are hooking up, or Brittney continues her self destructive behavior, or if Leonardo DiCaprio is now ONCE AGAIN proud to be an American now that his candidate (Obama) has been elected President. This is the rubbish they...
‘I believe, to the fact that the mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, 'The removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake, the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment, was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.’
And what exactly does qualify as news? I couldn’t care less if Madonna and Ritchie’s marriage is on the rocks, if Lindsay Lohan is in or out of rehab, if Paris Hilton and Madden are hooking up, or Brittney continues her self destructive behavior, or if Leonardo DiCaprio is now ONCE AGAIN proud to be an American now that his candidate (Obama) has been elected President. This is the rubbish they throw at us.
There was a time when the media just reported the news and let us decide for ourselves what the truth is. Unfortunately those days are over.
And the housing bubble that clinton deregulated popped on bush like they said it would.
Why does no one get that small little fact??????
TheU.N. have been guarding it. Why the hell didn't they get it the hell out of there? It was left there, under guard, and Bush couldn't say a thing about it in case it fell into the wrong hands!
He could have been selfish and cleared his name, and others who knew about it could have cleared his name...but they didn't! It's obviously part of a bigger picture than we are allowed to be privy to, and G.W. has taken the fall for this one.
Wrong ! lol
"In nine months, arms control experts in Iraq have failed to find a single item from a long list of weapons of mass destruction. The Bush administration cited an alleged weapons stockpile in Iraq as a primary reason for launching the war against Saddam's government."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/...
Are you still spreading stupidity? The last post I sent to you was the following. Your reply to me was again quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post, thinking you were quoting GWB. Unless you have something interesting to say and can read and comment on my endless facts to you, I don't have time to educate you now. Good luck to you.
"Let’s get this straight:
- You started off stating that Bush was a war criminal and Bush lied. Then you put forth several quotes thinking you were quoting Bush but you were really quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post. Bush never made any of those statements. You never responded to that.
- You have no problem with any and all liberals and the United Nations making claims about weapons of mass destruction, but have a problem if Bush makes the same claims. You never responded to that.
- Then you ask where the WMDs are and I give you 500 metric tones. You responded “There were simply no weapons of mass destruction.” If it wasn’t an issue why was it kept a secret for years from everyone?
- Then you wrote, “you made up that no data to support the Yellow cake claim". Then I show you the proof. As the video stated, “when I heard about the yellowcake claim, we were going to war in Iraq.” You never responded to tha...'"'
Are you still spreading stupidity? The last post I sent to you was the following. Your reply to me was again quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post, thinking you were quoting GWB. Unless you have something interesting to say and can read and comment on my endless facts to you, I don't have time to educate you now. Good luck to you.
"Let’s get this straight:
- You started off stating that Bush was a war criminal and Bush lied. Then you put forth several quotes thinking you were quoting Bush but you were really quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post. Bush never made any of those statements. You never responded to that.
- You have no problem with any and all liberals and the United Nations making claims about weapons of mass destruction, but have a problem if Bush makes the same claims. You never responded to that.
- Then you ask where the WMDs are and I give you 500 metric tones. You responded “There were simply no weapons of mass destruction.” If it wasn’t an issue why was it kept a secret for years from everyone?
- Then you wrote, “you made up that no data to support the Yellow cake claim". Then I show you the proof. As the video stated, “when I heard about the yellowcake claim, we were going to war in Iraq.” You never responded to that.
I have answered every argument you had with the facts. You have answered me back with absolutely nothing. A good argument isn't simply saying bullshit, BS, Bush is a liar and a war criminal. You really have no logical argument. That’s ok, that is what the First Amendment is all about :)"
Don't forget the First Amendment gives you the right to speak, NOT THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD!
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
Are you still spreading stupidity? The last post I sent to you was the following. Your reply to me was again quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post, thinking you were quoting GWB. Unless you have something interesting to say and can read and comment on my endless facts to you, I don't have time to educate you now. Good luck to you.
"Let’s get this straight:
- You started off stating that Bush was a war criminal and Bush lied. Then you put forth several quotes thinking you were quoting Bush but you were really quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post. Bush never made any of those statements. You never responded to that.
- You have no problem with any and all liberals and the United Nations making claims about weapons of mass destruction, but have a problem if Bush makes the same claims. You never responded to that.
- Then you ask where the WMDs are and I give you 500 metric tones. You responded “There were simply no weapons of mass destruction.” If it wasn’t an issue why was it kept a secret for years from everyone?
- Then you wrote, “you made up that no data to support the Yellow cake claim". Then I show you the proof. As the video stated, “when I heard about the yellowcake claim, we were going to war in Iraq.” You never responded to tha...'"'
Are you still spreading stupidity? The last post I sent to you was the following. Your reply to me was again quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post, thinking you were quoting GWB. Unless you have something interesting to say and can read and comment on my endless facts to you, I don't have time to educate you now. Good luck to you.
"Let’s get this straight:
- You started off stating that Bush was a war criminal and Bush lied. Then you put forth several quotes thinking you were quoting Bush but you were really quoting Glenn Kessler from the Washington Post. Bush never made any of those statements. You never responded to that.
- You have no problem with any and all liberals and the United Nations making claims about weapons of mass destruction, but have a problem if Bush makes the same claims. You never responded to that.
- Then you ask where the WMDs are and I give you 500 metric tones. You responded “There were simply no weapons of mass destruction.” If it wasn’t an issue why was it kept a secret for years from everyone?
- Then you wrote, “you made up that no data to support the Yellow cake claim". Then I show you the proof. As the video stated, “when I heard about the yellowcake claim, we were going to war in Iraq.” You never responded to that.
I have answered every argument you had with the facts. You have answered me back with absolutely nothing. A good argument isn't simply saying bullshit, BS, Bush is a liar and a war criminal. You really have no logical argument. That’s ok, that is what the First Amendment is all about :)"
Don't forget the First Amendment gives you the right to speak, NOT THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD!
http://www.snopes.com/politic...
If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or, being hated, don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise;
Yours is the Earth and everything that's in it,
And - which is more - you'll be a Man my son!
-- Rudyard Kipling
Why dont you just back us instead of bitch and moan and whine?