I'm listening to music. Where is the text version of this guy's comments? Faster (to read), searchable, smaller (file size), and indexable.

Note/Edit:
Sorry that the text below is all grouped together. It will appear correctly if you click the "More" link. It seems this site breaks blockquotes if it truncates your content.

A MONSTER as Darwin, who will always live in INFAMY as one of the World's most despicable MURDERERS

You're attributing a bunch of people's actions (that were not his actions) as things he is responsible for. People are responsible for their own actions. By your logic, the person who invented bullets is a horrible, horrible butcher responsible for many of the causalities of the World Wars (among many, many others).

Darwin hated his terrible monstrosity of a father! Darwin was a medical school drop-out! Darwin failed at ministry!

What does this have to do with Evolution being wrong? Attack the message, not the messenger (argumentum ad hominem). Having a bad father or failing at ministry are completely irrelevant to someone's scientific credentials. I would argue the medical claim is pushing it too. One can be a good biologist, but bad at medicine.

Evolution is merely political Spin-Doctoring by a man whose failing mentality wanted desperately to turn his life of failures into some sort of success.

A few failures mentioned above do not consitute a "life of failures". The supporting evidence for the claim made is lacking. We all have a few failures in our life, but that doesn't make our lives a "life of failure". Furthermore, your claim of "spin-doctoring" implies he introduced some sort of bias or slant. I'm not sure why you would think that, and I'm not sure why you would think someone you've never met has a "failing mindset (mentality)" given what you've presented.

Hitler read Darwin and decided that the Jewish race should be exterminated!

That's kind of dubius. Hitler hated Jews and the Jewish race. To him, they "poisoned" the rest of the pure "Aryans". Jewish doctors wanted to harm Germans. Jewish lawyers cheated the "Goyim" out of property and money. Jews would kidnap German children and sacrifice them. They were what was wrong with society. Social darwinism (a mis-application of Darwin's "survival of the fittest" idea to places where it doesn't belong) seems like it was just a tool in his arsenal to justify the "Final Solution", though if Jews were supposedly swindling the Germans (they weren't) then it seems that the Jews were the fittest and that this was more of a artificial selection by a weaker group rather than some sort of natural selection.

Modern atheists laud Darwin as a saint!

The irreligious don't have saints. Science doesn't have saints. Some of them made very important discoveries in their lives (for their time), but that doesn't mean that we take what they say as gospel or believe them to be holy. For instance, Newton was wrong about a lot of things (like alchemy and astronomy).

The man who creates a corollary that results in others using said corollary to kill vast numbers of people becomes complicit in the very deaths that the idea caused.

Take for instance the Godwin Regime in Germany back during the WWs. The stubby-stashed Mike Godwin decided to exterminate all the Jewish race in order to cleanse the world of vermin, but he failed because Mike Godwin was wrong!

Next, remember the case of the 1973 Supreme Court decision of Mike v. Godwin in which Infanticide became legalized because it was easier for Mommies to slash their fully alive little babies across the face than to cross their own legs in the first place!

Now in the Eternal Registry all of these deaths are accounted on the ledger marked, Charles Godwin, author of The Origin of Mike!

Whoop! Whoop! Whoop! YOU just won the Brownie Prize! That is what all of this is about!

You dudes don't like ad hominem attacks against the patron saints of evolution. Creation believers don't like ad honimen attacks either.

Boy! You ARE a "big man" to knock all of my "soft balls out of the park," aren't you?

Okay, you found the one about the allegation that you evolutionists like to assert that there might be something wrong with my mentality. Ad hominem attacks are no fun, are they?

By default, all humans have someone or something that they value highly. Call that god, saint, idol, whatever, even the irreligious WORSHIP.

WORSHIP = Focusing on subject of highest value...

Atheists are spineless because any imbecile can tell you what he or she doesn't like and what he or she thinks is wrong with something that is positively believed by another.

Take a STAND! Make a Positive Declaration before you or any other atheist criticizes what I believe again.

Tell me what you DO believe! Stop criticizing what I believe! BE A MAN!!!!!!! :)

"Tell me what you DO believe!" and "Make a Positive Declaration"

I get your point. I'm just tired of the misinformation that's floating around. I thought that my personal beliefs in this instance would just be irrelevant filler material. For whatever it's worth, my profile lists me as agnostic.

The man who creates a corollary that results in others using said corollary to kill vast numbers of people becomes complicit in the very deaths that the idea caused.

A corollary is something as a result of another effort without significant additional effort. There was certianly additional effort on the part of Hitler. Evolution doesn't incite violence against Jews.

Creation believers don't like ad honimen attacks either.

I don't understand your complaint. An ad hominem attack is a fallacious objection to an argument or factual claim by appealing to a characteristic or belief of the person making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument (source=Wiktionary). You went after Darwin, but didn't providing evidence that his motive for evolution was a rebellion against God. It's hard to prove intent, especially when somebody's dead. And then you tried to blame Evolution for Hitler. I imagine you have some sort of Beef with Evolution, and I would like to know where it developed from.

Boy! You ARE a "big man" to knock all of my "soft balls out of the park," aren't you?

That's what softballs are for. I might think I was a big man if I actually managed to knock a bunch (of real softballs) out of a park in a row. That would be pretty awesome.

"You evolutionists like to assert that there might be something wrong with my mentality."

I'm not attacking your mentality. I just didn't agree with what you said, and I hope you don't take disagreements personally. The mention of mentality that I made earlier was about your claim of Darwin's failing mentality. Not yours personally.

"By default, all humans have someone or something that they value highly. Call that god, saint, idol, whatever, even the irreligious WORSHIP."

Sure, there are things that I value highly, but my valuing of those things is different than the kind of value I assume you place in Jesus. I assume you have a devotion to the Christian deity. For instance, some people are devoted to classic cars that are also devoted very much to Christ. You wouldn't say they worship classic cars though.

"Atheists are spineless because any imbecile can tell you what he or she doesn't like and what he or she thinks is wrong with something that is positively believed by another."

Anyone, irregardless of religion, can do that. Christians do that as well. Does that make Christians spineless too? I don't think it does.