Waste and it like asking the fox to guard the hen house. . . the Bush policies of "free market" and greed got us here--how would 700billion in free cash change anything other than putting every American on the hook for the bail out???

This person really has Palin's speech rhythms pretty effectively--tho' not as dead on as the SNL skit!!

My vote is my wish--that this is the beginning of the end--however, I am more cynical than I want to be: He wants to suspend campaigning and encourage Obama to do so (along with Joe), so that ONLY Palin would be out stumping presidential politics and keeping on the minds of voters. . . .masterful, but extremely deceitful, plan. . . .

Tho' I personally hold that one's orientation is a private manner, I selected "undecided" here because I am fed up with how these non-issues cloud our political discussions. Religion is SEPARATE from secular issues and the business of government is secular! Let's talk issues: the economy, the war, our education needs, our infrastructure, our tax policies--THESE are the issues, not questions about one's orientation. . .

I really hope so. . . .if not, then our economy will be in shambles in another four years of failed Bush II economic policies. . .

Is this picture for real????

The answers do not truly reflect my thinking on McCain: (1) I believed in McCain's messaging during the last cycle (running against Bush II). . .he seemed moderate. (2) I respect his service to the country during the Viet Nam war (my own father was a POW during WWII--I can empathize with McCain very personally). (3) His choice of Palin does not align with my other observations of McCain and set off my conspiracy alarm bells. . . if nothing else, I think his vetting of Palin missed a great deal and reflects poorly on his judgement. . . .

No brainer here: whose policies have driven the economy to where it is right now? The republicans. . . and there is not a hair's breadth difference between McCain/Palin and the policies of Bush II. In fact, if McCain/Palin ticket wins--there will be another four years of driving the economy into the ground. . . and the rich get richer while the middle class continues to erode its earning power. . .

Since your responses are clearly biased, I don't have any choice but to respond in this manner--but the heart of the question is true: of course the framers of our government were "community organizers." Look at what community was then. . . . I would suggest you try to frame questions in a meaningful to stimulate discussion instead of bait fellow SHers with this sort of slanted question. . .

How can anyone seriously consider the McCain/Palin ticket when both are committed to the same economic policies that Bush has used for the last 8 years that has ruined us!

I think Sarah Palin is part of the conspiracy on the part of neo-cons and big oil to take over the country: Watch and see what happens if McCain wins. Here is my prediction--he will die in office within 2 years so Palin will succeed him and she will further the neo-con and big oil agenda. . . .watch and report back in 2.5 years to tell me I am wrong!

Tho' I have to confess this is somewhat of a challenging question: I respect McCain for his service, but his judgement comes into question when we consider (1) his support for Bush economic policies and (2) his process for selecting Palin. . .(NOTE: I am not a sexist when I say this; I was an ardent supporter of Hillary Clinton thoughout the primary season--look for my posts here!)

I concur with your assertion; however, I would hasten to add what Ron White says: "You can't fix stupid"!!

Have to own the fact that I am 55 and certainly don't have the physique for it--nevertheless, if given a chance, I would in a second. . . I push the envelop whenever I can (showers outside at the beach--in private areas), so sure--I would do it.

According to my wife and the radio call-in show where I shared some stories. . .the DJs thought I was very naughty. . .

Being a teenage male in a somewhat rural area of North Carolina--yes, we did all of these behaviors. . . and others: cat locked into a car overnight; potato in the tail pipe; putting items in the middle of a dark road for cars to hit. . .

First, I blame Bush for both his bankrupt tax policies, his kowtowing to insurance companies instead of dealing with health, and for his pre-emptive war with Iraq. Rarely have American presidents turned their backs on the values of this country and engaged in such an illegal activity as this war. Bush is solely to blame for that. But there are others responsible for things awry with the country, too: Partly the educational system in several parts of the country is to blame for not really preparing our young people for the 21st century. If you visit many classrooms in my region (central North Carolina) the classes are still preparing people for an economy that longer exists. The schools have to work smarter and more proactively than reactively. The media and our consumer-based culture is also to blame for some of our ills. Young people are NOT trained to be critical readers and thinkers, but they ARE trained to buy & use--then buy some more. If we really want to have an economy that is world class--this practice has to change.

Especially once Jonathan Winters joined the show as Mork's son (whose appearance was markedly older than his dad's--a strange Orkan process!)

No way. . .

Why would you need to protect something that does not need protection. The language will go in the direction it needs to go based on what users decide. Put the money and resourses into something more, like healthcare and alternative energy and climate, instead of wasting time and energy on policing something that cannot be policed.