Well it's more gratifying than any other sexuality.
It's a true sexual orientation (hence the official term 'zoosexuality'), that causes physical sexual reaction towards animals, as opposed to mental induction (such like a tabu).

Both testosterone and oestrogen are interspecifically compatible, thus one can be attracted to another species' primary sex scents and hormones.
We know this thanks to those kind people working on non-zoosexual homosexuality, funnily enough.

Just like non-zoosexual homosexuality, zoosexuality has been experienced at least once by every member within 10% of western world society.
Out of zoosexuality, homosexuality is the most common gender preference towards animals. And voyeurism is just as common in zoosexuality as it is in homosexuality, however, there is a bigger tabu of zoosexuality online, than with homosexuality - such persons are not included, if you were to include them, you'd be looking at about 5% more zoosexuals being existent in modern western society (as described in Alexa and Kinsey statistics).

Of course, I have to point out a few things.
I am one of many, but I also belong to one of many kinds of 'zoosexual'.

I am a cynophile, a zoophile who is exclusively attracted toward canines.
It's nothing to do with bestial nature or the higher availability, because in my lifetime of hard work, I had no exposure to canines whatsoever.

This, however, varies person to person.
While I may be classed what some call a 'good zoo', others may not be as good (or bad).

I am not reliant on tabu and refuse to join tabu websites such as http://beastforum.com/ (first thing you see is animal-sex pornography (I always query if there was abuse behind it, hence I don't like it)) and http://zetaforum.org/ (moreover a 'zeta' community, but yet again, full of pornography, though I do expect the same from any 'sex site' (what else do you expect to be discussed on a 'sex' site?), just there are barely any non-pornographic zoo websites about, hence I am trying to set the foundation of the older ZetaUnion enterprise, and have renamed it as 'ZooUnity').

Zoophiles prefer to call the members of such tabu websites (and others who treat it as bestial voyeurism/kink), 'bestialists'.
Colloquially, though, not formally, a 'bestialist' is someone who is zoosexual but does not love the animal (even if they claim they do), as we do not believe exposing your close lover online as 'acceptable'. When I say 'we', I mean a select group of true zoophiles, though, some 'zoos' don't care either way.

While I'm careful not to condemn these abusive groups, as a lot of innocent zoophiles have been sucked in to them and made to think that's the 'acceptable' way.
During my research I have come across members on such sites on my 'snoop' account, whom feel the same as I do, however they use the sites to socialise and feel at home with acceptance of their sexuality.

I doubt you'd understand it, unless you are zoosexual.
You cannot turn someone zoosexual; just as you can't turn us non-zoosexual.

You ask how I can be attracted to something that isn't even humanoid?
Well I ask who you can be attracted to something is human.

Is my zoophilia just erotic? You may also ask.
Well, I am, indeed, zoosexual, but it's no more sexual than making love.

There are zoosexuals who are sex crazy.
And there are those whom are just there to please their lovers, as am I.

If I were like them, I'd simply join one of their website.
But I do hate those whom abuse zoosexuality, and I am constantly on the go proving them wrong. But meanwhile, I have to defend myself from the insults I see everyday from the social network websites I have joined. And it's not easy. Just by saying whom you are can lead to the loss of your account, being chased by an anti-zoosexual stalker/vigilante, and even being arrested for obscenity.

Whenever national areas ban what they call 'bestiality', the media always says that they are banning the ever-moving 'porn show'.
I am not apart of these 'pornographic' cultures, and I never will be.

Of course, with these people on the rise, it is hard for us.
While we seek peace and legality; most of these members of 'zoo tabu' websites are begging for it to be kept illegal, because they get kicks or what not, in the mind, it's filthy, criminal and perverse, etc. And that's why we call them 'tabu' websites, because they treat it as a 'tabu'.

Though, whilst most of the zoophobes lack the mental capability to emulate how we feel and think, for the very reason they are so bigoted and simply call it 'perverse', whatever the issue; I ask if you can show the empathy, with the minutiae of data I have provided above from current affairs.
There's a lot of what I haven't said.

I, myself, am a zoo advocate, on my own venture, with barely anyone to help me.
And it appears the more discussion I open up on the internet, leads to me being banned from such sites (probably ending up being hunted to death if I let my personal information loose), and the anti-zoo bombarding me with views against it, with no analytical judgement.

Fine, you're entitled to your opinion.
But why condemn something you don't even understand yourself?

Regards,
James

P.S. Sorry for long post, but you said you were curious ;).

I ask the same of you.

Thanks for the Add

Hi Mejink. I'm not making war on liberals, I am a Liberal. The titles of the blogs are meant to be sarcastic. The blogs from today and yesterday are to provide my SH friends with the facts to argue the point that our founding fathers were not the bible-pumping Republicans that Conservatives tout.

Here's some more Blogs I made yesterday with some very interesting videos in. Some talk of consciousness. :o)

http://www.sodahead.com/blog/...

http://www.sodahead.com/blog/...

http://www.sodahead.com/blog/...

http://www.sodahead.com/blog/...

thanks for adding me.

Hey, you ask some good questions.


to a new SH friend,
Wanna

moderated...