
Your US GOVT in bed with Drug Cartels, while they continue to wage a false drug war on the people! Alleged of course, you be the judge!
Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
2012/08/10 18:35:47
TT note: Just like the IRS, the drug war is about property seizure, money, and private prisons making money!High-Ranking Mexican Drug Cartel Member Makes Explosive Allegation: ‘Fast and Furious’ Is Not What You Think It Is
- Posted on August 9, 2012 at 8:00am by
Jason Howerton
- Print »
- Email »
A high-ranking Mexican drug cartel operative currently in U.S.
custody is making startling allegations that the failed federal
gun-walking operation known as “Fast and Furious” isn’t what you think
it is.
It wasn’t about tracking guns, it was about supplying them — all part
of an elaborate agreement between the U.S. government and Mexico’s
powerful Sinaloa Cartel to take down rival cartels.
The explosive allegations are being made by Jesus Vicente
Zambada-Niebla, known as the Sinaloa Cartel’s “logistics coordinator.”
He was extradited to the Chicago last year to face federal drug charges.
Zambada-Niebla claims that under a “divide and conquer” strategy, the
U.S. helped finance and arm the Sinaloa Cartel through Operation Fast
and Furious in exchange for information that allowed the DEA, U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agencies to
take down rival drug cartels. The Sinaloa Cartel was allegedly permitted
to traffic massive amounts of drugs across the U.S. border from 2004 to
2009 — during both Fast and Furious and Bush-era gunrunning operations —
as long as the intel kept coming.
This pending court case against Zambada-Niebla is being closely
monitored by some members of Congress, who expect potential legal
ramifications if any of his claims are substantiated. The trial was
delayed but is now scheduled to begin on Oct. 9.
Zambada-Niebla is reportedly a close associate of Sinaloa Cartel
kingpin Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman and the son of Ismael “Mayo”
Zambada-Garcia, both of which remain fugitives, likely because of the
deal made with the DEA, federal court documents allege.
Based on the alleged agreement ”the Sinaloa Cartel under the
leadership of defendant’s father, Ismael Zambada-Niebla and ‘Chapo’
Guzman, were given carte blanche to continue to smuggle tons of illicit
drugs into Chicago and the rest of the United States and were also
protected by the United States government from arrest and prosecution in
return for providing information against rival cartels which helped
Mexican and United States authorities capture or kill thousands of rival
cartel members,” states a motion for discovery filed in U.S. District Court by Zambada-Niebla’s attorney in July 2011.
A source in Congress, who spoke to TheBlaze on the condition of
anonymity, said that some top congressional investigators have been
keeping “one eye on the case.” Another two members of Congress, both
lead Fast and Furious Congressional investigators, told TheBlaze they
had never even heard of the case.
One of the Congressmen, who also spoke to TheBlaze on the condition
of anonymity because criminal proceedings are still ongoing, called the
allegations “disturbing.” He said Congress will likely get involved once
Zambada-Niebla’s trial has concluded if any compelling information
surfaces.
“Congress won’t get involved in really any criminal case until the
trial is over and the smoke has cleared,” he added. “If the allegations
prove to hold any truth, there will be some serious legal
ramifications.”
Earlier this month, two men in Texas were sentenced
to 70 and 80 months in prison after pleading guilty to attempting to
export 147 assault rifles and thousands of rounds of ammunition to
Mexico’s Los Zetas cartel. Compare that to the roughly 2,000 firearms
reportedly “walked” in Fast and Furious, which were used in the murders
of hundreds of Mexican citizens and U.S. Border Agent Brian Terry, and
some U.S. officials could potentially face jail time if they knowingly
armed the Sinaloa Cartel and allowed guns to cross into Mexico.
If proven in court, such an agreement between U.S. law enforcement
agencies and a Mexican cartel could potentially mar both the Bush and
Obama administrations. The federal government is denying all of
Zambada-Niebla’s allegations and contend that no official immunity deal
was agreed upon.
To be sure, Zambada-Niebla is a member of one of the most ruthless
drug gangs in all of Mexico, so there is a chance that he is saying
whatever it takes to reduce his sentence, which will likely be hefty.
However, Congress and the media have a duty to prove without a
reasonable doubt that there is no truth in his allegations. So far, that
has not been achieved.
Zambada-Niebla was reportedly responsible for coordinating all of the
Sinaloa Cartel’s multi-ton drug shipments from Central and South
American countries, through Mexico, and into the United States. To
accomplish this, he used every tool at his disposal: Boeing 747 cargo
planes, narco-submarines, container ships, speed boats, fishing vessels,
buses, rail cars, tractor trailers and automobiles. But Guzman and
Zambada-Niebla’s overwhelming success within the Sinaloa Cartel was
largely due to the arrests and dismantling of many of their competitors
and their booming businesses in the U.S. from 2004 to 2009 — around the
same time ATF’s gun-walking operations were in full swing. Fast and
Furious reportedly began in 2009 and continued into early 2011.
According Zambada-Niebla, that was a product of the collusion between the U.S. government and the Sinaloa Cartel.

Soldiers
and police officers guard packages of seized marijuana during a
presentation for the media in Tijuana, Mexico. (AP Photo/Guillermo
Arias)
The claims seem to fall in line with statements made last
month by Guillermo Terrazas Villanueva, a spokesman for the Chihuahua
state government in northern Mexico who said U.S. agencies ”don’t fight
drug traffickers,“ instead ”they try to manage the drug trade.”
Also, U.S. officials have previously acknowledged working with the Sinaloa Cartel through another informant, Humberto
Loya-Castro. He is also allegedly a high-ranking member of the Sinaloa
Cartel as well as a close confidant and lawyer of “El Chapo” Guzman.
Loya-Castro was indicted along with Chapo and Mayo in 1995 in the
Southern District of California in a massive narcotics trafficking
conspiracy (Case no. 95CR0973).
The case was dismissed in 2008 at the request of prosecutors after Loya
became an informant for the United States government and subsequently
provided information for years.
In 2005, “the CS (informant Loya-Castro) signed a cooperation
agreement with the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern
District of California,” states an affidavit filed in the Zambada-Niebla case by Loya-Castro’s handler, DEA agent Manuel Castanon.
“Thereafter, I began to work with the CS. Over the years, the CS’
cooperation resulted in the seizure of several significant loads of
narcotics and precursor chemicals. The CS’ cooperation also resulted in
other real-time intelligence that was very useful to the United States
government.”
Under the alleged agreement with U.S. agencies, “the Sinaloa Cartel,
through Loya-Castro, was to provide information accumulated by Mayo,
Chapo, and others, against rival Mexican Drug Trafficking Organizations
to the United States government,” a motion for discovery states.
In return, the United States government allegedly agreed to dismiss
the charges in the pending case against Loya-Castro (which they did),
not to interfere with his drug trafficking activities and those of the
Sinaloa Cartel and not actively prosecute him or the Sinaloa Cartel
leadership.
Taken directly from the motion filed in federal court:
“This strategy, which he calls ‘Divide & Conquer,’
using one drug organization to help against others, is exactly what the
Justice Department and its various agencies have implemented in Mexico.
In this case, they entered into an agreement with the leadership of the
Sinaloa Cartel through, among others, Humberto Loya-Castro, to receive
their help in the United States government’s efforts to destroy other
cartels.”“Indeed, United States government agents aided the leaders of the Sinaloa Cartel.”
The government has denied this and says the deal did not go past Loya-Castro.
Zambada-Niebla was arrested by Mexican soldiers in late March of 2009
after he met with DEA agents at a Mexico City hotel in a meeting
arranged by Loya-Castro, though the U.S. government was not involved in
his arrest. He was extradited to Chicago to face federal drug charges on
Feb. 18, 2010. He is now being held in a Michigan prison after
requesting to be moved from Chicago.
“Classified Materials”
During his initial court proceedings, Zambada-Niebla continually
stated that he was granted full immunity by the DEA in exchange for his
cooperation. The agency, however, argues that an “official” immunity
deal was never established though they admit he may have acted as an
informant.
Zambada-Niebla and his legal council also requested records about
Operation Fast and Furious, which permitted weapons purchased in the
United States to be illegally smuggled into Mexico, sometimes by paid
U.S. informants and cartel leaders. Their request was denied. From the defense motion:
“It is estimated that approximately 3,000 people were
killed in Mexico as a result of ‘Operation Fast and Furious,’ including
law enforcement officers in the state of Sinaloa, Mexico, the
headquarters of the Sinaloa cartel. The Department of Justice’s
leadership apparently saw this as an ingenious way of combating drug
cartel activities.”“It has recently been disclosed that in addition to the
above-referenced problems with ‘Operation Fast & Furious,’ the DOJ,
DEA, and the FBI knew that some of the people who were receiving the
weapons that were being allowed to be transported to Mexico, were in
fact informants working for those organizations and included some of the
leaders of the cartels.”
Zambada’s attorney has filed several motions for discovery to that
effect in Illinois Federal District Court, which were summarily denied
by the presiding judge who claimed the defendant failed to make the case
that he was actually a DEA informant.
In April, 2012, a federal judge refused to dismiss charges against him.
From a Chicago Sun Times report:
“According to the government, [Zambada-Niebla] conveyed his interest
and willingness to cooperate with the U.S. government, but the DEA
agents told him they ‘were not authorized to meet with him, much less
have substantive discussions with him,’” the judge wrote.

In
this courtroom artist's drawing Jesus Vincente Zambada-Niebla appears
before U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2010, in
Chicago. (AP Photo/Verna Sadock)
In their official response to
Zambada-Niebla’s motion for discovery, the federal government confirmed
the existence of “classified materials” regarding the case but argued
they “do not support the defendant’s claim that he was promised immunity
or public authority for his actions.”
Experts have expressed doubts that Zambada-Niebla had an official
agreement with the U.S. government, however, agree Loya Castro probably
did. Either way, the defense still wants to obtain DEA reports that
detail the agency’s relationship with the Sinaloa Cartel and put the
agents on the stand, under oath to testify.
The documents that detail the relationship between the federal
government and the Sinaloa Cartel have still not been released or
subjected to review — citing matters of national security.
(Editor’s note: The impetus for this article came from author Reed A. Williams, whose upcoming book “The Weed That Just Won’t Die” delves deeply into the Zambada-Niebla court case. Get more details on the book here.)
http://libertycrier.com/government/high-ranking-mexican-drug-...
Top Opinion
-
DDogbreath 2012/08/10 20:31:17




















NDAA anti american law profascist, and obama signed it into law! that by-passes fair trial!
their is anti protest bills, so peaceful protesters can no longer stand up for what is right, (mind you cops love to beat peaceful protesters while letting rioters destroy)
then their is ACTA PIPA
then in airports they touch you up or take naked pics, talk about an invasion of privacy!
are damned unamerican-
no crime required...
no charges need even be filed-
tho no crime may have been committed ...
even when charges are not filed...
or dropped...
one must go to court...
to get anything returned-
so obviously a racket-
even if a crime was committed...
what happened to "secure in property"???
this is simply base thuggery...
no denying it-