You Need To Listen To This Muslim Activist Judge In PA

"Our forefathers intended that we use the first amendment so that we could speak what's on our mind, not piss off other cultures..... Islam is not just a religion, it's their culture, their culture, the very essence, their very being. They pray five times a day, towards Mecca. To be a good Muslim before you die, you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you cannot because you are too ill, too elderly, whatever, you must make the attempt. Their greetings salum alaikum waliakum as-salm )as answered by voice), uh may god be with you. It is very common, their language, when they are speaking to each other, it is very common for them to say, uh allah willing, this will happen. It's they are so immersed in it. And what you've done is you've completey trashed their essence, their being. They find it very, very, very offensive. I am a Muslim. I find it very offensive ..... You are way outside your bounds of first amendment rights."

Excuse the f*** out of me? He's getting a lesson on Islam? You do NOT have the right to physically attack someone. You DO have the right to free speech and expression.

I am absolutely appalled by this judge. Absolutely appalled. This is the United States of America and we don't follow Sharia Law, we follow Constitutional Law.

This judge needs to be FIRED..... I am so beyond livid! The judge threw out the case because the insult was to someone who was Islamic? Tough sh!t and join the club!! That does NOT give you the right to attack someone!!

So I am sure this will make me highly unpopular and end with even more people blocking me but what the heck...

1: Justices in the USA are supposed to use rule of law, NOT rule of religion in every CRIMINAL case and this was a criminal case assult is a crime.

2: In the USA we do allow religious laws to come into play. We allow this for the purpose of CIVIAL cases (some very common ones are Jewis devorce and varrious matters of inheritance).

3: We also allow defendants to claim religion as a defence in crimainal trials aka when a peron kills an abortion doctor and claims he did it in the name of God and now saddly as we are seeing religion is teh defense in the outbreak of those "honor killings". However in such cases the religious defense is not supposed to out weight the legal aspects, it is only something for consideration just like when a jury/judge is considering a defendants mental state at the time of a crime (actually exactly like that).

What this judge did with his ruling and his statement is put every one of us and our rights at risk. People will here this judge and hear about other judges who make simular rulings using religion OVER law rather than as a "consideration" and demand lawmakers ban all use of "islamic" or "Sharia" law and support will gather. and then laws will be passed and for a moment many will breath a sigh of relief that is UNTILL someone screams discrimination because they want to use Sharia in the writing of a business contract or a will and they are told its against the law in the USA and then it will go through the courts and the Supreme court will eventually take up the case and they will rule that yes to ban just ONE religion from use is discrimination a violation of the 1st amendment and therefore the solution will be to ban every religion which means Jewis laws and Christians laws and every other you can think to name which uses religious doctrine to set up certain aspects

Then where will we be? I just say this because even though I am not religious I believe everyone has a right to their religion in this country. However, I also believe their right to religion ends at teh tip of the other persons nose. I don't want anyone to lose their rights even those I do not agree with and this judge is setting us all up for just that.