Wow heres a liberal - scared to death of OBAMA
ImageBandit ~ American Patriot
2009/03/12 20:11:51
|
|
|||||
|
1 vote
|
|
2% | ||
|
20 votes
|
|
34% | ||
|
3 votes
|
|
5% | ||
|
28 votes
|
|
48% | ||
|
1 vote
|
|
2% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
9% | ||
In case you missed it in the POST.
---Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 8:26 PM This is the first liberal main stream media type to recognize the danger that Obama presents to the well being of our citizens and the entire financial system. What is most significant is that this reporter is the dean of the liberal Washington Post press corp. Hopefully, others will awaken to the danger also. The media "made" this man and it would be ironic if they "unmade" him. -------------------------------------------------------------... David Broder,
the "Dean" of liberal pundits presiding at the Washington Post itself, has finally caught on. Mr. Broder has the shakes over Obama's O-dacity. Good news! Here's one liberal who is in touch with reality, and he's scared out of his wits. Writes Mr. Broder, "The size of the gamble that President Obama is taking every day is simply staggering. What came through in his speech... Tuesday night was a dramatic reminder of the unbelievable stakes he has placed on the table in his first month in office, putting at risk the future well-being of the country and the Democratic Party's control of Washington I've come to believe that the Obama crowd is naive to the point of stupidity. They are very intelligent, mind you. They have more academic degrees than the faculty of Harvard. But intelligent people are often deeply stuck in their fix-the-world fantasies, which makes them idiot savants. (There's a reason why that's a French term --- Moliere wrote a comedy about it four centuries ago.) These people have never accomplished anything but suckering the voters --- and each other. Their policy genius, David Axelrod, is a PR agent. That helped with the campaign, but it means nothing for good government. They seem to have no concept of the economy.. They want to impose a cap-and-trade system on "carbon emissions," like oil and coal. That comes down to making Monopoly money and forcing energy-using corporations to pay for it. They have no concept of productive investment compared to a wild spending spree on feel-good ideas, or on kickbacks to their buddies in Chicago . After all the "community organizer" hoo-hah they still learned nothing from the welfare fiasco that was inflicted on Black families by LBJ's War on Poverty, and which ended up hurting them more than anything Bull Connor could have done --- by way of family breakdown, helpless dependency, drugs, and gang warfare. They've just abolished Bill Clinton's version of welfare reform, which was forced upon him by the Gingrich Congress, and which has ended up really helping people, not hurting them. Conclusion: These folks are arrogant and ignorant. Intelligent, yes, articulate, yes, and utterly persuasive to millions of suckers, yes. But reality has a harsh way with fools. David Broder is now spotting the looming steam locomotive chugging his way, and he is seeing a grave danger to "the Democratic Party's control of Washington
."Too bad for the Democratic Party. But what worries me very much is that Obama is "putting at risk the future well-being of the country," as Broder writes. That means you and me and all the things we care about.
And Obama is much too arrogant to change his mind.
Watch for a bad train wreck down the road.
---Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 8:26 PM This is the first liberal main stream media type to recognize the danger that Obama presents to the well being of our citizens and the entire financial system. What is most significant is that this reporter is the dean of the liberal Washington Post press corp. Hopefully, others will awaken to the danger also. The media "made" this man and it would be ironic if they "unmade" him. -------------------------------------------------------------... David Broder,
the "Dean" of liberal pundits presiding at the Washington Post itself, has finally caught on. Mr. Broder has the shakes over Obama's O-dacity. Good news! Here's one liberal who is in touch with reality, and he's scared out of his wits. Writes Mr. Broder, "The size of the gamble that President Obama is taking every day is simply staggering. What came through in his speech... Tuesday night was a dramatic reminder of the unbelievable stakes he has placed on the table in his first month in office, putting at risk the future well-being of the country and the Democratic Party's control of Washington I've come to believe that the Obama crowd is naive to the point of stupidity. They are very intelligent, mind you. They have more academic degrees than the faculty of Harvard. But intelligent people are often deeply stuck in their fix-the-world fantasies, which makes them idiot savants. (There's a reason why that's a French term --- Moliere wrote a comedy about it four centuries ago.) These people have never accomplished anything but suckering the voters --- and each other. Their policy genius, David Axelrod, is a PR agent. That helped with the campaign, but it means nothing for good government. They seem to have no concept of the economy.. They want to impose a cap-and-trade system on "carbon emissions," like oil and coal. That comes down to making Monopoly money and forcing energy-using corporations to pay for it. They have no concept of productive investment compared to a wild spending spree on feel-good ideas, or on kickbacks to their buddies in Chicago . After all the "community organizer" hoo-hah they still learned nothing from the welfare fiasco that was inflicted on Black families by LBJ's War on Poverty, and which ended up hurting them more than anything Bull Connor could have done --- by way of family breakdown, helpless dependency, drugs, and gang warfare. They've just abolished Bill Clinton's version of welfare reform, which was forced upon him by the Gingrich Congress, and which has ended up really helping people, not hurting them. Conclusion: These folks are arrogant and ignorant. Intelligent, yes, articulate, yes, and utterly persuasive to millions of suckers, yes. But reality has a harsh way with fools. David Broder is now spotting the looming steam locomotive chugging his way, and he is seeing a grave danger to "the Democratic Party's control of Washington
."Too bad for the Democratic Party. But what worries me very much is that Obama is "putting at risk the future well-being of the country," as Broder writes. That means you and me and all the things we care about.
And Obama is much too arrogant to change his mind.
Watch for a bad train wreck down the road.
Top Opinion
-
mjaeu 2009/03/13 03:07:02I wish more liberals would see the light
+10To me this is no longer about lib or conserv, or black and white, It is about all us who live here and value our lives and freedom. I hope that more people regardless of what they think, where they live or which party they belong to put all else aside, be afriad and do something before we are in a black spin out to sea. That is just me though.
I used to prescribe to there blog feed, and the New York Times as well, that was a riot. Loved telling them, what a rotten journalist rag they were dumping on the American public.
All will soon open their eyes to the truth, they have been mesmerized in to believing that Obama was the Pied Piper, and would lead them down the primrose path full of rose pedal's, with the steely sound of "Rap" music in the background
There are only two types of Democrats (liberals and socialists; Obama happens to be the absolute worst of both types). Although millions of liberal Democrats voted for Obama, the socialist Democrats are who conspired to promote (replacing reponsible journalism with biased, polarized leftist propaganda; Obama's ACORN infiltrating voting stations in at least 23 states) him better than any other American product.
Although Obama is as evil and immoral as any secular humanist liberal could be, his loyalty lies with black Democrats (racist socialists who only voted for Obama for his skin color, NOT his leadership experience or abilities: he has none).
With the trillions of taxpayers' dollars being wasted by Obama (only for his party's benefit), the liberal Democrats feel cheated that their Godless political projects aren't receiving more stolen taxpayers' dollars (taxes paid mostly by Republicans) for abortions, promoting homosexuality, and shutting down Christian churches throughout the US.
As a Conservative, I would laugh at their infighting, but I am COMPLETELY disgusted with the thief Obama and his financial destruction of our formerly great country.
Do you remember this as a kid? "Prove it!" I suspect you will be hearing a lot of that on this poll and then get a lot of this:
Sham #1: BO says he's going to give a tax "cut" to 95% of Americans, but it's really tax credits he's talking about, so we have sham 1. You can't give a tax CUT to 40% /- of Americans that pay no taxes. Any money you give them would simply, and rightfully, be called welfare.
Sham #2: The tax credit (that he's calling a cut) relates to things like payroll taxes that offset your income tax, withholding for Medicare/SS that go to fund those programs, state withholding, etc. That sounds great doesn't it? Well, your big tax "cut" (remember it's a credit though) has amounted to about $675 (averaged) per person per year or $13 per week. Hallelujah! Honey, we can make one more trip to McDonald's per week for the year. That's a sham for the working class families of America that Obama purports to be helping, but it gets worse.
Sham #3: That money lost in sham#2 must be made up somewhere. You don't think big government is going to take a loss on that when they can stick it to the public do you? So where does the money come from? TO FUND HIS HANDOUT THAT GOT YOUR VOTE, your taxes (indirect taxes mind you) will go up on just about everything else. He's alrea...""''
'''''
Sham #1: BO says he's going to give a tax "cut" to 95% of Americans, but it's really tax credits he's talking about, so we have sham 1. You can't give a tax CUT to 40% /- of Americans that pay no taxes. Any money you give them would simply, and rightfully, be called welfare.
Sham #2: The tax credit (that he's calling a cut) relates to things like payroll taxes that offset your income tax, withholding for Medicare/SS that go to fund those programs, state withholding, etc. That sounds great doesn't it? Well, your big tax "cut" (remember it's a credit though) has amounted to about $675 (averaged) per person per year or $13 per week. Hallelujah! Honey, we can make one more trip to McDonald's per week for the year. That's a sham for the working class families of America that Obama purports to be helping, but it gets worse.
Sham #3: That money lost in sham#2 must be made up somewhere. You don't think big government is going to take a loss on that when they can stick it to the public do you? So where does the money come from? TO FUND HIS HANDOUT THAT GOT YOUR VOTE, your taxes (indirect taxes mind you) will go up on just about everything else. He's already got his sights set on them. They are (not an all-inclusive list) higher federal gasoline taxes, higher federal excise taxes, higher federal heating oil taxes, higher federal telecom taxes, higher Social Security taxes, higher Medicare taxes, etc. Just about everything that can be taxed is being "explored" by the Chosen One, and based on his record, we know what's going to happen with them. That's a sham people!
Sham #4: Back to the tax credit/cut issues. A tax cut, which he said he is going to make sure everyone gets except the rich, the 2% that work really hard to make an even better life for themselves, is going to be had by everyone else. Well guess what folks? If you lower the marginal rate on a couple making $50K (these folks don't have any deductions for all you accountants out there) by a whopping 5%, their tax goes from about $8800 to $7900. Do you think that $900 per year EXTRA you have via the tax CREDIT is going to pay for your increased gasoline costs, your increased electric bills, your increased phone taxes, your increased heating oil taxes, your increased sin taxes (smokes and booze), et al? Of course it's not, but the uneducated can't reason through that! That's the last sham I'm sharing tonight.
Educating the misinformed is HARD work! :-)