Would you vote for Romney if evidence comes out he broke the law?

I, so far, have supported Romney. But if he did lie about not being with Bain when he actually was, (for which there was no actual reason to lie about it), I would not support him if there were someone else to vote for other than the man who took us even deeper into the ditch that he promised he would get us out of in his first 3 years.

If the currant Pres. hadn't LIED on several points that he campaigned on and promised the American people just to get elected (I could mention all of them like, "Your taxes will not go up one thin dime", and, "It is definitely NOT A TAX, but the facts wouldn't be paid attention to), I would support him and not Romney. However, Obama has lied to the American people LONG before Romney (may have) lied about his past, and Romney has not yet hurt America by his lies, whereas Obama has severely crippled the middle class with all of his lies.

So, in my humble opinion, I would still rather have someone running the country that lied about ONE thing that didn't take money out of my pocket to pay for a bridge to nowhere and to save a guppy in San Francisco for Nasty Pilousy, than to vote for someone who has lied about SEVERAL things that HAVE taken money out of my pocket to pay for; the most food stamps used in history, toward the support more welfare benefits, over 99 weeks of unemployment to thousands of workers which HE said would be working with an unemployment rate that he lied about and said that it would never go above 8% but in the meantime has never gone below 8%, and so on, and so on.

Romney may be a crook, and may be worse than Obama, but similarly to what Nasty Pilousy said, "We'll just have to elect him before we can see what's in his plan". Isn't that the Democratic way?????????