Quantcast

Would You Vote for a Guy Named 'Mr. Pro-Life'?

SodaHead News 2010/11/02 11:00:00
You!
Add Photos & Videos
And you thought the “Rent Is Too Damn High” guy was bizarre? Meet Mr. Pro-Life.

According to The Daily Beast, the independent Idaho gubernatorial candidate, born Marvin Richardson, officially changed his name when he first ran for office, billing himself as “Pro-Life (a person formerly known as Marvin Richardson)", then shortening it to clear up any confusion.

The father of 15 and organic strawberry farmer is described as an “unfailing advocate for the defenseless, a moral vegetarian who shuns all killing” who was toeing the Tea Party line before that party even existed.

At a debate last month he once again called for the shuttering of the U.S. Department of Education, calling public education a “Communist doctrine,” a statement similar to ones he’s made in previous bids for governor (2006) and Senate (2008).

And while Pro-Life has little chance of pulling out a victory in Idaho, the Beast asked what might happen if someone else with Pro-Life’s same take on the Dept. of Education, such as Nevada’s Sharron Angle or Alaska’s Joe Miller, does pull out a victory?

Idaho parents don’t have to worry just yet, since the state’s constitution specifically calls for a thorough system of public schools, but Mr. Pro-Life thinks the federal constitution trumps the state’s mandate, a typical Tea Party take on things.

But wait, can we get back to the fact that there is a guy running for the state’s highest office who has changed his name to Mr. Pro-Life? He has said he will keep running “in every election until I die” in order to save the unborn.

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • sodabox 2010/11/02 13:37:57
    No
    sodabox
    +15
    People would vote for this guy? That's even scarier then him!

    Want to know who gets abortions?
    42% have income below $10k
    27% have income of $10-$20k
    That’s 69% have income below $20k
    91% occur in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy
    75% say they cannot afford to have it
    65% say they are christian.
    You really want to force these women to have their babies? Really?

    91 percent are performed during the first trimester (12 or fewer weeks' gestation)
    9 percent are performed in the second trimester (24 or fewer weeks' gestation)
    0.01 percent (only about 100 per year) are performed in the third trimester (more than 24 weeks' gestation)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • J luvguins 2010/11/03 19:41:25
    J
    MOST have not been raped. MOST are selective abortions.
  • luvguins J 2010/11/03 20:01:13
    luvguins
    I'm not for abortion on demand, but you radicals want none even in rape, incest, or the life of a mother. How about birth control methods on demand for men and women?
  • J luvguins 2010/11/03 20:18:19 (edited)
    J
    where you will be met by cops who will have a rape kit done and get all the necessary information to catch the criminal. In the case of incest - really, now do you think that Sally is going to be allowed to have an abortion at the risk of Uncle Tommy or the step-dad getting caught? Not really. Now, when it is evident that the LIFE of the mother is at risk, physically, then it should be up to her to make that call. If she is married, the decision should be weighed by all major players, with the woman's call most prominent.
  • ɟʇʇoɔs 2010/11/02 19:57:45
    No
    ɟʇʇoɔs
    I am sure he is a nice person... But to change your name to Mr. Pro Life?? Seems a bit off his rocker for me
  • Jeff 2010/11/02 19:55:23
    No
    Jeff
    Another Hypocrite....I am so sick of these idiots....cant they just crawl back into their holes and go away.
  • kobidobidog 2010/11/02 19:40:04
    Undecided
    kobidobidog
    +1
    I am for the defenseless my self, but humans should use Reason. beef and etc,are not bad thing to eat, and is only bad to those that thinks it is bad. 1 Corinthians 10:23-29 23All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. 24Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth. 25Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake: 26For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof. 27If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake. 28But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof: 29Conscience, I say, not thine own, but of the other: for why is my liberty judged of another man's conscience? 30For if I by grace be a partaker, why am I evil spoken of for that for which I give thanks?

    31Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God. 32Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God: 33Even as I please all men in all things, not seeking mine own profit, ...
    <<>>


    I am for the defenseless my self, but humans should use Reason. beef and etc,are not bad thing to eat, and is only bad to those that thinks it is bad. 1 Corinthians 10:23-29 23All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. 24Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth. 25Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, that eat, asking no question for conscience sake: 26For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof. 27If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake. 28But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, and for conscience sake: for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness thereof: 29Conscience, I say, not thine own, but of the other: for why is my liberty judged of another man's conscience? 30For if I by grace be a partaker, why am I evil spoken of for that for which I give thanks?

    31Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God. 32Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles, nor to the church of God: 33Even as I please all men in all things, not seeking mine own profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved.
    << Titus 1:15 >>King James Bible
    Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.

    To be against the death penalty,and war,and oppression of humans, like the zoo,and and against nudity laws, and humans hating humans is a good thing.
    (more)
  • Herb 2010/11/02 19:39:04
    Yes
    Herb
    if he actually is, better then baby killer lol. but that could help him win.
  • captkirk999 2010/11/02 19:34:13
    No
    captkirk999
    +1
    false morality
  • Pika captkir... 2010/11/02 22:00:37
    Pika
    It's not false morality. Just stop with that. There are plenty of people who oppose the death penalty AND abortion
  • captkir... Pika 2010/11/04 00:20:16 (edited)
    captkirk999
    Pro-life is a way of making the illusion that you are "moral" even though you support the death of troops for big oil. The death of Innocent people who live in the middle east by gun fire or white phosperus. Support off shore oil drilling that could create more black seas to black seas even though you sing about "shining seas to shining seas." pro life MY ASS!
  • Pika captkir... 2010/11/04 00:21:13
    Pika
    I actually don't support the death of innocent people under any circumstances. I don't feel I have false morality
  • bad-day 2010/11/02 18:58:31
    No
    bad-day
    Not all people are pro-life
  • WshngMchn 2010/11/02 18:30:00
    No
    WshngMchn
    That guy looks really boring. I NEVER vote for boring people.
  • pen pal 2010/11/02 18:05:39
    No
    pen pal
    No, would you vote for a man called Penpal? I wouldn't. However if I chose to run for office, you could be certain I wouldn't being changing my name to attract attention to myself.
  • Truth Matters 2010/11/02 17:53:44
    Yes
    Truth Matters
    Are you sure that isn't Jack Kevorkian? Those Democrats lie about everything.
  • breaker Truth M... 2010/11/02 19:30:16
  • Andrea 2010/11/02 17:38:19
    Yes
    Andrea
    More so than I would for someone who calls himself Mr. Let's Kill All The Babies.
  • ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Ant... 2010/11/02 17:33:37
    Yes
    ~Pro-Fetus Anti-Liberal Anti-Atheist~
    Well, he has morals. And being pro-life is my number one criteria when it comes to voting. If they aren't pro-life on either side, I won't vote for either candidate. I think that I will move to Idaho today, if he wins.
  • Heisenberg 2010/11/02 17:32:57
    Yes
    Heisenberg
    +2
    Would I vote for a man who passionately defends innocent human life?

    You betcha!

    vote passionately defends innocent human life betcha
  • GrumpyCat 2010/11/02 17:21:21
    No
    GrumpyCat
    0.0
  • runningintriangles 2010/11/02 16:43:04
    No
    runningintriangles
    +3
    ...this guy sounds like a real nut to me.
    a) He changed his name to "Pro-Life" HIS NAME. That's on passports, licenses, etc.
    b) He was 15 children. No one in their right mind has 15 children in this day and age.
    c) He's against education. Only an idiot is against education.
  • JBC American Patriot 2010/11/02 16:40:11
  • Lanikai 2010/11/02 16:11:52
    Yes
    Lanikai
    +1
    yep and I ONLY vote for candidiates that are pro life. NEVER a pro choice.
  • breaker Lanikai 2010/11/02 16:37:56
  • sodabox Lanikai 2010/11/02 23:20:53
    sodabox
    How many crack-babies have you adopted?
  • Tresa 2010/11/02 15:44:49
    No
    Tresa
    This guy reminds me of the evil undertaker from the old horror movie Phantasm...seriously he does. Those probably aren't even 15 kids it's dead people he's turned into little evil midgets just like in the movie.
    I try to shy away from the extreme's no matter which side they're on and this man seems a tad bit extreme...so no I wouldn't vote for him.
  • Kinetic 2010/11/02 15:09:52
    Undecided
    Kinetic
    +2
    Mr. Pro-Life is right about Democrat NEA/GLSEN/GLBT monopolized indoctrination facilities called 'public schools'.

    Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth

    A Primer for Principals, Educators & School Personnel

    This factsheet has been developed by a group of education, health, mental health, and religious organizations that all share a concern for the health and education of all students in schools, including lesbian, gay, and bisexual students .

    We hope that you and others who care about and work with youth will review the factual and scientific information provided herein and weigh it carefully in considering how to respond appropriately to controversies about homosexuality when they arise in your school.

    Also, a guidance counselor in a public school context may not attempt to persuade a gay, lesbian or bisexual student of the religious belief of some that homosexuality is a sin, or otherwise seek to impose a negative religious view of being gay, lesbian or bisexual on the student .

    As clearly illustrated by the foregoing discussion of concerns and policies of health and mental health professionals, school officials should be deeply concerned about the validity and bias of materials or presentations that promote a change to a person's sexual orientation as a “cur...










    Mr. Pro-Life is right about Democrat NEA/GLSEN/GLBT monopolized indoctrination facilities called 'public schools'.

    Just the Facts About Sexual Orientation & Youth
    neaglsenglbt monopolized indoctrination facilities public schools facts sexual orientation youth
    A Primer for Principals, Educators & School Personnel


    This factsheet has been developed by a group of education, health, mental health, and religious organizations that all share a concern for the health and education of all students in schools, including lesbian, gay, and bisexual students.

    We hope that you and others who care about and work with youth will review the factual and scientific information provided herein and weigh it carefully in considering how to respond appropriately to controversies about homosexuality when they arise in your school.

    Also, a guidance counselor in a public school context may not attempt to persuade a gay, lesbian or bisexual student of the religious belief of some that homosexuality is a sin, or otherwise seek to impose a negative religious view of being gay, lesbian or bisexual on the student.

    As clearly illustrated by the foregoing discussion of concerns and policies of health and mental health professionals, school officials should be deeply concerned about the validity and bias of materials or presentations that promote a change to a person's sexual orientation as a “cure” or suggest that being gay, lesbian, or bisexual is unhealthy. School officials routinely make such judgments in determining which educational and instructional materials to use in their schools.

    The printing and distribution of this publication has been supported by the National Education Association, Michael Dively, the American Psychological Association, the American Federation of Teachers, the National Association of School Psychologists, and the National Association of Social Workers.

    1. Development of curriculum and instructional materials and programs designed to meet the needs of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender students.
    2. Involvement of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender educators in developing educational materials used in classroom instruction.
    3. Dissemination of programs that support gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, and questioning students and address the high drop out rate, suicide rate, and health risk behaviors.
    4. Recognition of the importance of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender education employees as role models.
    5. Accurate portrayal of the roles and contributions of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people throughout history.
    6. Dissemination of programs and information that include the contributions, heritage, culture, and history of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people.
    7. Coordination with gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender organizations and concerned agencies that promote the contributions, heritage, culture, history, health and care of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgender people.
    http://www.glsen.org/binary-d...
    (more)
  • chaoskitty123 2010/11/02 14:53:06
    Undecided
    chaoskitty123
    +1
    The public educational system is a disgrace and Progressives made it that way always pushing one new idea after another which blow up in their faces and as usual, they then walk away as if it never happened allowing their mistakes to compound the problem until now our public schools are worse than those of some third world nations. The teachers unions control most of our schools in partnership with Progressives so that they are often some of the laziest people in the country who actually claim to have a job and then compound that with how school funds are mismanaged with absolutely no way to address this even when over half the funds are squandered.

    Once a school begins to deteriorate, it takes more and more money to operate meaning our children get less and less of an education and eventually, even the facilities begin falling apart around them so that the entire school needs rebuilt from the ground up just like the educational process itself.

    Meanwhile, our private and religious schools remain some of the best in the world because most are controlled by Conservatives who preserved what worked from when we had the worlds best schools revealing the stark contrast between Conservative and Progressive values as if it ain't broke... don't fix it and yet Progressives, by their ...



























    The public educational system is a disgrace and Progressives made it that way always pushing one new idea after another which blow up in their faces and as usual, they then walk away as if it never happened allowing their mistakes to compound the problem until now our public schools are worse than those of some third world nations. The teachers unions control most of our schools in partnership with Progressives so that they are often some of the laziest people in the country who actually claim to have a job and then compound that with how school funds are mismanaged with absolutely no way to address this even when over half the funds are squandered.

    Once a school begins to deteriorate, it takes more and more money to operate meaning our children get less and less of an education and eventually, even the facilities begin falling apart around them so that the entire school needs rebuilt from the ground up just like the educational process itself.

    Meanwhile, our private and religious schools remain some of the best in the world because most are controlled by Conservatives who preserved what worked from when we had the worlds best schools revealing the stark contrast between Conservative and Progressive values as if it ain't broke... don't fix it and yet Progressives, by their very nature, feel they must change everything even when you have the best education money can buy until you have the worst education you can waste your money on.

    I brought this up on another issue where someone decided it was funny to attack me with a Japanese video where they were making fun of Koreans. Of course, they didn't understand I wasn't a Conservative and as a Centrist, I was pointing out the glaring failures of Progressives... and of course, this person was a Progressive. Comparing our public educational system to Communism or Socialism is actually a true assessment because once the teachers unions and Progressives took over, we went from the best public school system in the world to one of the worst.

    And what's worse about this is that the left pays a heavier price for this because an Atheist isn't going to enroll a child in a religious school and Atheist or not, most leftwingers who believe in separation of church and state won't do it either. That leaves private education which also contradicts their ideological beliefs where all children should be enrolled in school and have the same opportunity for advancement... well, they do in our public schools if advancement is defined by having a first grade level education in the seventh grade.

    The promise of public education was to give our children every opportunity to excel and I am extremely grateful for the Liberals who came to power in the 1960's who forced our children into school taking them out of the fields and grinding poverty like my mother endured working in the fields alongside her 14 other siblings... that's right, my grandmother had 15 kids and would have been Pro Life in her views at that time because at a nickle a day living in poverty, the kids actually earned more than what it cost to feed them and it allowed them to buy 40 acres of land and a house they built with their own hands because the kids paid for the food and my grandfathers income was free to at least make them well to do dirt farmers. But because of the Liberals, 10 of these kids were put back in school and the grinding poverty, which rightwing Democrats caused through programs like segregation which helped only about a third of whites while hurting the rest like it did blacks, came to an end.

    But between the 60's and the 80's, the Liberals became changed from within by Progressives and Socialists. Our public educational system deteriorated and was clearly no longer providing a top education as the costs of putting so many children in school wasn't fully being provided for. Children were reading from third grade English books in the eighth grade in some schools because there was nothing else to teach from. The teachers did very little to encourage the students spending three minutes to give the days lesson and then retiring behind their desk for the rest of the class doing crossword puzzles and personal finances... and it's even worse today with computers as some classes it's as if the teacher is nothing but a hall monitor telling the students what subject to pull up and then simply watching from their desk to make sure there's no tomfoolery going on but having kept their lazy asses sitting behind the desk the entire class period.

    Literally put, kids in third world nations with chalk slates being taught in a grass hut are getting a better education than our children in public education with the best computers and software available costing us thousands of dollars when a school textbook would cost far less by comparison... even worse, some schools mandate what computers and software you must buy and it's often the most expensive there is when there are lower cost alternatives they won't let your children have if they're to attend classes.

    No, I don't agree with Mr Pro Life and I think the mans a lunatic.

    I do think our public schools need an overhaul from top to bottom, Progressives need tarred and feathered for what they did to the system and run out of town on a rail... and we need to focus on education with some common sense regulations where every schools budget must be proven, investigations mandated should any public school be found suspicious or wasteful and that teachers unions only deal with issues like salaries with no authority over how teachers are required to do their jobs which is why so many are among the laziest employed Americans in the country.

    Teachers forget that while they think they can trick parents by making deals with students and so forth when parents are coming by for a visit that those parents were once students as well... they know the teachers games and that's why very few parents of children enrolled in public education have any respect for teachers at all.

    States like Arkansas have passed laws where if your child misses more than three days of school, you are penalized $250.00 a day. In Alabama, if your child is late too often for school, they can legally take your child away from you and put them in a reformatory during the simple making life that much more peachy for working parents who have to leave for work before their child leaves for school so that if the bus driver is to blame for not waiting, your child is legally removed from your care even if they pass their subjects and at school every day... just late. These whack jobs want to send your child before a court of law because they write on their desk or say something defamatory... that's what happens when you strip the school of every option they have to punish your child for disobedience because of your social views.

    There are some who want to merge our public and private schools... that's not going to happen because it gives government a say in how these schools will be managed and things like separation of church and state mean most who have their children in private or religious schools aren't about to allow that to happen as the reason they pay so much to put them in private schools when many can barely afford it is because the public schools are such a mess... and they're not about to give the people who ruined public education any say over their childrens education.

    To be brutally honest, public education is the greatest proof that Progressives and Socialists are destroying this country as Liberals themselves aren't really the ones at fault save for allowing the Progressives and Socialists to get away with calling themselves Liberals to the point Liberals don't know who they are anymore. The only true Liberals remaining today are Neocons who are essentially rightwing Liberals who split from leftwing Liberals during the Great Depression blaming Socialists and Progressives for the economic crisis. When Irving Kristol reinvented them, they at first called themselves Paleoliberals but the press coined the term Neoconservative about them preferring to keep calling what they had been calling themselves before Kristol as all Neoconservative means is New Conservatives. The name New Conservative comes from the fact that Conservatives originally began as Conservative Liberals before dropping the name Liberal as the Liberals shifted to the extreme left... thus, the rightwing Liberals were following in the Conservatives footsteps. They shifted parties and became Republicans in the late 60's after having helped JFK become President giving him their support but opposing LBJ who became a supporter of the political left. Most in Kristols day fully understood that the Neocons were Liberals and they were defined as Liberals who had a sense of reality vs leftwing Liberals who were already revealing they had lost sense with reality becoming more Progressive than Liberal in their ideological beliefs.

    Just like the left snowballed us into thinking that Martin Luther King jr was a lifelong Democrat so that even Black History Month taught that lie for decades, the public educational system dumbed us down about political ideologies even failing to educate us as to who the Neocons are... yet do any research on your own on the Neocons beliefs and their origins and you'll find it clearly stated they are Liberals also which may be the real reason the Republicans have been so successful over the past 40 years vs Democrats... because Republicans have all the true Liberals and Conservatives in their party and Conservative / Moderate Democrats are the only ones who know who they are in the Democratic Party.

    Public education is important for our children and what once was the promise of helping every child get the best education possible has become a sad pathetic joke of lies and broken promises where they could do better if you put them in a library to educate themselves or have their parents do it which if they had more time and trust to educate their own children... even they could do better than public education as has been proven time and time again.

    Maybe Mr Pro Life is a madman... but even he's right that if we can't do better than this that maybe public education should be abolished and every parent given a voucher to put their child in any private or religious school they want... or teach them at home which could help some poor families get ahead as long as their children pass required testing for academics to retain that voucher for home schooling.
    (more)
  • breaker chaoski... 2010/11/02 16:35:55
  • Diane 2010/11/02 14:50:10
    No
    Diane
    +2
    I hope he keeps running forever. He'll take votes away from viable Republican candidates.
  • Vieuphoria 2010/11/02 14:45:03
    No
    Vieuphoria
    HTe guy would clearly be a moron.... so no :)
  • breaker 2010/11/02 14:41:41
  • bnbun 2010/11/02 14:23:38
    No
    bnbun
    +2
    15 kids? Hm. I wonder what would happen if every couple in the world had 15 kids...
  • chaoski... bnbun 2010/11/02 15:12:53 (edited)
    chaoskitty123
    +1
    My grandmother had 15 kids and the difference between them is very telling as they came about during the late 40's through early 60's. The first group were poorly educated because they had to work in the fields while the second half benefited from the political left creating reforms that ended the grinding poverty of the South so they all went to school. The first half all put family first but went through divorces due to all the changes in society... their children, however, came out pretty well rounded and the one uncle from this group who stayed married went into the military and retired with honors living up north in Connecticut making his own planes having put all his kids through college. The second half who all went through high school stayed married for the most part but not one of their kids made anything of themselves all either being dropouts, drug addicts, dependent on government aid or working dead end jobs. None of them have any successful marriages, their own children are completely lost and you would swear we were living back in the 1940's again as poor as these kids all are... but not one of them did any work growing up and none of them have any desire to better themselves as long as the governments there with it's safety net. My generation in the family came ...

    My grandmother had 15 kids and the difference between them is very telling as they came about during the late 40's through early 60's. The first group were poorly educated because they had to work in the fields while the second half benefited from the political left creating reforms that ended the grinding poverty of the South so they all went to school. The first half all put family first but went through divorces due to all the changes in society... their children, however, came out pretty well rounded and the one uncle from this group who stayed married went into the military and retired with honors living up north in Connecticut making his own planes having put all his kids through college. The second half who all went through high school stayed married for the most part but not one of their kids made anything of themselves all either being dropouts, drug addicts, dependent on government aid or working dead end jobs. None of them have any successful marriages, their own children are completely lost and you would swear we were living back in the 1940's again as poor as these kids all are... but not one of them did any work growing up and none of them have any desire to better themselves as long as the governments there with it's safety net. My generation in the family came from the older group and we all tried to make something of ourselves. In my case, a quack doctor put me on medications that aren't supposed to be mixed and I lost everything I had fighting to keep my job and stay employed until with nothing left I was forced to either starve to death or finally accept government assistance which even then took me over two years to get so my health worsened... but I am far from a typical government aid recipient and I do my best to help others who are struggling since I don't have a family. I tried to get work but guess what... Big Brother wouldn't help me because being a white male there's just not as many programs designed to help me. Lol, even churches refused to help me because I am a male so my opinion of them is even worse since they're the ones speaking about God helping their fellow man and charity so they wouldn't even help with medication I needed for diabetes... maybe that will give you an idea why this was so bad for me and my health deteriorated.

    Having 15 kids provides a good way to measure the changes in society and as for his name, he calls himself Mr Pro Life but at least he chose his own weird name instead of idiots like Michael Jackson who named his daughter Blanket so she'll grow up traumatized and maybe change it when she's old enough... strangely enough, many of the people here attacking him probably think Jackson had the right to name his daughter what he did.
    (more)
  • chamcha... chaoski... 2010/11/02 15:36:25
    chamchamgal
    Having 15 kids is a good way of getting on welfare.
  • merlinskiss 2010/11/02 14:03:14 (edited)
    No
    merlinskiss
    +1
    Nope. No way! The man has no idea how ignorant that looks and sounds.
  • skip 2010/11/02 13:59:21
    No
    skip
    +1
    just other dumb man telling women how to live
  • Ellen H 2010/11/02 13:58:35
    No
    Ellen H
    +2
    You cannot abort out of 'your own' womb...you must wait until it calls you "Mother" for eighteen years..then Mr Pro-Life and Big Daddy War-Bucks, will abort your baby for ewe on HIS Battle Fields and hand brainwashed mothers a Con-Gray-shun-ill Met-ill of On-Her (Gray=brain cells)
  • merlins... Ellen H 2010/11/02 14:05:37
    merlinskiss
    +1
    Unfortunately, you are right.
  • sodabox 2010/11/02 13:37:57
    No
    sodabox
    +15
    People would vote for this guy? That's even scarier then him!

    Want to know who gets abortions?
    42% have income below $10k
    27% have income of $10-$20k
    That’s 69% have income below $20k
    91% occur in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy
    75% say they cannot afford to have it
    65% say they are christian.
    You really want to force these women to have their babies? Really?

    91 percent are performed during the first trimester (12 or fewer weeks' gestation)
    9 percent are performed in the second trimester (24 or fewer weeks' gestation)
    0.01 percent (only about 100 per year) are performed in the third trimester (more than 24 weeks' gestation)

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/21 15:53:55

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals