Would you let the govt put a CAMERA in your house??!!
BlueRepublican
2012/05/04 16:03:06
|
|
|||||
|
3 votes
|
|
2% | ||
|
96 votes
|
|
77% | ||
|
5 votes
|
|
4% | ||
|
20 votes
|
|
16% | ||
I know what you're thinking, "C'mon Blue, that'll NEVER happen." But let's think about that for a minute.
Let's say that to prevent Domestic and Child Abuse there was a bill called the Protect Women and Children Act. No legislator or politician would DARE vote against protecting women and children. The bill passes with overwhelming bipartisan support.
The bill stipulates the use of home surveillance as a means of protecting the innocent. The cameras will be federally funded and maintained by govt techs which will create jobs. Failure to comply will result in arrest and $5,000 fine everyday the system is not installed.
The entire National Security Community would rally around the bill calling it, "A necessary tool in the fight against terrorism." It would be linked to 911 Emergency services, Department of Homeland Security, and monitored 24/7.
But you say, "Wait a minute Blue, what about my rights??!!"
You already gave away your bank accounts, credit cards, emails, phone conversations, letters, free speech, privacy and habeous corpus, so why not?
Don't you want to stop Domestic Abuse and Child Abuse? Do you want the terrorist to WIN?
You've done nothing wrong. You don't want any trouble. You can't afford to pay the penalty. You also don't want to let Domestic and Child Abuse go unpunished. What would you do?
Would you let the govt put a CAMERA in your house??!!
Let's say that to prevent Domestic and Child Abuse there was a bill called the Protect Women and Children Act. No legislator or politician would DARE vote against protecting women and children. The bill passes with overwhelming bipartisan support.
The bill stipulates the use of home surveillance as a means of protecting the innocent. The cameras will be federally funded and maintained by govt techs which will create jobs. Failure to comply will result in arrest and $5,000 fine everyday the system is not installed.
The entire National Security Community would rally around the bill calling it, "A necessary tool in the fight against terrorism." It would be linked to 911 Emergency services, Department of Homeland Security, and monitored 24/7.
But you say, "Wait a minute Blue, what about my rights??!!"
You already gave away your bank accounts, credit cards, emails, phone conversations, letters, free speech, privacy and habeous corpus, so why not?
Don't you want to stop Domestic Abuse and Child Abuse? Do you want the terrorist to WIN?
You've done nothing wrong. You don't want any trouble. You can't afford to pay the penalty. You also don't want to let Domestic and Child Abuse go unpunished. What would you do?
Would you let the govt put a CAMERA in your house??!!
Top Opinion
-
Bucky aka KINGPIN 2012/05/04 17:09:45
That being said the technology is out there already and they don't need you to put it in your home. It's called infrared and any "public" camera with pan/tilt/zoom could be redirected to see inside any building. Police already use this stuff in some of their mobile units.
Big Sis Rolls Out Surveillance Drones
May 3, 2012
Source: AP
The federal government’s unmanned drones patrolling the U.S.-Canadian border are venturing into Washington’s airspace.
In testimony before a U.S. Senate panel last week, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said northern border surveillance using unmanned aerial aircraft now expands from North Dakota to Eastern Washington.
The two 10,000-pound Predator-B unmanned aircraft based in Grand Forks, N.D., have a 950-mile coverage range and “do enter Washington airspace, in the vicinity of Spokane,” Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman Gina Gray said Thursday.
Read More...
http://www.blacklistednews.co...
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
I don't have the article handy to show you where they are being flown. If I recall correctly there are 63 launch sites, so far. There is very little that is private anymore.
President Obama signs Executive Order allowing for control over all US resources
www.examiner.com
On March 16th, President Obama signed a new Executive Order which expands upon a prior order issued in 1950 for Disaster Preparedness,
http://www.examiner.com/artic...
Good wake-up question for the really asleep, though.
We are Ruled, you know.