Would Romney be the "front runner" if the "liberal media" didn't IGNORE Ron Paul?

by DDogbreath Posted 2012/08/20 20:10:14

Related Topics: Ron Paul, Conservative, Patriots, Media, Romney, Campaign, Talk Show, Image, Primary, Images, Blackout, Liberty, SodaHead, Liberal

Read More

59 votes
Read all 292 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Ron Paul would be way out front	40 votes	68%
	Romney would be in the lead anyway	8 votes	14%
	Undecided	11 votes	19%

Can you say "MEDIA BLACKOUT"?

How can American Patriots stand for this kind of travesty?

We didn't see much of this during the primary's did you?

media blackout american patriots travesty primarys

media blackout american patriots travesty primarys

You didn't see any of this now did you?

We already hear Romney Supporters whining about the "Liberal media"

Let's face it Romney wouldn't be where he is today without them.

Ever wonder why?

+18

Add a comment above

irish -liberty or death! 2012/08/20 23:33:06

Ron Paul would be way out front

+10
romney is as plastic as they come. he outdoes obama,isn't that amazing?
>> See Replies

More polls by DDogbreath

Seeker62 2012/08/27 19:20:59

Romney would be in the lead anyway

The truth is that Romney is the person the Republican Party leadership chose and that's the only choice that matters. What the republican rank and file want is nothing more than a nuisance. And you can be sure that the RNC rules committee will make sure that it will not be possible in the future for anything like this little uprising that the Ron Paul forces have shown to ever happen again. Just like after Ross Perot got almost 20% of the vote the Republican's and Democrats got together to make sure there would never be another "Ross Perot" type in the Presidential debates. The whole system is designed to make the American people believe we have freedom of choice in our elections while the reality is that our choices are tightly controlled by those in power and we are only allowed to see, hear or vote for whom they allow us to.

reply
DDogbreath to Seeker62 2012/08/28 20:40:34

There will be another revolution. It is our only hope.

reply
Seeker62 to Seeker62 2012/08/28 21:52:14

+1
Told you so!!!

reply
DDogbreath to Seeker62 2012/08/28 21:56:16

What a joke.

http://www.c-span.org/RNC/Live/

reply
gregaj7 2012/08/22 01:58:24

Ron Paul would be way out front

+3
In a 'fair' campaign, Ron Paul would completely landslide Both Mitt and Barack. It would be Andrew Jackson all over again, and the Rothschilds would rather destroy the planet than allow that.

reply
Rick4Ron - Paul☮2012 2012/08/22 01:15:07

Ron Paul would be way out front

+3
The corporate owned media, both liberal and neoconservative, has marginalized Ron Paul, in three presidential elections... because he is right! Even with that hurdle, he has polled better than Obama and Romney in polling reflecting all political affiliations. Clearly, he would be America's candidate, in a general election.

~~~Dr. Paul is the only real republican running for the republican nomination. However, he would be formidable and in my opinion... prevail... in a general election.

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals -- if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is."

RONALD REAGAN, Reason Magazine, Jul. 1, 1975

~~~Where does the mainstream media, or Obama, or even Romney advocate for a government supporting these basic principles?

"I'm convinced that today the majority of Americans want what those first Americans wanted: A better life for ...

The corporate owned media, both liberal and neoconservative, has marginalized Ron Paul, in three presidential elections... because he is right! Even with that hurdle, he has polled better than Obama and Romney in polling reflecting all political affiliations. Clearly, he would be America's candidate, in a general election.

~~~Dr. Paul is the only real republican running for the republican nomination. However, he would be formidable and in my opinion... prevail... in a general election.

"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism. I think conservatism is really a misnomer just as liberalism is a misnomer for the liberals -- if we were back in the days of the Revolution, so-called conservatives today would be the Liberals and the liberals would be the Tories. The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom and this is a pretty general description also of what libertarianism is."

RONALD REAGAN, Reason Magazine, Jul. 1, 1975

~~~Where does the mainstream media, or Obama, or even Romney advocate for a government supporting these basic principles?

"I'm convinced that today the majority of Americans want what those first Americans wanted: A better life for themselves and their children; a minimum of government authority. Very simply, they want to be left alone in peace and safety to take care of the family by earning an honest dollar and putting away some savings. This may not sound too exciting, but there is something magnificent about it. On the farm, on the street corner, in the factory and in the kitchen, millions of us ask nothing more, but certainly nothing less than to live our own lives according to our values — at peace with ourselves, our neighbors and the world."

RONALD REAGAN, televised address, Jul. 6, 1976

The problem of Big government, over regulation, a debased currency, and centralized control continues. Moreover, Obama/Romney, with their quest to be Kings... will make sure of it!

Give me a president who follows, and protects the rules of the Republic. Not one, who will rule over us, through executive order, foreign lobbyist, United Nation edicts... and the cronyism of the profiteers, at the expense of the American taxpayer.

Ron Paul 2012
(more)

reply
DDogbreath to Rick4Ro... 2012/08/22 05:21:52

+1

reply
Katfish 2012/08/22 00:20:20

Ron Paul would be way out front

+3
When his popularity wasn't ignored, he was marginalized.

reply
Molly P 2012/08/21 15:06:08

Ron Paul would be way out front

+6
The msm is not only to blame. The RNC is just as much responsible as the media! Americans are going to lay down and let the RNC tell them who to vote for and they are falling in line!

reply
Arizona1950 2012/08/21 13:18:33

Ron Paul would be way out front

+7
no doubt in my mind.

reply
9th of 9 2012/08/21 12:27:00

Ron Paul would be way out front

+6
Here, let him tell you.

reply
DDogbreath to 9th of 9 2012/08/21 14:00:21

+4
The Republican party has lost it's way. They have become sheeple just like Obama supporters.

reply
9th of 9 to DDogbreath 2012/08/21 14:49:25

+4
Neo Con Progressive Global Loyalist Sheeple at that.

reply
Rick4Ro... to 9th of 9 2012/08/21 23:59:51

+4
What a wonderful smack-down! I never get tired of listening to this response, and the truth behind it. It is a perfect example of the "Fix" being in, as usual.

reply
9th of 9 to Rick4Ro... 2012/08/23 21:13:38

+2
Would you not just love to smack the smirk off McCains face?

reply
Lady Whitewolf 2012/08/21 09:51:20

Undecided

Probably....

But it's always
"Libby" this
"Libby" that
"Libby" something else....

Can't you people FIND ANOTHER LINE???

reply
DDogbreath to Lady Wh... 2012/08/21 14:01:38

+5
Are you denying that ALL the main stream media isn't under liberal control?

reply
Lady Wh... to DDogbreath 2012/08/21 20:56:06

+1
YES

reply
Rick4Ro... to DDogbreath 2012/08/21 23:47:42

+4
In fairness, the Rupert Murdoch/NewsCorp owned media group that owns FOX, would have to be considered the FOX Neocon Network.

Left wing... right wing... a Ron Paul presidency would be a threat to their well-honed political connections in both parties.

Since Ron Paul, has proven he cannot be bought... it would not serve the media, and their connections.

We have seen what they do to those who don't follow the corporate directions, when they removed Judge Nap.

reply
Rick4Ro... to Lady Wh... 2012/08/21 23:55:11

+4
Most Ron Paul supporters are against the liberal progressive agenda, as well as the neoconservative progressive agenda. Admittedly, most of us lean to the conservative side. However, the republican party has deserted the principles of the Old-school republicans, like Goldwater/Taft... and even Reagan.

We are frustrated with the rights foreign agenda, and the lack of fiscal conservatism, we feel are necessary to reduce the debt, and prevent a depression... and potentially, much more.

If ever, we needed a third-party, to unite the factions who are sick of the failed liberal/conservative paradigm... it is now!

I agree with your "Libby" suggestion. Because "The problems" are the child of both parties.

reply
DDogbreath to Rick4Ro... 2012/08/22 05:24:12

I was always interested in what William F Buckley had to say.

reply
ConLibF... to Lady Wh... 2012/08/22 06:42:27

+1
Where in this post can I find
"Libby" this
"Libby" that
"Libby" something else....

It is you who refuses to see there is only 1 party.

reply
DDogbreath to ConLibF... 2012/08/22 19:08:17

+1

reply
ConLibF... to DDogbreath 2012/08/22 19:35:21

+1
Oh there it is!!! :)

reply
DDogbreath to ConLibF... 2012/08/22 19:43:13

+1

reply
Dan ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/08/21 09:09:28

Ron Paul would be way out front

+3
The problem was not Ron Paul. Its the fact that collectivists are in control of most of the power centers of this nation. The media is owned by 6 major corporations all controlled by the CFR. The political parties' main contributors are Major banks and corporations that benefit from globalist government policy - the banks benefiting from the federal reserve, a central bank called for by the communist manifesto. Schools have been corrupted by tax free foundations that have begun consolidating power into the department of education, also called for by the communist manifesto. I could go on about how collectivists have they hands in everything in this country, but the point is that as long as they are in control, it will be extremely difficult for anyone of real integrity to take office in this country.

reply
DDogbreath to Dan ☮ R... 2012/08/21 14:05:01

+2
I think you are giving these douche bags they are touting too much credit by saying "anyone of real integrity". I would replace that with "someone with any integrity".

reply
ed 2012/08/21 09:05:32

Ron Paul would be way out front

+1
No way

reply
sean 2012/08/21 06:15:37

Ron Paul would be way out front

+5
the reason the MSM, stopped doing polls after the debates, because paul beat them all by landslides, the biggest truth was never told..ron paul was the only one who beat obama, in a general election..he beat obama by 2%, while all the rest lost to obama by 4% or more..also their was massive voter fraud in the rep. nom. process, people complained, paul could not..due to not wanting to sound like sour grapes, they just announced they will not seat 16 of his delegates from mass..so what does this all tell you, either romney doesn't want to win or if he does, nothing will change

reply
DDogbreath to sean 2012/08/21 14:07:06

+3

reply
☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/08/21 04:11:30 (edited)

Romney would be in the lead anyway

Because the Republican party has moved so far to the left all we seem to be able to put up is a liberal anymore.

reply
DDogbreath to ☆stillt... 2012/08/21 04:26:13

+4
That is not the key to victory unfortunately.

reply
sean to ☆stillt... 2012/08/21 06:27:14

+4
ask yourself..why is that ? follow the money..the richest family in the world..THE ROTHSCHILDS..est. 300-900 TRILLION..and you thought it was gates or buffet..read about the rothschilds..then you will start to understand

reply
☆stillt... to sean 2012/08/21 06:35:37

+1
Actually I have already read about them. They are the masters of the puppet masters. They put people in power and take them out. It is believed they are the ones that really took out Kennedy, but no one can prove it.

reply
sean to ☆stillt... 2012/08/21 15:18:04

+2
of course they can prove it..but won't..connect GHW bush to JFK..and who was pres. on 911 his kid..do you know the rothschilds just built the new israeli surpreme courthouse..loaded with ley lines, an inverted cross at the bottom of the stairs, to trample on..and many, many more features..look it up, the rothschilds are the head of the illuminalti..and while they pretend to be zionists..their really satanists..its all a game, that has been played before

reply
☆stillt... to sean 2012/08/21 16:56:26 (edited)

+1
Sean do you have a site in mind as there a 100's of site on the Rothschild. I saw one video some months ago on connection of them to the death of Kennedy, but the evidence was a little loose.
Thank You

reply
Dan der Mensch 2012/08/21 04:02:26

Undecided

+4
I have no idea how Romney was ever chosen to be the front runner. Clearly the GOP doesn't care much about conservative values, but rather just getting back in power again.

reply
9th of 9 to Dan der... 2012/08/23 21:18:10

+3
Right. It has nothing to do with Article 4 Section 4, and everthing to do with the "R"

reply
zapped 2012/08/21 03:39:40

Ron Paul would be way out front

+5
shows the media is pushing the agenda of the NWO .and who there wanting or soetoro .
seems (soetoro,,or odumbo ) there 2 peas in a pod !

and NOT what's best for america !

reply
Idiot repubs 2012/08/21 03:06:20

Undecided

Obama beats them both.

reply