Would it be fair if only those who voted for Obama are held responsible for paying the bills caused by supporting Obama's policies regarding illegal aliens and abortion?
tncdel
2012/07/15 20:42:45
|
|
|||||
|
31 votes
|
|
89% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
11% | |||
For example, illegal aliens have bankrupted over a hundred hospitals in California alone. And Obama has been trying to attract even more job-stealing illegals here with amnesty, work permits, "free" healthcare and everything else. He even wants to give them college at taxpayer expense!
But what if you could obtain a receipt in the voting booth proving you didn't vote for Obama, and only those who rubber-stamped the costs of his agendas held accountable for paying the costs thereof. Wouldn't that be fair?
That way only those who approve of Obama giving college to illegals [or paying to have babies killed because their female parents don't want their social life cramped by having to hire babysitters or males don't want to pay child support] will actually have to pay for it.
For comparison, if someone else orders a pizza for you that you didn't order and don't want, should you have to pay for that pizza?
But what if you could obtain a receipt in the voting booth proving you didn't vote for Obama, and only those who rubber-stamped the costs of his agendas held accountable for paying the costs thereof. Wouldn't that be fair?
That way only those who approve of Obama giving college to illegals [or paying to have babies killed because their female parents don't want their social life cramped by having to hire babysitters or males don't want to pay child support] will actually have to pay for it.
For comparison, if someone else orders a pizza for you that you didn't order and don't want, should you have to pay for that pizza?
Top Opinion
-
Reichstolz 2012/07/15 21:36:01YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...
+6Considering it is only crony capitalists and those too ignorant to be productive, support obama, we know it won't happen.
More polls by tncdel
Sort By
- Fredrick House 2012/07/23 14:44:32YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...
You broke it you bought it! If you want all of Obama's Marxist "giveaways", then you need to pay in a meaningful way. Say, If you want to be on public assistance then you shouldn't be able to vote for 4 years minimum while on public assistance. If you get free Obamacare, it should be like an airline, "no frills" will get you there safely but you might have to wait and have other non life threatening limitations place on it. No Taxxee! No voteee!! And while we are at it, sneaking into the country illegally shouldn't give your or your offspring born here an immediate path to citizenship and all its full pay benefits.reply - electricsheep 2012/07/16 20:18:30YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...Can I get my money back for the Iraq War?reply
- TheTruth1313 2012/07/16 06:56:16YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+1I have to admit that I like this idea. LOLreply
- Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/07/16 05:11:20YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+1Fair's fair, and isn't that what they've all been bitching about, this "fair share"?reply
- Maria R 2012/07/16 02:55:03YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+1I wish! This would be SOOO nice!reply
- Balladeer-PWCM-POTL 2012/07/16 02:30:28YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+1because TRAITORS need to PAY or be Punished....
reply - Mean Mommy 2012/07/16 02:07:38YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+1I would love to see this, maybe they will have one of those "awwwwww" minutes and change their minds to see that government is to big and stealing America's money every time they come up with one of these brain gas leaks!reply
- words to live by 2012/07/16 02:04:45YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+1Someone has it, someone want's it, but the latter does not want to work for it.reply
- Gordon 2012/07/15 23:46:56YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+2That is an awesome idea! Force people to put their money where their mouths are. That would be novel for people who want others to pay for their liberalism.reply
- Faith ~American Patriot~ 2012/07/15 22:45:17 (edited)YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+3Wait, you actually want them to PAY for something? Like, with THEIR OWN money? This is not a concept they will understand. They're used to just taking, taking, taking.reply
- mich52 2012/07/15 22:21:06NO, I think those opposed to Obama's agendas should pay for them too [explain...Face it the GOP administrations are responsible for most of our current deficit..
reply - Faith ~... mich52 2012/07/15 22:46:29+3You obviously did not read the question. Why don't you try again.reply
-
+1Apparently pled the 5th. :)~reply
- Diane S... Faith ~... 2012/07/16 13:54:28+1An answerfor mich52------When President Obama took office in 2009, he said that he “will be held accountable.” He added that he would turn around the failing American economy within his first term and get the country back on track. Obama concluded, “If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.”reply
- CUDDLY BUT STILL CRABBY 2012/07/15 21:58:08YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+5If we don't implode first, there may come a time that there will be two Americas.reply
- Gordon CUDDLY ... 2012/07/15 23:48:50+2I will will go with the CSA.
reply - Sgt Major B 2012/07/15 21:56:39YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+4Sounds like a plan!reply
- Reggie☮ 2012/07/15 21:53:40YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+4That's the perfect plan.reply
- Diane Spraggs Yates 2012/07/15 21:40:52YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+5Sounds good to me !!!!reply
- Reichstolz 2012/07/15 21:36:01YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+6Considering it is only crony capitalists and those too ignorant to be productive, support obama, we know it won't happen.reply
- none 2012/07/15 21:34:37YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+6Fools should pay the price for their foolishness.reply
- Captain Kirk~POTL 2012/07/15 21:12:54 (edited)YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+5ABSOLUTELY, they wanted the loser,they should pay for the loser!! It`s a shame most of them are on welfare so this is impossible!!reply
- frank 2012/07/15 21:03:42YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+6I thing that would be funny and I would like to see it, only it’s never going to happen. As much as I dislike his policies he is still POTUS and Americans pay for his mistakes.reply
- Captain... frank 2012/07/15 21:14:20+4Most of the assclowns that voted him in are on welfare so this is obviously impossible!!reply
- frank Captain... 2012/07/16 15:27:28+1Soo right.reply
- Captain... frank 2012/07/16 18:04:42I thank you,Sir!
reply - The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk 2012/07/15 20:52:58NO, I think those opposed to Obama's agendas should pay for them too [explain...We all have to pay for the fuct up economic policies left behind by W. Although, maybe secession is the way to go, split the country in complete half, and see who fairs better. I can't think of one historical example that may debunk my theory.reply
-
+1Wouldn't it be a huge improvement if things were no worse than they were under Bush? Can you distinguish progress from regress?reply
- The Eli... tncdel 2012/07/15 21:45:18What would be a huge improvement, would be for our "leaders" to sit down and discuss what really needs to be done instead of pointing the fingers at one another. Not being distracted by social issues, or who's surrogate said the newest dumbest thing on CNN, Meet The Press, or Face The Nation.reply
- Stryder 2012/07/15 20:49:04YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+4I don't know if it's fair or not (and I really wouldn't care if it wasn't), but I think that's a hell of an idea.reply
-
+2Let's ask our legislators to introduce a law "opt out."reply
- say what? 2012/07/15 20:48:50YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+4Sounds fair to me.reply
- Nimitz 2012/07/15 20:46:51YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+3I think that'd be a brilliant idea across the board. Let those who make bad choices pay for them themselves. What ya wanna bet people would make 'progressively' better choices from then on out? The problem with 'democracy' is that the people who rob you never have to do the time one normally associates with such an act.reply
- NPC 2012/07/15 20:46:26 (edited)YES, only those who actually vote for Obama's agendas should have to pay for ...+4Abortion will be difficult to repeal. Don't count on that one. WE can repeal ObamaCare and the limited Amnesty for the 800,000 invaders. Great idea but we are all stuck with most of Barack's, Pelosi's and Reid's massive spending, bailouts and taxation schemes the past 4 years. Much can be repealed in Reconciliaton if the GOP takes back the Senate and elects Romney.reply
-
+2I disagree with you regarding abortion. Back in the early 70's with the women's Lib movement in full swing, Roe v. Wade barely squeaked past into law 5-4. Now the tide has shifted, so that the majority of voters are opposed to abortion and / or at least opposed to paying for it. So next time the Supreme Court may very well reverse Roe by the same 5-4 margin. Especially if Romney appoints two Supreme Court justices.reply
- NPC tncdel 2012/07/15 21:20:55+2Am against abortion. Wish abortion and religion were not political issues.reply
-
I'm not into religion. But I deem human life sacred, and believe no one has the right to "play God" with the life of another. Only in matters of self-defense or in defense of others is the taking of human life ethical.reply
- gregory.ditzler 2012/07/15 20:44:08NO, I think those opposed to Obama's agendas should pay for them too [explain...+2That deal isn't fair, then how about only those who vote for Obama benefit from his economic plan?reply
-
+1I'm cool with that. Let them "benefit" from what the others who voted for him furnish.reply
- gregory... tncdel 2012/07/15 20:47:27+2That means no preexisting conditions and cheap affordable health insurance. That would actually help Obama win the election.reply
1
2
Next »
Last »
