Too many miss the point of the anti-Obama movement
He was NOT elected because of his experience, wisdom, or time spent in the Senate.
He was basically elected because of his race.
** The majority of blacks voted for him only because he's black.
** Many whites voted for him, hoping to bridge the racial divide.
** And some voted for him because he sounded really smart, uttering all the right catch phrases.
But something funny happened down the road....people started waking up to what he really is....a hard-left socialist with radical views/policies and the majority....I repeat...the MAJORITY of the voting population don't like the direction he taking us. He wants to reduce the USA that of Europe...before pulling the trigger on that....do some honest research and you'll see the grass isn't greener on the other side.
There's a 'reason' why so many people from other countries try to migrate to the USA, let's not destroy that reason
Would blacks vote for Obama if he were white and his opponent were black?
Mr. T
2012/05/28 11:22:08
|
|
|||||
|
140 votes
|
|
64% | |||
|
38 votes
|
|
17% | |||
|
41 votes
|
|
19% | |||
What do you think? It is the general consensus that the majority of blacks, not all, voted for Obama BECAUSE he is black and no other reason. And continue supporting him BECAUSE he is black, regardless of his failed presidency.
Here we go again...
The unprecedented diversity of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rates of minority eligible voters.
The levels of participation by black, Hispanic and Asian eligible voters all increased from 2004 to 2008, reducing the voter participation gap between themselves and white eligible voters. This was particularly true for black eligible voters. Their voter turnout rate increased 4.9 percentage points, from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.3% in 2008, nearly matching the voter turnout rate of white eligible voters (66.1%). For Hispanics, participation levels also increased, with the voter turnout rate rising 2.7 percentage points, from 47.2% in 2004 to 49.9% in 2008. Among Asians, voter participation rates increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2008. Meanwhile, among white eligible voters, the voter turnout rate fell slightly, from 67.2% in 2004 to 66.1% in 2008.
There was only a 4.5% bump for Obama, which equated to 2 million more votes for him. As I stated; the numbers show it is obvious that the Black community in recent times vote predominantly for the Democrats. In addition you can see there was a bump in almost every other group and they as well vot...
Here we go again...
The unprecedented diversity of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rates of minority eligible voters.
The levels of participation by black, Hispanic and Asian eligible voters all increased from 2004 to 2008, reducing the voter participation gap between themselves and white eligible voters. This was particularly true for black eligible voters. Their voter turnout rate increased 4.9 percentage points, from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.3% in 2008, nearly matching the voter turnout rate of white eligible voters (66.1%). For Hispanics, participation levels also increased, with the voter turnout rate rising 2.7 percentage points, from 47.2% in 2004 to 49.9% in 2008. Among Asians, voter participation rates increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2008. Meanwhile, among white eligible voters, the voter turnout rate fell slightly, from 67.2% in 2004 to 66.1% in 2008.
There was only a 4.5% bump for Obama, which equated to 2 million more votes for him. As I stated; the numbers show it is obvious that the Black community in recent times vote predominantly for the Democrats. In addition you can see there was a bump in almost every other group and they as well voted for Obama in larger numbers. Not by an extremely large margin, but enough to give him a clear win.
Al Gore received 92% of the Black vote
John Kerry 90%
Bill Clinton 90% twice
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1...
Black voters turned out to vote for a 1/2 black man simply because of his skin color without knowing jacksh!t about him. Pay close attention to the video
Here we go with the videos of three people being talked to by a Shock Jock.
That is like me doing this:
Now tell me what does that prove?
In addition my stats are factual; you're just peddling propaganda to make yourself feel better.
The unprecedented diversity of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rates of minority eligible voters.
The levels of participation by black, Hispanic and Asian eligible voters all increased from 2004 to 2008, reducing the voter participation gap between themselves and white eligible voters. This was particularly true for black eligible voters. Their voter turnout rate increased 4.9 percentage points, from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.3% in 2008, nearly matching the voter turnout rate of white eligible voters (66.1%). For Hispanics, participation levels also increased, with the voter turnout rate rising 2.7 percentage points, from 47.2% in 2004 to 49.9% in 2008. Among Asians, voter participation rates increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2008. Meanwhile, among white eligible voters, the voter turnout rate fell slightly, from 67.2% in 2004 to 66.1% in 2008.
There was only a 4.5% bump for Obama, which equated to 2 million more votes for him. As I stated; the numbers show it ...
Here we go with the videos of three people being talked to by a Shock Jock.
That is like me doing this:
Now tell me what does that prove?
In addition my stats are factual; you're just peddling propaganda to make yourself feel better.
The unprecedented diversity of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rates of minority eligible voters.
The levels of participation by black, Hispanic and Asian eligible voters all increased from 2004 to 2008, reducing the voter participation gap between themselves and white eligible voters. This was particularly true for black eligible voters. Their voter turnout rate increased 4.9 percentage points, from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.3% in 2008, nearly matching the voter turnout rate of white eligible voters (66.1%). For Hispanics, participation levels also increased, with the voter turnout rate rising 2.7 percentage points, from 47.2% in 2004 to 49.9% in 2008. Among Asians, voter participation rates increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2008. Meanwhile, among white eligible voters, the voter turnout rate fell slightly, from 67.2% in 2004 to 66.1% in 2008.
There was only a 4.5% bump for Obama, which equated to 2 million more votes for him. As I stated; the numbers show it is obvious that the Black community in recent times vote predominantly for the Democrats. In addition you can see there was a bump in almost every other group and they as well voted for Obama in larger numbers. Not by an extremely large margin, but enough to give him a clear win.
Al Gore received 92% of the Black vote
John Kerry 90%
Bill Clinton 90% twice
Let's see the data from the 2010 elections when democrats got shellacked. Somehow you dismiss that, huh?
This year blacks won't be so eager to vote for barack because they know he's a fraud. He's done nothing for them and nothing for the country other than to divide us racially, economically, Ideologically, lose our standing in the world, piss off our allies and rack up unprecedented debts and deficits. I'm not buying you crap so run along and try to fool some of 0webama's dwindling supporters.
I'm betting they stay home or leave the democrat plantation altogether in November.
Good day :-)
The unprecedented diversity of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rates of minority eligible voters.
The levels of participation by black, Hispanic and Asian eligible voters all increased from 2004 to 2008, reducing the voter participation gap between themselves and white eligible voters. This was particularly true for black eligible voters. Their voter turnout rate increased 4.9 percentage points, from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.3% in 2008, nearly matching the voter turnout rate of white eligible voters (66.1%). For Hispanics, participation levels also increased, with the voter turnout rate rising 2.7 percentage points, from 47.2% in 2004 to 49.9% in 2008. Among Asians, voter participation rates increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2008. Meanwhile, among white eligible voters, the voter turnout rate fell slightly, from 67.2% in 2004 to 66.1% in 2008.
There was only a 4.5% bump for Obama, which equated to 2 million more votes for him. As I stated; the numbers show it is obvious that the Black community in recent times vote predominantly for the Democrats. In addition you can see there was a bump in almost every other group and they as well voted for Obama in larger numbers. Not by an extremely large margin, but ...
The unprecedented diversity of the electorate last year was driven by increases both in the number and in the turnout rates of minority eligible voters.
The levels of participation by black, Hispanic and Asian eligible voters all increased from 2004 to 2008, reducing the voter participation gap between themselves and white eligible voters. This was particularly true for black eligible voters. Their voter turnout rate increased 4.9 percentage points, from 60.3% in 2004 to 65.3% in 2008, nearly matching the voter turnout rate of white eligible voters (66.1%). For Hispanics, participation levels also increased, with the voter turnout rate rising 2.7 percentage points, from 47.2% in 2004 to 49.9% in 2008. Among Asians, voter participation rates increased from 44.6% in 2004 to 47.0% in 2008. Meanwhile, among white eligible voters, the voter turnout rate fell slightly, from 67.2% in 2004 to 66.1% in 2008.
There was only a 4.5% bump for Obama, which equated to 2 million more votes for him. As I stated; the numbers show it is obvious that the Black community in recent times vote predominantly for the Democrats. In addition you can see there was a bump in almost every other group and they as well voted for Obama in larger numbers. Not by an extremely large margin, but enough to give him a clear win.
Al Gore received 92% of the Black vote
John Kerry 90%
Bill Clinton 90% twice
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1...
If anyone is spinning the truth/facts it would be you and others like you.
If you spun it for real as CMackle suggest, then I guess he would think whites are racists as well because out of the 44 POTUS, 43 of them have been white. So does that mean whites are truly the one that are racists because they kept 43 white men in office before America was brave enough to vote in someone of a different race?
I wonder how they'll feel when they learn the Mitt is half Hispanic. His father was born in Mexico, so he's Mexican... Whether they like it or not, minorities will be elected. LOL!