Quantcast

Would Allen West make a good President??!!

BlueRepublican 2012/06/11 15:04:54
YES
NO
Undecided
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Another BlueRepublican quickie poll. Would Florida Republican Congressman Allen West make a good president? He is black, American and proud of being both!! He has a successful military carreer and is very popular with conservatives. What do you think? Do you Agree, disagree, or have a different opinion? Then vote now, leave a comment, share with all your friends and RAVE!!!
SOUND OFF AMERICA!!!!

herman cain ear
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Israel Icono1 2012/06/12 08:11:19
    Israel
    +2
    Thank you. :)) I see craptard has not given up. As to wine, he is oblivious to the fact, I do not drink wine, and no cheese.
  • Kaleoku... Icono1 2012/06/11 20:22:54
    Kaleokualoha
    +5
    An officer ABUSING a prisoner is a crime that forced him into retirement.
  • Icono1 Kaleoku... 2012/06/11 20:41:05
    Icono1
    +3
    So in effect the prisoner was 'abused' by the wrong person at the wrong time and West was nailed for a political crime. Different time, different place, different result.

    I'm sure the terrorist was an innocent of the world though. They always are.
  • JT For ... Icono1 2012/06/17 00:36:20
    JT For Political Reform
    +2
    Kaleokuku is a democommunist that favors the enemies situation over our own people.
  • Icono1 JT For ... 2012/06/19 13:14:51
    Icono1
    +1
    Understand.

    They lack the ability to think so they run their mouth to compensate for that short coming.
  • JT For ... Icono1 2012/06/19 19:15:18
    JT For Political Reform
    +1
    Very well said.
  • Icono1 JT For ... 2012/06/20 23:41:09
    Icono1
    +1
    Thank you.
  • JT For ... Icono1 2012/06/21 02:13:48
  • Grandbr... Icono1 2012/06/16 03:45:44
    Grandbrother
    If they do it by violating military codes of conduct and international law, then yes it's a bad thing. That's why he was fined and forced to retire. He could have taken care of his soldiers in a legal way, but chose not to. This shameful military failure has no business in the White House.
  • JT For ... Grandbr... 2012/06/17 00:37:50
    JT For Political Reform
    +1
    He happened to get where his missing men were being held and got them to safety, that is what I call doing your job as an officer, never leave anyone behind. He didn't chop off his head like the enemy was going to do to those men. Some of you people really need to get with this country instead of the enemies of this country.
  • Israel JT For ... 2012/06/17 13:36:51
    Israel
    +1
    Nicely said JT. You are a credit to your country.
  • JT For ... Israel 2012/06/18 10:53:22
    JT For Political Reform
    +1
    TY. :-)
  • Grandbr... JT For ... 2012/06/18 03:03:04
    Grandbrother
    Since when are we justifying the violation of our miltary's codes of conduct and international law by saying "well it's not like he chopped the guys head off"? We operate on the level of standards we do regardless of how low some of our enemies sink precisely because it's what sets us apart from and above them.

    My understanding of and agreement with this is what "gets me with this country". I guess I and our military just have higher standards than you where both our codes of conduct and our presidents are concerned.
  • JT For ... Grandbr... 2012/06/18 11:03:57
    JT For Political Reform
    +1
    Let's get something straight here about something none of you leftists understand. There is no army that we are fighting. They don't have blue uniforms and we have green to depict the difference between troops. This enemy hides behind women and children and use them as pawns to demoralize anything in it's path including their own people. These are evil, neanderthals that are still in the stone age and do not follow a set of rules that apply to war with other uniformed troops. They are a cancer that is destroying everything in it's path. As far as I'm concerned there is no application of codes of conduct when you are fighting billions of religious nut cases that follow no codes what so ever, will do anything to demoralize everyone that they don't agree with, that applies to nearly everyone and that is when you use what you have to stop them at any means. Code of justice is fine when you have a definitive line to use it for, but in this case there is no line. You follow that rule of thought in this skirmish and you will lose, period.
  • Grandbr... JT For ... 2012/06/18 17:37:02 (edited)
    Grandbrother
    Yes, the people we're currently fighting do all that you describe. That still does not justify the rogue use of tactics that directly violate military codes of conduct and international law. Do our tactics need to evove and adapt to the tactics of our newest enemies? Yes. Can they evolve and adapt in a way that we don't degenerate to their same, low level? Yes again. Unfortunately, West chose to lower himself and drag the U.S. military's reputation down with him through his actions. To now consider that man for President is wildly inappropriate.
  • JT For ... Grandbr... 2012/06/18 17:51:23
  • Grandbr... JT For ... 2012/06/18 18:53:01 (edited)
    Grandbrother
    This latest reply from you is so full of baseless rhetoric as to be completely unhinged from reality. You are way too far down the rabbit hole of misinformation to waste any more time with. It's no surprise then that you celebrate a loon like Allan West. Goodbye.
  • JT For ... Grandbr... 2012/06/18 19:07:54
    JT For Political Reform
    LMAO
  • Israel JT For ... 2012/06/18 22:56:45
    Israel
    +1
    Very well said.
  • mwg0735 Contard... 2012/06/11 17:45:23
  • Contard... mwg0735 2012/06/11 18:31:40
    Contarded Chickenhawk Con Slayer
    +4
    LMAO... and opinions are like arseholes... Everyone has one!
  • Israel mwg0735 2012/06/12 08:12:07
    Israel
    Ignore craptard. He shouts, but is so hard to understand.
  • beachbum 2012/06/11 15:43:58
    YES
    beachbum
    +8
    Oh, yeah. This guy is a real leader...........unlike the current WH resident who said he 'leads from behind'.
  • Israel beachbum 2012/06/11 18:01:08
    Israel
    +1
    Any muslims behind from the pictures I have seen.
  • RED DAWN beachbum 2012/06/11 18:13:54
    RED DAWN
    +3
    He don't lead from behind he kisses them.
  • bman~AVA RED DAWN 2012/06/11 18:30:40
    bman~AVA
    +2
    That too.
  • beachbum RED DAWN 2012/06/11 20:14:27
    beachbum
    +1
    I think you have a good point there.
  • Israel RED DAWN 2012/06/12 08:12:34
    Israel
    +1
    Good point!!!! :))
  • Theresa 2012/06/11 15:37:00
    YES
    Theresa
    +14
    He would be an excellent President. He understands what it is to be an American.
  • FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX 2012/06/11 15:28:06 (edited)
    NO
    FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX
    +23
    This is just too funny to even consider. Especially since you don't know the difference between Allen West and Herman Cain.

    laughing gif
  • Stryder FAWKES'... 2012/06/11 15:57:54
    Stryder
    +6
    What's even more funny is that he posts Herman's pic on almost every poll of his that I've seen. So you're quite mistaken in your comment.
  • BlueRep... FAWKES'... 2012/06/11 16:10:06 (edited)
    BlueRepublican
    +9
    Fawke, as Stryder said above, I post Herman Cain on all of my blogs because Tax reform is a very important issue to me and I want to keep it from becoming overshadowed. Herman Cain's unsuccessful Presidential attempt brought back the tax reform issue to the national spotlight.
    -BR
  • FAWKES'... BlueRep... 2012/06/11 16:27:17
    FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX
    +8
    Income tax was first instituted in the United States as a flat tax. It didn't work. As far as West is concerned, he has to District-Hop in order to keep his Congressional Seat. He has yet to attempt a run in the District he actually lives in because he knows he can't beat Debbie Wasseman-Schultz.
  • BlueRep... FAWKES'... 2012/06/11 16:36:06
    BlueRepublican
    +5
    I am for lowering taxes on everyone and eliminating as many taxes as possible. People with more money = Better Economy :-)
  • Icono1 BlueRep... 2012/06/11 16:47:37
    Icono1
    +5
    Lowering taxes and other financial liabilities coming from our socialist govt would put entrepreneurs back in the game. Which would create jobs for more people. Which makes for a happy voting population

    Interesting enough is the simple fact that more jobs equals more income for the govt which equals more money to run their socialist programs. Even the old Marxists contesting Leninist reforms understood this simple rubric.

    So what is wrong with this current government? After approx 3.5 years they can't blame the stagnating economy bordering on a double dip recession on Bush and the evil Republicans.
  • FAWKES'... BlueRep... 2012/06/11 16:58:25 (edited)
    FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX
    +8
    That is not true. Lets look at some history of Taxes vs the Misery Index.

    Reagan was able to lower the US Misery Index steadily to his record term low of 8.91 with a Top Marginal Tax Rate of 50% (That's 10.5% HIGHER than what Obama wants, btw.)

    Then, in 1987, he lowered the TMTR to 38.5% and the Misery index went UP to 9.84.

    In 1988 he lowered the TMTR to 28% and the Misery Index went UP again to 10.9 and then 11.1 by 1990

    GHW Bush raised the TMTR to 31% and the Misery Index began decreasing again, slightly.. from 11.1 to 10.52.

    Then Clinton comes along and raises the TMTR to 39.6% and the Misery Index drops from 10.56 to 7.29

    What does that tell you, Copernicus?

    The answer is simple. Consumer spending grows the economy. Higher taxes force spending at both the individual and corporate level as taxpayers seek write-offs. If you've ever filed anything other than a 1040EZ you'd know that. For Corporations, their best write-offs include increasing production, adding locations, new product development and HIRING EMPLOYEES. Using the links provided below you can make your own chart. The Misery Index is low when the TMTR is high. It comes out the same every time. If you want the "Job Creators" to crate jobs YOU HAVE TO TAX THEM.. otherwise they just sit on their fat unthreatened profits...




    That is not true. Lets look at some history of Taxes vs the Misery Index.

    Reagan was able to lower the US Misery Index steadily to his record term low of 8.91 with a Top Marginal Tax Rate of 50% (That's 10.5% HIGHER than what Obama wants, btw.)

    Then, in 1987, he lowered the TMTR to 38.5% and the Misery index went UP to 9.84.

    In 1988 he lowered the TMTR to 28% and the Misery Index went UP again to 10.9 and then 11.1 by 1990

    GHW Bush raised the TMTR to 31% and the Misery Index began decreasing again, slightly.. from 11.1 to 10.52.

    Then Clinton comes along and raises the TMTR to 39.6% and the Misery Index drops from 10.56 to 7.29

    What does that tell you, Copernicus?

    The answer is simple. Consumer spending grows the economy. Higher taxes force spending at both the individual and corporate level as taxpayers seek write-offs. If you've ever filed anything other than a 1040EZ you'd know that. For Corporations, their best write-offs include increasing production, adding locations, new product development and HIRING EMPLOYEES. Using the links provided below you can make your own chart. The Misery Index is low when the TMTR is high. It comes out the same every time. If you want the "Job Creators" to crate jobs YOU HAVE TO TAX THEM.. otherwise they just sit on their fat unthreatened profits. This has held true for over 70 years.

    http://www.taxpolicycenter.or...
    http://www.miseryindex.us/ind...

    PS: The lowest Misery Index EVER was in 1953: Misery Index: 2.97. TMTR: 92%.
    (more)
  • IronOx FAWKES'... 2012/06/11 18:12:36
    IronOx
    +3
    I disagree, the misery index went up because of over spending in Congress, not because taxes were lowered. If Congress had not gone crazy with spending after Reagan successfully had taxes lowered we would have had a much lower misery index.
  • FAWKES'... IronOx 2012/06/11 18:51:41
    FAWKES' NOOSE ~ ΔTX
    +7
    Do you even know what the misery index is?

    Tell us.. Did Clinton overspend? Wait I'll answer that - NO. He increased the Debt only 31% in 8 years. To put that in perspective, Reagan nearly tripled it and GW Bush Doubled it. Your theory just flew away like a dry cleaning bag filled with butt gas.
  • IronOx FAWKES'... 2012/06/11 20:19:31
    IronOx
    +3
    Please look up how much the Democratic controlled Congress spent while Reagan was in office. Clinton also kept most of the tax policies that had worked in the past, and the Republicans controlled spending through most of his term as President.

    The President does not control spending, he does provide a budget. The Congress controls spending. Therefore, the economic state of the US is a reflection on both the Executive and Legislative branches of government. One branch may do exactly as needed and the other can reap havoc on that plan. Both parties are to blame for the debt we face today. Raising taxes does not make the Misery index better.
  • VICTORIA FAWKES'... 2012/06/12 01:51:39
    VICTORIA
    +2
    That is very impressive.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/06/20 01:38:28

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals