Quantcast

Without GOP, Unemployment Would be Under 6%

Samantha 2012/07/09 19:36:39
The GOP has been on an economic wrecking mission ever since the election of Barack Obama - indeed we now know that leading Republican strategists and legislators met and planned a course of economic sabotage and complete obstruction on Obama's very first day in office.

This obstruction has had a huge price - a deliberate price that the GOP is betting the American people will blame on President Obama. GOP obstruction did not prevent the passage of ARRA - the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - popularly know as "The Stimulus" bill of 2009 during the height of the economic disaster as the economy was falling off a cliff - the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that ARRA has saved up to 3 million jobs. But nearly every economic measure since then has been blocked by GOP obstruction, filibusters and brinksmanship.

What has been the result of GOP obstruction?

The result of GOP obstruction with those two things cost us 2.3 million jobs and 1.9 million jobs respectively. US employment as of May 2011 is about 155 million jobs, which means those 4.2 million jobs that the GOP has prevented account for 2.7% of the unemployment rate. But let's be fair, there is a small amount of overlap in those jobs - a small portion (about 8%) of the American Jobs Act would have gone to State and Local governments to pay for teachers, first responders and the like - although for the most part it would have just prevented further layoffs rather than resulted in new hires. It is also very likely that without the economic wrecking of GOP obstructionism the labor participation rate would be higher - so instead of a reduction of unemployment to 5.5% it would be slightly higher, but still well under 6%.

Read More: http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/10253...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • keymanjim 2012/07/10 03:30:27
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected

    Any questions?
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/10 13:13:25
    Samantha
    I commented on this suspicious graph in another discussion.
  • jackolantyrn356 2012/07/10 01:27:14
    jackolantyrn356
    What are you Smokling or is that drinking.?????
  • Samantha jackola... 2012/07/10 02:26:28
    Samantha
    You reject facts, science and reason; you're a conservative. It's so funny that conservatives begin insulting and attacking. Why? They can't deal with the factual information I posted.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:28:36
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • Morningstar 2012/07/09 19:56:35
    Morningstar
    +1
    The GOP will do anything to stop Obama from succeeding!
  • Samantha Morning... 2012/07/09 19:58:55
    Samantha
    Notice how the poster below, rather than addressing the facts presented, chose to insult me and then make a completely wrong statement by claiming that "the GOP has not controlled the senate or the house since 2007."
  • Morning... Samantha 2012/07/09 20:06:20
    Morningstar
    +1
    Sure do Sam - Aurora will not engage in a conversation either! Have you noticed that so many repubs do the same thing Aurora does - name calling, cartoons, avoiding facts, withdrawing from conversations????
  • Samantha Morning... 2012/07/09 20:10:01
    Samantha
    +1
    Yes, I've noticed. They insult. Why? It allows them to ignore facts, science and reason. We know conservatives hate all three.
  • Morning... Samantha 2012/07/09 20:25:36
    Morningstar
    +1
    Right on Sister!
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:28:50
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:28:43
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • Aurora 2012/07/09 19:47:45
    Aurora
    +2
    Are you really as stupid as you seem. Once again the GOP has not controlled the senate or the house since 2007. More propaganda from the left.
  • Samantha Aurora 2012/07/09 19:56:26
    Samantha
    Once again, you insult me. Since January 2011, the GOP has controlled the House; therefore, your comment "the GOP has not controlled the senate or the house since 2007" is plainly wrong. If you're incapable of posting something without insulting me, then there's no chance of discussion. You insult my intelligence then make a statement that is completely refuted by facts. However, conservatives hate facts, science and reason.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 20:03:21
    keymanjim
    The House AND ONLY THE HOUSE. And they have sent dozens of jobs bills over to the Senate of which reid has refused to put any to a vote.

    And you call the republicans obstructionists?
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/09 20:04:30
    Samantha
    +1
    Conservatives hate facts, science and reason. Too bad!
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 20:07:35
    keymanjim
    Here's a fact for you. If it weren't for the democrat's minimum wage hikes, unemployment would have stayed below 5% and the housing bubble probably wouldn't have burst.

    Great job guys, /s/
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/09 20:10:44 (edited)
    Samantha
    +1
    Oh please, all the right wing lies about the minimum wage have been proven wrong.

    http://www.cepr.net/index.php...
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 20:12:58
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/09 20:14:09 (edited)
    Samantha
    +1
    Oh, please, Fox doesn't even cite the source of the graph. Therefore, you didn't post a fact; you posted Fox propaganda. Of course, keeping the minimum wage low is just another tool in the conservative toolkit to oppress workers.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 20:16:48
    keymanjim
    Do you deny the rise in unemployment?
    Do you deny the rise in minimum wage?

    Then you can't dent the correlation between the two.
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/09 20:19:22
    Samantha
    +1
    Why isn't a source for the graph cited? Did Fox make it up? I wouldn't be surprised. Your problem lies with this: I presented factual data; you presented a made up Fox graph. Of course, conservatives reject facts, science and reason.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 20:27:11
    keymanjim
    Who's refusing to believe facts now?

    Prove the chart wrong, if you can.
  • Morning... keymanjim 2012/07/09 20:37:19
    Morningstar
    Answer Sam's question Key - where did fox get their facts?? information must be varifiable!
  • keymanjim Morning... 2012/07/09 20:38:28
    keymanjim
    Fox didn't make the chart.
    If her only problem is the source of the chart and not the chart itself then she has no argument.
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/09 22:53:19
    Samantha
    If Fox didn't make it, then why didn't they cite a source? You can't seem to answer that question.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 23:56:11
    keymanjim
    You can look up the numbers yourself.
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/10 02:27:28
    Samantha
    In other words, I was right. The 'graph' is a Fox-generated lie because, for one, it's not sourced. I posted facts; you relied upon a Fox-generated fraud.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:27:33
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:29:33
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/09 22:52:55
    Samantha
    The chart has no source; it's apparently a Fox creation and cannot be classified as fact. No one can prove a negative.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/09 23:57:25
    keymanjim
    Again, you can look up the numbers for yourself.
    Chances are that you wouldn't believe any source that is given to you anyway.
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/10 02:27:47
    Samantha
    In other words, you can't provide a source because the 'graph' is Fox-generated scam.
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:27:46
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:29:43
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/10 13:14:43
    Samantha
    The graph is suspicious because it's labeled in a very partisan way. I posted the real data in another discussion. Seriously, what right wing extremist manipulated the graph?
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:29:27
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected
  • Samantha keymanjim 2012/07/10 13:15:29
    Samantha
    Oh, that's nice, you made notes; in other words, you weren't comfortable with chart data so you had to manipulate late. Therefore, it's a another right wing scam.
  • Morning... Samantha 2012/07/09 20:35:53
    Morningstar
    +1
    Thank you Sam for your voice of reason!
  • keymanjim Samantha 2012/07/10 03:29:20
    keymanjim
    Here's one from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    I made some notes on it so you can see what effected what and when.

    bureau labor statistics notes effected

News & Politics

2013/05/20 03:30:14

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals