Hopefully when people get older they start realizing that we will always have poor and the government needs policies that help those that want to help themselves and to stop enabling people to be lazy!
I'm a left handed liberal,and I've always had a heart.Now that I'm over thirty,I'll never lose my mind and be a Repubic clan's man!But I'll always educate my brain to refrain from any misinformation of the malfeasance malfunctions! LOL
Being liberal is the easist gutless choice you will ever make in life. You'r never responsible for your actions. There is always some unseen invisible force holding you back.
The problem is that the young are not thinking of the consequenes of voting for Obama. They did it in 2008 but I highly recomend that this time they think with their heart and mind. What he is doing to America will impact the young for many many years to come. The deficit will never be paid off in mine or their lifetime. He no longer is a rock star or a shining light. His power is diminishing.
Churchhill was talking about the liberals and conservatives of his era. Unfortunately, the political spectrum has moved so far right that the current "liberals" are objectively conservative, while the current "conservatives" are either psychotic or corporatists.
The updated version of this should be: Anybody who is Republican has no brain; anyone who is a Democrat has no spine.
Actually I believe both sides have become more polarized. The Republicans have gone too far right, and the Democrats have gone too far left. That is my opinion based on my observations, however.
Objectively speaking, the Democrats are a center-right party, and haven't gone left. If you look at the current Democrats in the sense of policy, you will see that they promote policies that are virtually identical to the Republicans of the 1980s and early 1990s (ex. the ACA is essentially the same program as the healthcare program that was suggested by the Republicans as an alternative to "Hillarycare").
The only reason that many people see the Democrats as leftist is that the Republicans have shifted the debate so far right as to eliminate any truly left wing policy from consideration.
If you still think that the Democrats have tacked too far left, please send me the policies which you think justify this assertion.
Well it depends on what you consider to be right and what you consider to be left. Even if Republicans of the past believed something that Democrats do now, it doesn't mean that that was a conservative policy.
I believe Keynesian economics and legislating equality is considered left, and equal opportunity and supply side economics are considered right. Whether you agree with these policies or not, I think that's generally what leftists and rightists believe.
How much you believe in these policies determines how far on the scale you are, much like how internet political polls work. Usually it judges on how you believe the government should regulate the economy, including morally and economically. On most websites I've visited, regulating morality and limiting government economically is conservative; while moral freedom and more economic regulation is generally more liberal. I think you get what I'm trying to say.
Obama is really spreading the wealth around. The so called poor (not all) get housing, food, medical, cell phones i-pads etc etc. The rest of us that work have to pay for theirs and ours if we can afford them the second time around.
I don't think Churchill had 21st century American politics in mind, considering how much politics have changed in 80 years and how different US and UK politics are...
But what do you suppose Churchill's definition of "conservative" was?
Was Churchill's conservative someone who sought to preserve the status quo or someone who want to create "conservative change"?
Was Churchhill's conservative someone who sought to balance the budget by maintaining revenues and cutting spending or someone who advocated cutting taxes?
Was Churchill's conservative someone who believed in following precedent when deciding court cases or someone who sought to overturn precedent?
Was Chuchill's conservative someone who followed their science and economics teachers and professors or someone who sought guidance from their preacher on these topics?
A word like conservative is relative. To Churchill, FDR was a conservative. ... that is very different from those who wrap themselves in the cloak of conservative today.
Trying to build a case for your repeated claim that you, an apparent Obama-supporter, are a conservative supporting Obama because you believe him to be a conservative as well?
And furthermore, you want to give the impression that Churchill would have considered Obama a conservative based on your belief that Churchill surely recognized FDR as a conservative?
OK...Whatever you say, Mr. Ken, the self-touted, lifelong, conservative, Republican Obama-supporter (but NOT Democrats you specify)
After all, Obama DOES (or DID) have a bust of Churchill in his office I do believe.
Still, I am curious as to WHOM belongs to this quote -
"“far from depriving ordinary people of their earnings, [the millionaire] launches enterprise and carries it through, raises values, and he expands that credit without which on a vast scale no fuller economic life can be opened to the millions."
And maybe even this quote -
“...when one sees an attempt made within the space of a few months to lift American trade unionism by great heaves and bounds, one worries that result could be “a general crippling of that enterprise and flexibility upon which not only the wealth, but the happiness of modern communities depends.”
Oh YEAH...Churchill would be an Obama man right down the line (wink, ...
Oh boy...Here you go again...lol
Trying to build a case for your repeated claim that you, an apparent Obama-supporter, are a conservative supporting Obama because you believe him to be a conservative as well?
And furthermore, you want to give the impression that Churchill would have considered Obama a conservative based on your belief that Churchill surely recognized FDR as a conservative?
OK...Whatever you say, Mr. Ken, the self-touted, lifelong, conservative, Republican Obama-supporter (but NOT Democrats you specify)
After all, Obama DOES (or DID) have a bust of Churchill in his office I do believe.
Still, I am curious as to WHOM belongs to this quote -
"“far from depriving ordinary people of their earnings, [the millionaire] launches enterprise and carries it through, raises values, and he expands that credit without which on a vast scale no fuller economic life can be opened to the millions."
And maybe even this quote -
“...when one sees an attempt made within the space of a few months to lift American trade unionism by great heaves and bounds, one worries that result could be “a general crippling of that enterprise and flexibility upon which not only the wealth, but the happiness of modern communities depends.”
Oh YEAH...Churchill would be an Obama man right down the line (wink, wink) Why do you want to deceive Mr. Ken, instead of just openly supporting that which is NOT considered conservative in this day and age of America, much less the day and age of Churchill?
Words mean something to me. I can't live with the doublespeak of today's Republicans. .... people like you who get their science and economics from preachers, drug addicts, and recovering alcoholics.
Sharing photoshoped pictures is all well and good....but your man Bush used cocaine. But that isn't the addict I was referring to...because while Bush and Obama used recreational substances in their youth, they never were addicts.
Sure Obama is an addict..Of what?...Who specifically and fully knows?
But, his apparent and publicly known addiction to nicotine is proof enough of his addictive weakness.
I couldn't care less what you call Bush...He himself has admitted his recognition of his own past indulgence in alcohol to the point of his own wife seeing it as a detriment to him, her, and their marriage.
Regardless, what you do with Bush or think of Bush is OK with me.
As far as addicts go, you might want to be concerned about your addiction to Barack Obama...lol
But, that is your business...It's only my business to try and rebut your goofy claims of Obama's "conservatism", and your own phony "conservatism".
Especially when you try and imply that Churchill would think of FDR and Obama as "conservatives", much less conservatives in the U.S.A.
Okay! But I don't know you to have an opinion about you, except maybe you like to howl from looking at your picture...Do you have any addictions? Mine is to Ben & Jerry's Fro-Yo. LOL
Under "normal" circumstances only the liberal progressive isms of youth can attract the young to military service and be willing to risk their lives for causes perceived to be greater than themselves. With age and maturity they learn they were used and have progressed up to join the manipulators.
Age had nothing to do with anything here. I knew a woman who was 101 yrs. old and was up to date and very smart on political matters and other things. Smart as a whip and just as witty and full of smarts. Who cares if your 21, 35, 40, 60, 79, 103 as long as your brain is still working , It makes you wiser. Good quote but doesn't matter.
The updated version of this should be: Anybody who is Republican has no brain; anyone who is a Democrat has no spine.
www.SarcasticLiberal.blogspot...
The only reason that many people see the Democrats as leftist is that the Republicans have shifted the debate so far right as to eliminate any truly left wing policy from consideration.
If you still think that the Democrats have tacked too far left, please send me the policies which you think justify this assertion.
I believe Keynesian economics and legislating equality is considered left, and equal opportunity and supply side economics are considered right. Whether you agree with these policies or not, I think that's generally what leftists and rightists believe.
How much you believe in these policies determines how far on the scale you are, much like how internet political polls work. Usually it judges on how you believe the government should regulate the economy, including morally and economically. On most websites I've visited, regulating morality and limiting government economically is conservative; while moral freedom and more economic regulation is generally more liberal. I think you get what I'm trying to say.
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law."
Hasn't the Obama admin created much more than that?
And today's Conservatives are more inline with the Nazi's..
LMAO
Was Churchill's conservative someone who sought to preserve the status quo or someone who want to create "conservative change"?
Was Churchhill's conservative someone who sought to balance the budget by maintaining revenues and cutting spending or someone who advocated cutting taxes?
Was Churchill's conservative someone who believed in following precedent when deciding court cases or someone who sought to overturn precedent?
Was Chuchill's conservative someone who followed their science and economics teachers and professors or someone who sought guidance from their preacher on these topics?
A word like conservative is relative. To Churchill, FDR was a conservative. ... that is very different from those who wrap themselves in the cloak of conservative today.
Trying to build a case for your repeated claim that you, an apparent Obama-supporter, are a conservative supporting Obama because you believe him to be a conservative as well?
And furthermore, you want to give the impression that Churchill would have considered Obama a conservative based on your belief that Churchill surely recognized FDR as a conservative?
OK...Whatever you say, Mr. Ken, the self-touted, lifelong, conservative, Republican Obama-supporter (but NOT Democrats you specify)
After all, Obama DOES (or DID) have a bust of Churchill in his office I do believe.
Still, I am curious as to WHOM belongs to this quote -
"“far from depriving ordinary people of their earnings, [the millionaire] launches enterprise and carries it through, raises values, and he expands that credit without which on a vast scale no fuller economic life can be opened to the millions."
And maybe even this quote -
“...when one sees an attempt made within the space of a few months to lift American trade unionism by great heaves and bounds, one worries that result could be “a general crippling of that enterprise and flexibility upon which not only the wealth, but the happiness of modern communities depends.”
Oh YEAH...Churchill would be an Obama man right down the line (wink, ...
Trying to build a case for your repeated claim that you, an apparent Obama-supporter, are a conservative supporting Obama because you believe him to be a conservative as well?
And furthermore, you want to give the impression that Churchill would have considered Obama a conservative based on your belief that Churchill surely recognized FDR as a conservative?
OK...Whatever you say, Mr. Ken, the self-touted, lifelong, conservative, Republican Obama-supporter (but NOT Democrats you specify)
After all, Obama DOES (or DID) have a bust of Churchill in his office I do believe.
Still, I am curious as to WHOM belongs to this quote -
"“far from depriving ordinary people of their earnings, [the millionaire] launches enterprise and carries it through, raises values, and he expands that credit without which on a vast scale no fuller economic life can be opened to the millions."
And maybe even this quote -
“...when one sees an attempt made within the space of a few months to lift American trade unionism by great heaves and bounds, one worries that result could be “a general crippling of that enterprise and flexibility upon which not only the wealth, but the happiness of modern communities depends.”
Oh YEAH...Churchill would be an Obama man right down the line (wink, wink)
Why do you want to deceive Mr. Ken, instead of just openly supporting that which is NOT considered conservative in this day and age of America, much less the day and age of Churchill?
Oooookay....And you get your politics from this one?..lol
Wow...Great improvement (wink, wink)
But, his apparent and publicly known addiction to nicotine is proof enough of his addictive weakness.
I couldn't care less what you call Bush...He himself has admitted his recognition of his own past indulgence in alcohol to the point of his own wife seeing it as a detriment to him, her, and their marriage.
Regardless, what you do with Bush or think of Bush is OK with me.
As far as addicts go, you might want to be concerned about your addiction to Barack Obama...lol
But, that is your business...It's only my business to try and rebut your goofy claims of Obama's "conservatism", and your own phony "conservatism".
Especially when you try and imply that Churchill would think of FDR and Obama as "conservatives", much less conservatives in the U.S.A.
Ken, you need help my very weird friend.
Have fun with it.