Will You Vote For Ron Paul When He's The Nominee..?

by Josh Robinson Posted 2012/07/10 14:36:47

Related Topics: Obama, Ron Paul, War, Candidate, Peace, Im, Economic, Vote

Read More

58 votes
Read all 193 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	I'll pick War and Overreaching Govt like i'm TOLD to...	11 votes	19%
	I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...	47 votes	81%

Or will you still be all War Horny and vote for Obama..?

+13

Add a comment above

DizziNY 2012/07/10 15:29:25 (edited)

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+8
I am voting Dr. Paul regardless of who the RNC tries to shove down our throats.

>> See Replies

More polls by Josh Robinson

beach bum 2012/07/13 11:35:05

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+2
yes

reply
Sister Jean 2012/07/12 15:55:47

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+2
yes

reply
Striker 2012/07/12 15:50:39

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+3
First Paul must get nominated. Otherwise we all move to Libertarian Gary Johnson and take the RINO Party down and out. Maybe then somehow America will have a chance. Trouble is that it's so far gone that it'll take much more than a new president.

reply
Dagon 2012/07/12 15:36:55
Josh Ro... to Dagon 2012/07/12 16:11:09 (edited)

+2
Please... I Implore you to look into the Paul campaign again. The principal is ANYTHING but losing...!

reply
Dagon to Josh Ro... 2012/07/12 16:27:14
Josh Ro... to Dagon 2012/07/12 16:39:10

+2
He is the Only obvious choice... the others are like picking from fastfood. You know it's bad and it kills you but it's right there in your face at every turn...!

reply
Dagon to Josh Ro... 2012/07/12 16:39:45
Dan ☮ R... to Dagon 2012/07/13 03:31:21

+2
There are just two problems I have with that approach.
First, Republican overlords dont seem to be much better than democrat overlords.
Second, I dont see the point in preserving the nation if we forfeit our principles, because that's what defined our nation. Without them it is honestly hard to call this place America.

I wont try to change your opinion, but that's simply where I'm coming from.

reply
Dagon to Dan ☮ R... 2012/07/13 03:44:23
ParkMan 2012/07/11 03:34:49 (edited)

I'll pick War and Overreaching Govt like i'm TOLD to...

+3
Though this is an easy question as Ron Paul will never be the candidate.

reply
Josh Ro... to ParkMan 2012/07/11 03:48:24

+1
He was also never going to be where he is... Obama and Romney are spending Millions of dollars a month trying to beat Paul who isn't even trying anymore...lol.... Ron Paul quit campaign spending when he ran out of money (radical notion I know) and is still beating Romney and Obama no matter how much grass they feed the sheep.

reply
Ken 2012/07/11 03:21:36

I'll pick War and Overreaching Govt like i'm TOLD to...

+3
I'll pick Romney or any other candidate than Obama.

reply
ScatterJoy! 2012/07/10 22:47:45 (edited)

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+3
HOLY BURNING BUTT BALLS OF FIRE BATMAN!

Yes Please - bring back the one guy in politics who tells the truth.

reply
Michael=Constitution & Liberty 2012/07/10 22:05:11

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+4
you're dayum skippy I will :) no compromise ;)

reply
Striker to Michael... 2012/07/12 16:08:56

+2
or
http://www.garyjohnson2012.co...

reply
Cal 2012/07/10 20:16:35 (edited)

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+3

reply
Josh Ro... to Cal 2012/07/10 21:48:20

+2
Where do I know that guy from.... Oh yea he collapsed our town... He's running for president now..?

reply
Cal to Josh Ro... 2012/07/10 23:23:31

+3
Yeah against the guy who collapsed our nation. Funny enough...he's running too I think....

reply
Pm 2012/07/10 19:46:47
Josh Ro... to Pm 2012/07/10 21:51:56

+1
He was out of money... He didn't decline debates he stopped touring when his money ran out instead of begging for more money/wedding gifts/presents or taking bank money. Gingrich quit over 3 million in debt. I love how Ron Paul stopped campaigning and is still a major threat to Romney and Obama who continue to spend MILLIONS a month spinning their wheels in the mud.

reply
Pm to Josh Ro... 2012/07/11 18:26:53

+2
Gingrich wanted to save this nation form libs like Romney getting the nomination. However, the libs did a good job of smearing Gingrich and keeping the focus off the facts.
Ron Paul has not a single chance and isnt a threat....Come on man

reply
Josh Ro... to Pm 2012/07/11 18:46:17

+1
Newt Gingrich bankrupted his campaign covering up his past and had no real time to debate issues with all the damage control and fund hustling going on. Come on man... Newt Gingrich... I spit my cheerios when I heard he had the audacity to even run for potus. Did he forget he IS Newt Gingrich..? We didn't...!

reply
Pm to Josh Ro... 2012/07/14 18:52:18

ya the only true leader running. He controlled Clinton. Stopped the lib bills and united the R party. He also made 100s of compromised and worked with the democratic party. Basically all the traits we are in need of for a leader (President). The country needs to unite, no more division.

reply
gregaj7 2012/07/10 19:21:00

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+5
Ron Paul is the only candidate worth supporting. The ABO method cannot and will not work. As the phrase states, "New Boss same as the old Boss".

reply
Turings... to gregaj7 2012/07/10 19:47:33

+3
Indeed. 'Anyone but Bush' got us Obama. :p

reply
Striker to gregaj7 2012/07/12 16:07:56

+1
It is Romney who cannot win!

reply
gregaj7 to Striker 2012/07/12 20:48:17

+2
Which is why Ron Paul should be the GOP nominee.

reply
Striker to gregaj7 2012/07/13 01:54:46

+1
agree, but not being a republican, I have nothing to say about how that goes!

reply
Tuna 2012/07/10 19:13:19 (edited)

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+7
Those Perry, Bachmann, Pawlenty, Gingrich, Cain delegates do NOTautomatically go to Romney; they have their own voice and their own vote at the convention. We can not elect ANOTHER establishment candidate and sure as hell not Obama.

reply
*K'eim*h3reg' *Peh2u *Meg' 2012/07/10 18:21:58

I'll pick the economic wizard and peace candidate like im SUPPOSED to...

+4
I don't care if he is or not. Short of him endorsing Johnson, I am voting for Paul.

reply
Striker to *K'eim*... 2012/07/12 16:04:42

Well have Paul, or we'll have Johnson. Either is about all that's left for if we hope to see America continue.

reply
mich52 2012/07/10 18:06:43

I'll pick War and Overreaching Govt like i'm TOLD to...

+3
Paul will never get the nomination, when did he become an economic wizard?
That's pretty funny..

reply
Josh Ro... to mich52 2012/07/10 18:11:33 (edited)

+3
And Romney will never get the people so.... We Win..? Who wins..? Does anyone win..?

reply
mich52 to Josh Ro... 2012/07/10 20:14:16

+2
It seems that the GOP has pretty much picked Romney, that's the GOP's problem.

reply
Josh Ro... to mich52 2012/07/10 21:54:43

+1
They don't have a choice.... half of them will go to jail for voter fraud if Paul is elected... nobody goes to jail if Romney is elected.

reply
Tuna to mich52 2012/07/10 19:17:07

+4
He warned repeatedly of the consequences of an unchecked Fannie and Freddie; this whole nasty meltdown could have been avoided.

reply
mich52 to Tuna 2012/07/10 20:12:46

+2
Fannie and Freddie were only a small part, deregulation played a bigger part and if I recall he opposed that too.. Neither makes him an economic wizard..

reply
Tuna to mich52 2012/07/10 21:28:18 (edited)

+2
The only deregulation was when Clinton repealled the Glass-Steagall Act to facilitate the CRA/CRI that brought down the housing market and our econonmy with it; then bundle up the bad mortgages and sell them to our friends causing them to meltdown, too. I'd give him a much higher mark than the wizard we have in there now or the three before him. Bush 41, Clinton, and Bush 43 were fiscal socialists.

reply
mich52 to Tuna 2012/07/10 22:36:34 (edited)

+2
Their were two pieces of deregulation, in 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley and in 2000 the Commodities Modernization Futures Act. Funny you claim Clinton did it for the CRA/CRI reason when Republicans wrote both bills....

reply