Will You Pledge to Only Vote for ProLife Candidates?

this is third rail politics

No because i'm pro-choice. But i will not pledge to a candidate just because they are pro-choice. Now if a candidate was pro-choice and pro-death penalty then i might get behind that.

I wish you would have a choice of just plain "NO".

One issue voters are a detriment to our whole political process. Especially since I would say a boatload of candidates could give a fig less anyway. Of course you have hysterical pro-lifers like Palin, Santorum, Issa, etc, but I wouldn't vote for any of them if you held a gun to my head....which by the way is another one issue vote. The NRA supporters.

When there are so many other really important issues that affects all of us, and a voter goes to the poll for just one reason, its the most ridiculous thing there is.

First off, thanks for intelligently adding options that people can choose from. How refreshing....others take note.

I will always look for candidates who are pro-life, and it will always be a very central focal point for me as part of that candidates portfolio.

That's important to me
.Have a nice day !

Pro lifers want to take away a persons choice!!!! Next it will be another choice. If someone doesnt like it, they want to stop you... BS it is no ones business what someone does as long as it is legal according to the society they live in....

So it would be ok for a parent to kill a two year old as long as it is legal to do so?

That is a person

But a preborn child isn't a person?

It is not a child.

What do you think she is? A dog? A Cat? A Frog? Of course not! Humans reproduce after their own kind. Don't be ignorant!

WTF, who said I thought it was not human? I just realize that it is not a person. My poo is human, but it does not make it a person.

So you're comparing a preborn child to feces?

No, I am comparing a non-person to a non-person.

Here are the only differences between an unborn baby, and any one of us: Size, Level of development, dependency, and location.

Is a short man less of a person, and a tall man more of a person because of their size? No

Is a 2 year old, who is not fully developed (ie. They cannot reproduce), less of a person because of that? Of course not

Is an old lady in a nursing home who is dependent on medicine everyday less of a person? Or a diabetic who its dependent on insulin?

Is a person ever less of a person because they're in a different location? Can I go somewhere else to become more of a person? No.

Think logically, there is no magical event that suddenly turns us into persons. We need to protect every life and protect the women from making a wrong and painful decision. We want to protect women too!

But they are all people.

That's my point! There is nothing special about an unborn child that makes the not a person!

The only differences between an unborn child and me or you are the *insignificant* things listed above

No, the other things you named are people. You are assuming that fetuses are unborn babies.

Law of Biogenises: Living things only reproduce after their own kind. Humans can only give birth to humans. therefor, fetuses are unborn babies.
Its a scientific Law.

One thing cannot be something, then magically change into something else

Did I say that it was not human? I only said it wasn't a person.

Do you think seeds are trees and eggs are chickens?

Okay. Then what makes a person a person? Why are unborn children not persons?

They are not children. Why is it that hard to understand?

Why aren't they children?? I strongly believe that they are children, and I have given scientific reason for my stance. Where is your proof or reason?

What you believe is not relevant. You gave no proof for anything, you just repeated the same anti-abortion arguments that have disproved over and over.

Then show me the argument that disproves what I said. You stated your beliefs with no backing, so I stated my beliefs but I gave a reason.

You gave no proof, what I say is backed by science and doctors.

What is backed by science? Show me the proof

can a zygote think? nope. and it's your job to proof it's a person.

Did you sleep through 8th grade biology?

You are christian and conservative, I wouldn't be talking.

This is my argument, tell me how this is wrong:

"Here are the only differences between an unborn baby, and any one of us: Size, Level of development, dependency, and location.

Is a short man less of a person, and a tall man more of a person because of their size? No

Is a 2 year old, who is not fully developed (ie. They cannot reproduce), less of a person because of that? Of course not

Is an old lady in a nursing home who is dependent on medicine everyday less of a person? Or a diabetic who its dependent on insulin?

Is a person ever less of a person because they're in a different location? Can I go somewhere else to become more of a person? No.

Think logically, there is no magical event that suddenly turns us into persons. We need to protect every life and protect the women from making a wrong and painful decision. We want to protect women too!"

I short man and tall man are still people.

2 year olds are people.

The old woman is a person.

THEY ARE ALL PEOPLE.

Start using your brain.

I didn't sleep through 8th grade biology. I learned that human life begins at conception. I recommend a refresher course.

Where did you learn that, a christian school?

All you do is say "They aren't people." I am using my brain, and I logically showed that there is no significant difference. You need to give an argument to your side. Just saying that they aren't people doesn't mean anything

You showed nothing, you just said what you feel.

Basic biology is taught in both public and private schools.

Obviously not.

So you aren't going to give an argument?

Basic biology may not have been taught in the school you went to, but it was in mine. You may want to take a refresher course.