Will Voting For Ron Paul Help or Hurt Obama's Chances of Re-election?
|
|
|||||
|
14 votes
|
|
23% | |||
|
41 votes
|
|
67% | |||
|
6 votes
|
|
10% | |||
With Paul in the race, Romney would win with 44 percent of the vote, followed by Obama with 39 percent and Paul with 13 percent, if the election were this week, according to the May 6-7 poll of 1,000 likely voters. The margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points.
Rasmussen Reports' most recent daily tracking poll of the presidential race has Romney at 49 percent and Obama at 44 percent in a two person race.
A Paul candidacy would hurt Obama most among independents, the poll suggests. Paul would only gain the votes of five percent of Democrats, but would win 23 percent of independents. Only 31 percent of the remaining independents would go to Obama and Romney would win 37 percent of the independent vote.
*********
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul's son, endorsed Mitt Romney for president late Thursday night, just a day after his father admitted that he could not be the GOP nominee given his delegate count.
"My first choice has always been my father. I campaigned for him when I was 11-years-old. He's still my first pick," Paul, a founding member of the Senate Tea Party Caucus, told Fox News' Sean Hannity. "But now that the nominating process is over, tonight I'm happy to announce that I'm going to be supporting Gov. Mitt Romney."
Read More: http://www.christianpost.com/news/ron-paul-would-t...
Top Opinion
-
DM Twin 2012/06/12 17:03:47A Ron Paul vote will help re-elect Obama+7Ok Paulinistas..
VOTE FOR THE ACTUAL REPUBLICAN OR STAY HOME..
Write in Ron Paul and YOU ARE VOTING FOR OBUTTHOLE...
If youWANT Obama to win re-electrion do as you will... that just makes you a commicrat so QUIT LYING about being a Libertarian . If you were a Libertarian... YOU WOULD VOTE FOR THE LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE.... Don't be a Hypocrtie .






















I vote for the best person on the ballot.
And we also need to get a law passed that if any person is involved in, or their Campaign group is involved in ANY fraud at the polls, they are automatically DISQUAILFIED!!!
Some state that they will not vote for the lesser of two evils. Well guess what folks, this is politics. The choice, at least for the last forty or fifty years, has always been between the lesser of two evils. Didn't used to be that way. Believe it or not there was a time when some politicians had a little integrity. Sadly, no longer the case.
I am not a fan of Romney, but if he is the nominee, and it seems very likely that he will be, I will vote for him.
Stands to reason mathematically that a vote for anyone else is a vote for oblunder soooooooo, if you want another four years of wannabe dictator oblunder then stay home or vote for someone else.
That's like saying I turned on Obama because I didn't vote for Obama.
Gary Johnson, a "successful" 2-term governor, who cut spending while adhering to founding principles in his state of NM. He cut big government and balanced the budget and stands up to the status quo.
I won't vote the lesser of two evils ... who destroyed Rome more Caligula or Nero? It doesn't matter they both did it in their own way. The problem with voting the lesser of two evils is you know you are voting for a two-headed snake who will reveal himself for what he is in time.
In my opinion your fear of Obama clouds your ability to think clearly.
VOTE FOR THE ACTUAL REPUBLICAN OR STAY HOME..
Write in Ron Paul and YOU ARE VOTING FOR OBUTTHOLE...
If youWANT Obama to win re-electrion do as you will... that just makes you a commicrat so QUIT LYING about being a Libertarian . If you were a Libertarian... YOU WOULD VOTE FOR THE LIBERTARIAN CANDIDATE.... Don't be a Hypocrtie .
"Berry" does not want liberty, he wants to be a dictator. Unfortunately for him, the Constitution let him, so he going to settle as a socialist.