Will The Obama Regime Rescue Dr. Shakil Afridi?

by Apache Posted 2012/06/03 18:02:21

Related Topics: Osama Bin Laden, Osama, Obama, Bin Laden, CIA, Family, Hunt, Links, United States, jail, Media, Doctor, Pakistan, America

Read More

Read all 12 opinions

A Pakistani doctor who helped the United States find Osama bin Laden
was imprisoned for aiding militants and not for links to the CIA, as
Pakistani officials had said, according to a court document released on
Wednesday.

Last week, a court in the Khyber tribal region near the Afghan border
sentenced Shakil Afridi to 33 years in jail. Pakistani officials told
Western and domestic media the decision was based on treason charges for
aiding the CIA in its hunt for the al-Qaeda chief.

Is it because America can't afford the $25 million reward?

Why did the Obama Regime disclosed this top secret information?

Shouldn't Dr Afridi and his family been hastily removed out of Pakistan and to America?

Shouldn't Dr Afridi receive the $25 million and start a new life here?

Shouldn't America punish Pakistan by removing ALL FOREIGN AID to their pathetic country?

I would enjoy reading some of your comments on this story.

Wanted dead or alive Osama bin laden 25 million reward

Apache 2012/06/04 01:29:30

Obama is an amateur that only is concerned about his reelection and nothing else.

reply
sick'n'tired 2012/06/03 19:56:30

+1
No. Bush doesn't have it set up for him.

reply
Schläue~© 2012/06/03 18:46:31

+1
Not a snow-ball's chance in Hell.
The good doctor knows too many details that would take away the limelight from from the BS rendition of how "I got bin Laden".

I could see some serious chit going down if Pakistan doesn't agree to release him and allow safe passage for his family on inauguration day, 2013. (Déjà vu)

That is of course, if 0bozo doesn't have him offed between now & then.

reply
Apache to Schläue~© 2012/06/04 01:33:43

+1
Remember Reagan and the Iran Hostage Crises? The Ayatollah crapped his pants when he saw Reagan win over Jimmy Peanut. The American Hostages were immediately released. That's how it will be after Romney takes over in January.

reply
Schläue~© to Apache 2012/06/04 01:55:30

+1
Yep ... but Romney is going to have to get mean. Kinda like that debate he had with Dead Ted in 1992. (well, before he was dead)
He had some fire in that debate and that's what he's going to have to bring.
Are there any theaters down your way that will be showing "2016"?
It's supposed to be released on the 8th but I cannot find any place showing it.

reply
Apache to Schläue~© 2012/06/04 14:12:01

+1
He also needs some cool "one-liners" in the debates, just like Reagan did.

reply
Schläue~© to Apache 2012/06/04 14:36:21

+1
The way things are looking, I seriously doubt Barry is going to be around for the show. His cabinet is imploding as the pressure mounts and nobody wants to get caught in the blades when it hits.

reply
Apache to Schläue~© 2012/06/04 18:24:51

+1
Remember the first debate with Reagan and Carter? Carter never showed up and they never found him.

reply
Schläue~© to Apache 2012/06/04 19:11:23

+1
Nah, I missed that one, although I was in Downtown Los Angeles (1976) the day they cordoned off the intersection of 6th & Broadway and heard him proclaim his famous line from the pulpit, "Hi, I'm Jimmah Carter, and I'm going to be your next President".

I remember thinking... you've got to be kidding me.
The results produced one of the strangest election maps ever.

reply
Kat ♪ 2012/06/03 18:17:19

+2
No, They don't care about people who help us, " throw him under the bus, we have a vacation and golf round scheduled."

reply
Matt Gray 2012/06/03 18:17:04

+2
Highly doubtful. Otherwise we would have done something by now. That doctor has been tortured and imprisoned for a good deed. If our President cared he would done something already. We're all aware how cheap talk is.

reply
Apache to Matt Gray 2012/06/04 14:13:19

Everyone will be fearful of assisting America because of Obama's actions.

reply