Will SH Conservatives Whine And Make Lame Excuses When President Obama Is Reelected ?
Che Guevara - Hero
2012/05/03 18:31:17
|
|
|||||
|
103 votes
|
|
78% | ||
|
29 votes
|
|
22% | ||
Will SH Conservatives Whine And Make Lame Excuses When President Obama Is Reelected ?
Top Opinion
-
The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk 2012/05/03 21:26:10YES, They WILL Whine And Make Lame Excuses.
+16Whining is what they are doing now, Bitching, moaning and having full on Nervous breakdowns is what they'll have after the re-election. First it will be Voter Fraud, Then it will be the Liberal Media, Then They'll try to impeach him. During all of this we will still have to hear from the birthers. and finally they will reach acceptance and realize that Romney was never "Conservative Enough" for them. By then it should be 2015 and wait for the gate to open and all the maniacs barreling out for 2016. And Chances are that who ever the 2016 nominee is will still not be "Conservative Enough" The Leader who is "Conservative Enough" for them took his own life at the end of WWII.
NOW ON TO ROSA PARKS:
First, congressional gold medals have been handed out since even before the constitution, and there's no historical record suggesting that the founding fathers deemed them to be an unconstitutional expenditure. The first one was awarded to George Washington, in 1776. Second, the medal wasn't being funded by tax dollars, it was funded through the sale of bronze replicas, which Ron Paul would have known if he had actually had actually read the bill. If Ron Paul wanted to chip in his own money rather than charging the tax payers, then he could have done so, by purchasing a replica. Is there any evidence that he actually did? I guess words speak louder than actions. Third, Ron Paul claims that the medal went against everything that Rosa Parks believed in. But Rosa Parks was still alive at the time, so why not just ask her how she felt about it? What makes Ron Paul think that he has the authority to speak on her behalf?
At the very worst, Ron Paul is a blatant racist. At the very least, Ron is too incompetent to actually read a bill before he makes a speech against it.
http://www.dailykos.com/story...
...
NOW ON TO ROSA PARKS:
First, congressional gold medals have been handed out since even before the constitution, and there's no historical record suggesting that the founding fathers deemed them to be an unconstitutional expenditure. The first one was awarded to George Washington, in 1776. Second, the medal wasn't being funded by tax dollars, it was funded through the sale of bronze replicas, which Ron Paul would have known if he had actually had actually read the bill. If Ron Paul wanted to chip in his own money rather than charging the tax payers, then he could have done so, by purchasing a replica. Is there any evidence that he actually did? I guess words speak louder than actions. Third, Ron Paul claims that the medal went against everything that Rosa Parks believed in. But Rosa Parks was still alive at the time, so why not just ask her how she felt about it? What makes Ron Paul think that he has the authority to speak on her behalf?
At the very worst, Ron Paul is a blatant racist. At the very least, Ron is too incompetent to actually read a bill before he makes a speech against it.
http://www.dailykos.com/story...
The Civil Rights Act repealed the notorious Jim Crow laws; forced schools, bathrooms and buses to desegregate; and banned employment discrimination. Although Paul was not around to weigh in on the landmark legislation at the time, he had the chance to cast a symbolic vote against it in 2004, when the House of Representatives took up a resolution "recognizing and honoring the 40th anniversary of congressional passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964." Paul was the only member who voted "no."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
Now they're all frothing because you can't find baby pictures of Obama online, and "no one" has "ever" seen them. *eye roll*. Somehow, that's supposed to mean that Obama was born in Kenya...although I have no baby pictures online either, and I was born in the US.
http://www.realclearpolitics....
verb (used with object)
1.
to scatter (seed) over land, earth, etc., for growth; plant.
2.
to plant seed for: to sow a crop.
3.
to scatter seed over (land, earth, etc.) for the purpose of growth.
4.
to implant, introduce, or promulgate; seek to propagate or extend; disseminate: to sow distrust or dissension.
5.
to strew or sprinkle with anything.
SEW verb \ˈsō\
sewedsewn or sewedsew·ing
Definition of SEW
transitive verb
1
: to unite or fasten by stitches
2
: to close or enclose by sewing
intransitive verb
: to practice or engage in sewing
Sad, but you can only help people who want to be helped.
http://www.realclearpolitics....
Coarse when looking at the alternative.(obama) He's outstanding!!!!
They don't like Mitt, but they had dumb, dumber, and dumbest to choose from, so Mitt's the 'anyone but Obama' to them. They would be so sorry, but they won't have to be since we will have President Obama for another 4 years, Thank God!