Why won't Media Matters answer questions regarding collusion with the Whitehouse?

Forget Media Matters. I want to know why the White House and this president are refusing to answer questions about Solyndra, Fast and Furious, backdoor amnesty, giving oil-rich islands to Russia, and about 10,000 other things.

The last time this president held a news conference without prescreened, pre-selected questioners was when?

NEVER

I would like ANSWERS to those questions myself . WHY is HOLDER holding 60,000 documents from the Fast and Furious investigation ?

That's why Issa started contempt proceedings.

I would like to see Holder TARRED , FEATHERED & RUN OUT OF TOWN ON A RAIL !

Because the are in collusion, same way Rachel Maddow and other MSNBCers regularly visit the WH for "meetings" with the Prez

M.S.N.B.C. is the " Propaganda Arm of the Democrat Party " .................. Maddow is just dropping in ( to get their LIES straight ) .

BFD

damn right bfd!

Unless they are ordered by a court to do so its their damn right not to..

In due time honey!

But - they're the official publicists for the "Most Transparent Administration Ever"!

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOWEEEEEEEEEEEEEE ! DAMN , That's a Good One ! LMAO

Thanx.

Deny, ignore , attack. Isn't this the pattern laid down for the left? If they don't answer, their words can't be held against them. Look at Fast and Furious. They tried to ignore that and thankfully, it isn't done yet. Brock is such a squirrel anyway.

YUP ! .............. you understand them perfectly .

Hah! you are asking why these libs get away with what they away with? The answer is simple, the same reason why a dog licks his ass, because they can.

because there is no answer that doesn't immediately leave a trail of collusion that leads directly to the White House.

ALL ROADS lead to Obie !

i hope all roads, for him, lead out of Washington in November.

Me Too !

Do you or anyone think that these people would obey the law of the land? Don't be stupid, this is THE OBAMA, the EXPECTED MESSIAH. This man is above any law created by man, because HE has finally arrived in the political scene, the long awaited one. So, all you mere mortals, just suck it up, and quit bothering the GREAT ONE

what could i possibly have been thinking?

;-)

Because the laws against 'Racketeering' would put them all in PRISON

How does what they do fit racketeering:? I am not that familiar with it.

Look at the three with asterisks in front and decide if that doesn't fit the Obama administration.


RICO offensesUnder the law, the meaning of racketeering activity is set out at 18 U.S.C. § 1961. As currently amended it includes:

Any violation of state statutes against gambling, murder, kidnapping, extortion, arson, robbery, bribery, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled substance or listed chemical (as defined in the Controlled Substances Act);
Any act of bribery, counterfeiting, theft, embezzlement, fraud, dealing in obscene matter, obstruction of justice, slavery, racketeering, gambling, money laundering, commission of murder-for-hire, and several other offenses covered under the Federal criminal code (Title 18);
****Embezzlement of union funds;
Bankruptcy fraud or securities fraud;
****Drug trafficking; long-term and elaborate drug networks can also be prosecuted using the Continuing Criminal Enterprise Statute;
Criminal copyright infringement;
Money laundering and related offenses;
****Bringing in, aiding or assisting aliens in illegally entering the country (if the action was for financial gain);
Acts of terrorism

omg it does!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thanks!!!!! I think slavery and obstruction of justice could be added to that list with asterics - Possibly so could bankruptcy ( of a nation! ) and securities fraud. I used to appreciate our government in some ways but I can't find a thing to like about them anymore.

I wouldn't talk to some guy running after me with a microphone and camera either!

This post is a joke!

LOL - Guess you still haven't received enough Oxygen yet from those red blood cells gravitating towards your nostrils...

STAUNCH.....

"Harvard University Professor Alan Dershowitz recently warned Democrats that they will lose the presidential election this year if they stick with Media Matters for America. '

so someone said something about someone else and you believe it ?

You do realize hearsay is not admissible evidence right!

Alan Dershowitz, a staunch democratic supporter thinks Media Matters is hurting obama..

lol - Has Media Matters filled out one of these lately?

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pd...

Inuendo and second hand statements and your biased opinion does not a story make!

OK - you are starting to repeat yourself - better turn over!

hmmm... last time a 5768 was filed by Media Matters was..... ????

Aren't all of her's jokes?

I haven't read many from her and probably won't bother again!

"her's" ..... Really?

hahahahahaha!!

Wow! You really are thinking upside down.

I am not upside down you are and just haven't realized it yet!