Why the GOP is winning the Medicare debate
You can crunch the numbers all day long, but in politics it’s perception that matters.
And though it’s still early, Republicans have a chance to turn the Medicare debate into a political advantage (or a wash, which is as good as a win). The conventional thinking, the media thinking, and actually, the thinking (if we’re to believe Politico) of the entire hand-wringing GOP establishment, was that Paul Ryan’s vice presidential candidacy would make Medicare an issue and surely sink the ticket. Democrats, we were told in story after story, were just giddy over the prospect of facing the Wisconsin congressman.
The debate hasn’t exactly evolved the way we were told it should. Why?
One: It’s possible that voters have already priced-in the hysterical warnings from liberals about the GOP’s intent to destroy all entitlements. They’ve heard it all a million times, yet the programs’ price tag continue to grow exponentially, and often under Republican rule. Add to that increasing numbers of Americans who believe that Medicare is unsustainable and the issue has probably lost some potency for Democrats.
Two: It’s not what you fear; it’s what you fear more. Seniors might be more anxious about Republicans expanding Medicare to include premium support , but they are more nervous about what Obamacare means to their future.
Three: When the Affordable Health Care Act passed, Obama handed Republicans a political gift.
Obamacare sucks over $700 billion from Medicare. Not that it means much, because surely few people really believe any Affordable Health Care Act cost estimates. But the president made a political calculation to keep the price tag of Obamacare under a trillion dollars to make it an easier sell to American people.
So now, if Democrats argue that the $700 billion is just a cut in future growth (the truth), they are undermining the age-old left-wing definition of government “cuts”– in fact, they are undermining their argument about how Ryan’s budget “slashes” spending (it doesn’t).
If Obama’s campaign argues that Ryan’s budget also cuts $700 billion (the truth), they offer Republicans another opening: Because not only did Obama decide to cut $700 billion from Medicare, unlike Ryan, he did so to fund a new entitlement program that, according to nearly every poll conducted since its passage, Americans really dislike – especially seniors.
So, all of a sudden Romney-Ryan can focus on Obama’s Medicare cuts, which Obama must defend, which steers the entire conversation back to Obamacare.
Romney could also mention that Obama’s Medicare cuts draw heavily from the Medicare Advantage program, which is a privately-administered health care plan that is, in spirit, similar to the premium-support programs that seniors are supposed to fear. Both Medicare Advantage enrollees and traditional Medicare enrollees oppose cutting the program under any circumstance in large numbers.
Read More: http://www.humanevents.com/2012/08/17/can-the-gop-...
Top Opinion
-
wtw 2012/08/18 18:18:32+3Obama-care is a lie and a scam--Obama said it would not add to the deficit and that is a lie. Obama said you could keep your doctor and that turns out to be a lie because most people will be forced out by their companies to Obama-care which will not allow you to use certain doctors. Obama care has a panel of 14 people to oversee and control how and when medicare will or will not pay for certain points of care. If you are over 70 and could have plenty years of life but Obama care reps deem a certain operation as too costly guess what you get a pain pill and no operation just because mother government says no! Obama and the lies of the left is going off of Ryan's original plan which he revisided--Obama is using old figures as always and lies--Obama has proven not to be trusted because of his many lies and broken promises!





















I also never said Medicare is a bad thing as I never mentioned Medicare, you did. Nor did I say that Social Security is a bad thing. I said that is Johnson would never had looted Social Security in the first place and set the precedent possibly it may have never occurred. Johnson set the precedent for looting the system and he was a Democrat. So the problem was created by the Democrats.
And yes the Republicans are selling themselves as the best to 'manage' and revamp those programs. And considering the job virtually every Democrat administration has done destroying them they should be given the chance.
Here is another example of a liberal Democrat President setting bad precedent. Bill Clinton worked to start changing our entitlement programs and had good ideas. His non-partisan support passed the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. An act that was supported by and praised by both parties. Now Obama, a Democrat, on July 12, 2012 announced that he and his administration had rewritten the law and gutted the federal work requirements that were the foundation of the 1996 re...
I also never said Medicare is a bad thing as I never mentioned Medicare, you did. Nor did I say that Social Security is a bad thing. I said that is Johnson would never had looted Social Security in the first place and set the precedent possibly it may have never occurred. Johnson set the precedent for looting the system and he was a Democrat. So the problem was created by the Democrats.
And yes the Republicans are selling themselves as the best to 'manage' and revamp those programs. And considering the job virtually every Democrat administration has done destroying them they should be given the chance.
Here is another example of a liberal Democrat President setting bad precedent. Bill Clinton worked to start changing our entitlement programs and had good ideas. His non-partisan support passed the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. An act that was supported by and praised by both parties. Now Obama, a Democrat, on July 12, 2012 announced that he and his administration had rewritten the law and gutted the federal work requirements that were the foundation of the 1996 reform law. The foundation that was praised and supported by both parties. Once again a liberal Democrat (just like Johnson) has set a precedent that is detrimental to the US rather than beneficial.
I also notice that you didn't make any statement regarding Obama's gutting of Clinton's 1996 Welfare Reform Act. I'm curious as to your opinon about it. Do you feel he was justified in doing so? Do you think his gutting of the federal work requirement implemented by the Clinton administration will have a detrimental effect on the Welfare system? What do you think Obama's motive was to gut a provision that had bi-partisan support when it was implemented? Just curious.
In as far as my "opinion" on the Obama / Clinton matter - might I suggest that you open a forum on that particular topic and I may enlighten you on my opinion on that subject within that forum.
And I see you avoid answering the matter on Obama gutting the welfare reform act. I expected as much.
Actually, I was looking to discuss and / or debate - but you apparently can NOT provide the particular legislation, in support of your allegation that LBJ "looted" Social Security.
Later
Ryan's 'Path to Prosperity' gives massive tax breaks to the wealthy but forces anyone on Medicaid and other social services to absorb a whopping 60 % of his spending cuts.
The more voters discover about Ken Doll # 1 and Ken Doll # 2 , the more they will withdraw in horror.
Katrina vanden Heuvel, Washington Post
Michelle Goldberg, The Daily Beast
Later.