Why should abortion be the most difficult decision a pro-choicer can make if there is nothing wrong with abortion? Be specific! Go!

Maybe not for her. But if I was pregnant it would be an easy decision for me. If I need the abortion, I'll get it done. Simple as that.

You'd think she wouldn't be so carefree killing a baby.

Maybe someday she can't have a child and hopefully regret her decision.

She says I this and I that and I felt no pain.....guess what witch your child did. Obviously you have no emotion and should never have a child.


Someday she might find she has a soul but right now it seems to be missing.

She didn't kill a baby. She killed what had the potential to become a baby.

Wrong. She killed a baby with it's own DNA. It's own heart beat at 22 days after conception with it's own blood not the mothers. It's own organs, It's own Pain. Wake up stupid. This is not the potential of a baby it is a baby.

It's ignorance like yours that is clueless is why it's so easy to destory precious life. Baby's do feel pain. Babies do feel the abortion and have proven to try to get away from the suction tube. The eyes are fully formed, their teeth buds are already developing.

She was 9 1/2 and that baby already has it's hands and feet and is sucking it's thumb at 12 weeks.

We a women that is murdered and pregnant the murder is charged with two births not one. It's called the connor law.

The ignorant calling the informed ignorant. How hilarious.
It is not a "baby". No one would define cells or a fetus as a baby. Hence the already provided titles. It probably still had it's gills at that point, since when have you known a "baby" with gills?
Ahh, see, there you display ignorance. A pregnant woman murdered.... in those cases the woman actually wanted the kid. Therefore it was a wrong and unlawful killing.
Educate yourself, and THEN you can go around oppressing women.

Why do you use the language to justify something you ultimately know to be wrong? Are you afraid to use science?

Language? What in the world are you trying to talk about?
I love science. Science is facts, evidence, proof. Science is the one thing pro-lifers "anti-women" like to avoid in such discussions.
Abortion is not wrong. It's a natural occurrence, whether inflicted or occurring on it's own. You can justify something as wrong, when it's essentially a parasite in a host's body. When it depends on someone else to live. It's rights end where her's begin.

"It's [Its'] rights end where her's begin."

And her rights began at her conception. But you know all about science so you already knew that.

She has no soul so she wouldn't understand what a baby's soul is Simmering. Women like that are clueless and hopefully should never give birth. Isn't it odd that those that want the abortion are those their parents didn't abort. So by her analogy if the mother wants the baby it's a baby but if the mother doesn't want the baby as she states it's just cells. Since I assisted in many an autopsy and saw a lot of babies in all stages I didn't see even one that ever had gills. I guess she must be talking about aborting a fish.

MyPaper blocked me. Apparently she isn't too confident in her position.

Rights do not begin at conception.
Otherwise a heck of a lot of women would be in trouble for the fertilized eggs that don't take. Otherwise doctors would be in trouble if they didn't implant surrogates or women with all the eggs that became fertilized. A living, breathing human is way superior to a clump of cells or underdeveloped fetus. If you care so much about them, they can implant all potentially about to be aborted things into you. Knock yourself out with that.
Apparently you lack any understanding of our legal system....

And also to comment to the person below... she apparently lacks biological and medical understandings.
Ever hear of evolution? Look at an underdeveloped fetus. It has what appear to be gill slits, due to adaptation and evolution.
And souls do not exist. Don't live in a fantasy fictional world. It's pathetic, and just shows how ignorant you are. Ignorance is never an excuse.

I the right to choose with the hope that people choose life. In other words while I am a pro-lifer, I do not want to government to have the power decide.

To answer the question at hand, a correct decision isn't only always an easy decision due to immense emotional attachment. Consider the case of an extremely dear pet who is ill, perhaps the best option is to choose to put the pet to sleep, but that pet is also a member of your family and so the choice is incredibly difficult.

Because their conscious bothers them when they kill there own flesh,and blood Dau!

Contrary to popular belief Pro-choicers aren't waiting to get knocked up just so they can have something to kill.
It's not an easy decision.

"It's not an easy decision."

But why is not an easy decision? That's my question. If there is nothing wrong with getting an abortion, what makes it difficult to do it?

not wrong in whos eyes?

Reread the question once you are done with the munchies.

nothing wrong with killing something YOU made or God for that matter ..pathetic

Try asking someone who has gotten an abortion, and then someone who considered getting one then decided against it.
Chances are you'd get a variety of reasons for both, therefore declaring it...
"not an easy decision."

I'm asking pro choicers in general, not anyone specific.

I wouldn't worry about asking Pro-Choicers/Pro-Lifers. All you're gonna get are debatable opinions. No answer. But If you ask someone's who's been there. You'll get some insight.

one side says is one says its not thats what im tring to say .govermengt just wants all choices taken away period