Watch what people are seeing and having second thoughts on obama.
Unemployment is still above 8 percent, job gains aren’t even keeping up with population growth, the economy is barely moving forward. And yet, according to most polls, the Romney-Ryan ticket is falling further and further behind. How can this be?
Because Republicans are failing the central test of electability. Instead of putting together the largest possible coalition of voters, they’re relying largely on one slice of America — middle-aged white men — and alienating just about everyone else.
Start with Hispanics, whose electoral heft keeps growing as they become an ever-larger portion of the electorate. Hispanics now favor President Obama over Romney-Ryan by a larger margin than they did six months ago.
Why? In last February’s Republican primary debate Romney dubbed Arizona’s controversial immigration policy – that authorized police to demand proof of citizenship from anyone looking Hispanic — a “model law” for the rest of the nation.
Romney then attacked GOP rival Texas Governor Rick Perry for supporting in-state tuition at the University of Texas for children of undocumented immigrants. And Romney advocates what he calls “self-deportation” – making life so difficult for undocumented immigrants and their families that they choose to leave.
As if all this weren’t enough, the GOP has been pushing voter ID laws all over America, whose obvious aim is to intimidate Hispanic voters so they won’t come to the polls. But they may be having the opposite effect – emboldening the vast majority of ethnic Hispanics, who are American citizens, to vote in even greater numbers and lend even more support to Obama and other Democrats.
Or consider women – whose political and economic impact in America continues to grow (women are fast becoming better educated than men and the major breadwinners in American homes). According to polls, the political gender gap is widening.
Why? It’s not just GOP senatorial candidate Todd Akin’s call to ban all abortions even in the case of “legitimate rape” (because he believes women’s bodies somehow reject violent sperm). The GOP platform itself seeks to bar all abortions, with no exception for rape or incest. And on several occasions Paul Ryan has voted in favor of exactly such legislation.
Meanwhile, Republican legislators in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Idaho, and Alabama have pushed bills requiring women seeking abortions to undergo invasive vaginal ultrasound tests. All told, over 400 Republican bills are pending in state legislatures, attacking womens’ reproductive rights.
Republicans have repeatedly voted against legislation giving women equal pay for the same work as men. Republicans in Wisconsin have even repealed a law designed to prevent employers from discriminating against women.
Or consider students – a significant and growing electoral force, who voted overwhelmingly for Obama in 2008. What are Republicans doing to woo them back?
Paul Ryan’s budget plan – approved by almost every House Republican and enthusiastically endorsed by Mitt Romney – would have allowed rates on student loans to double, adding an average of $1,000 a year to student debt loads. (Under mounting political pressure, House Republicans came up with just enough money to keep the loan program going safely past Election Day by raiding a fund established for preventive care in the new health-care act.)
Now Romney wants to hand the federal student loan program over to the banks, which will charge even more. Earlier this year he argued subsidized student loans were bad because they encouraged colleges to raise their tuition, and suggested students ask their families for money.
Republicans have even managed to antagonize seniors by seeking to turn Medicare into vouchers whose value won’t keep up with rising healthcare costs, and cutting $800 billion out of Medicaid (which many seniors rely on for nursing home care).
And, of course, they’ve come out against equal marriage rights for gay couples.
Romney, Ryan, and the GOP don’t seem to know how to satisfy their middle-aged white male base without at the same time turning off everyone who’s not white, male, straight, or middle-aged. Unfortunately for Romney and Ryan, the people they’re turning off are the majority.
ROBERT B. REICH,
Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, was Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including the best sellers “Aftershock" and “The Work of Nations." His latest, "Beyond Outrage," is now out in paperback. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine and chairman of Common Cause.
Read More: http://robertreich.org/post/31668931701
The members the tea party are simply non-thinking, easily misled people who know that the government is over spending but have no idea why.
Why hasn't Ryan or Willard told us what "tax loopholes" they are going to close? How are they going to pay for the new tax cuts in addition to the Bush tax cuts? And, exactly how is their plan going to create jobs? Here's a hint, they don't plan on paying for the new tax cuts and they don't plan on creating any new jobs. They are sticking to the stupid idea that simply cutting taxes will spur enough economic activity to create 250,000 jobs a month. It's the same B.S. sold to you George Bush, the owner of the worst job creation record in history.
Please educate this "18 year old kid" on how Willard's economic plan is going to create jobs and pay down the county's debt when it adds an additional $5 trillion to the deficit. You're in the know, right? You understand Willard's plan so enlighten the rest of us. What loopholes will Willard close to pay for his $5 trillion dollar tax cut? Please tell us because even conservative economists are having trouble making the math work.
Willard promised to add 12 million jobs in the next 10 years, which coincidentally is the same amount of jobs the Department of Labor said would be created if NOTHING different was done. In other words, Willard promised to do nothing. The Catholic Church jumped down Lyin' Ryan's throat because his plan puts the burden of paying for his tax cuts on the poor.
So genius, instead of accusing me of not being country first and 18 years old, explain how Willard and Lyin' Ryan will fix the economy with more tax cuts and no way to pay for them?
Thanks in advance the education.
I guess I'll need years of counseling to get over this tragedy.
Here's my favorite part of this argument. If, like Republicans always say, the House is Responsible for the purse strings, why aren't you looking at the REPUBLICAN controlled house? They are the people responsible for spending? Using Right Wing logic, shouldn't you be unhappy with the House since Republicans control it?
The Republican's have only controlled the House for a year and a half. When they try to reign in his spending Harry Reid blocks the Senate from even voting on what they put forth. And sycophants like you cry that they are the ones trying to shut down the government and blocking Obama's desires to spend even more.
What new policies are adding up to so much money. Remember, the President cannot spend a dime without the approval of Congress. I guess you are admitting that we are simply keeping up with the bills run up by Republicans. Why else would they have to reign in spending?
Reagan ran on a pledge to cut taxes in 1980. He won and then he cut taxes. Then the economy failed and he enacted the largest tax increase in U.S. history up to that point. Reagan's budget director, David Stockman, admitted supply-side was only a gimmick to get his boss elected. They never believed it would actually work.
The lesson? Supply-side economics, or trickle-down, has been tried several times and it has never worked. Most recently George W. Bush tried it and he turned a $127 billion budget surplus into a $750 billion deficit almost overnight with his unpaid-for tax cuts for the rich. Then he took us into two unpaid-for wars, and enacted an unpaid-for prescription boondoggle for the pharmaceutical industry.
Then he handed off the toxic mess to Obama and returned to Dallas. We are still dealing with his debacle.
Dick (head) Morris will tell you ANYTHING that will keep him fed!
The only thing the Gingrich - Armey "revolution" did was turn this country into a divided nation that it has NEVER recovered from!
Here is an interesting sidebar. Most of today's billionaires made their fortunes when the top tax rate was around 50%, and it didn't stop them. If anything it helped them, because there were more consumers for their products, since they all had jobs to earn money for purchasing the products.
Dick Morris has sold out to Fox. Now he is a RW shill, and can't be trusted to tell the truth.
Gingrich? He used up whatever political capital he had when he shut down the government. Clinton outmaneuvered him at every turn, he got re-elected, and Gingrich was out of the House in disgrace following the 1998 midterms, and he had to pay a $300,00 fine for corruption.
Meanwhile, Clinton balanced the budget and left his successor with a surplus of $127 billion. We all know what he did with it.
Now the unemployment rate is 8.1% and we have been adding jobs for 30 consecutive months. If Obama had not enacted ARRA when he did, we would now be in a depression, according to most economists.
ARRA saved or created more than five million jobs. In addition, the auto industry bailout saved at least 1.3 million more.
Obama has spent his entire first term dealing with Bush's recession. Economists believe we will have recovered by the end of his second term. He can't fix in a couple of years what it took Bush eight years to screw up.
Oh, you don't know that do you? President Obama's spending increases are lowest in decades.