Why Presient Obama invited Egypt's Islamist leader to U.S.?
jt
2012/07/08 23:24:11
|
|
|||||
|
8 votes
|
|
21% | |||
|
24 votes
|
|
63% | |||
|
6 votes
|
|
16% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Rob Williams 2012/07/09 00:54:18Just as usual with any others
+5Better that he's cosy with a Muslim like Mohamed Morsi than a Catholic like Robert Mugabe...
The United States was founded on freemasonry beliefs, not Christian. If it was founded on Christianity than the Nation's religion would be Christian, most likely a Protestant. But it is not.
We have freedom OF religion, Pure Abrahamic Nations do not have that.
remember that. I know the history, and I know my old religion. hence i know longer follow it.
Yes, the Arabics captured the holy land and a number of others fron the Byzantine Empire. (Although it was primairly Jerusalem that the target was for both sides)
And the Byzantine asked for help to liberate them. So, the only way they could muster enough volunteers to fight retake the "holy lands" was to give the people something worth fighting for
i.e. Wealth, fame, glory, and an undisputed path to Heaven...so it became a war for Christianity
That was the first crusade. And the Christian Saviors didnt give it back to the Byzantine Empire....probably because that was the first time in 461 years that Jerusalem was under Christian Control.
2nd Crusaders, the Saracens took back Jerusalem
Than we have the 3rd Crusade Which is the most famous, the Crusaders under King Richard the Lionheart, lost to Saladin, BUTthe beauty of this relationship, is that Saladin actually allowed Christians in theHoly land. and jews.
Peace.
than the 4th crusade, than the 5th, and the mini crusades, all the way up to the ninth one, which by this time im sure the Saracens leaders hadhad enough
Basically the point of the story is this. You seem to think that because theSaracens saw a chance to expand that it was bad
well..in that case, every European Nation that went to war with the sarac...
Yes, the Arabics captured the holy land and a number of others fron the Byzantine Empire. (Although it was primairly Jerusalem that the target was for both sides)
And the Byzantine asked for help to liberate them. So, the only way they could muster enough volunteers to fight retake the "holy lands" was to give the people something worth fighting for
i.e. Wealth, fame, glory, and an undisputed path to Heaven...so it became a war for Christianity
That was the first crusade. And the Christian Saviors didnt give it back to the Byzantine Empire....probably because that was the first time in 461 years that Jerusalem was under Christian Control.
2nd Crusaders, the Saracens took back Jerusalem
Than we have the 3rd Crusade Which is the most famous, the Crusaders under King Richard the Lionheart, lost to Saladin, BUTthe beauty of this relationship, is that Saladin actually allowed Christians in theHoly land. and jews.
Peace.
than the 4th crusade, than the 5th, and the mini crusades, all the way up to the ninth one, which by this time im sure the Saracens leaders hadhad enough
Basically the point of the story is this. You seem to think that because theSaracens saw a chance to expand that it was bad
well..in that case, every European Nation that went to war with the saracens.. who expanded to Africa, and the Americas, must also be "bad"
For the committed the same exact thing as the Saracens.
Yet now in the present, we have the United States, where we have Christian leaders, Jewish Leaders, Islaminst leaders, American Citizens.
So, just because we give respect to an Islamist leader, is not a bad thing. Its a diplomatic thing. It means he knows how to be mature.
My point is that religion is only part of the person's make up and, maybe, not the one that should be emphasised.
** Also, they will give each other the New World Order hand shake and double wink. **