Why Liberals Honor Treason & Hate America?"Perhaps Berkeley California needs a good old barn burning, complete with torches and pitchforks!" Kevin McCullough
Kevin McCullough
Why Liberals Honor Treason & Hate America?
"Perhaps Berkeley California needs a good old barn burning, complete with torches and pitchforks!"
These were my sentiments at the hearing of what the lunatics who run
Liberalville USA have actually taken a vote on and passed in their most
recent city council meetings.
In short, they want to subvert justice and accelerate the killing of
American military and the sources who are helping them in Afghanistan
and Iraq.
They also wish to honor a person who has committed more than 250,000
acts of treason (or at best espionage) against his nation, his strict
military code and command, and the general welfare of even his own
family.
Such was the case with PFC Bradley Manning, who now sits awaiting the
day to go on trial for the crimes against his own. In what has become
the-all-too-famous narrative, armed only with a Lady Gaga CD and a
little bit of time, PFC Manning downloaded a few bucketfuls of documents
that told many secrets of our operations against the terrorists. Once
sold they were put on display by Julian Assange of Wikileaks and now
those who seek to murder Americans in cold blood have reams of
information they did not previously have.
There has never been a clearer act of treason in American history. And
Manning deserves to be brought before Congress, tried for the charge,
and executed upon a guilty verdict.
But he's not the one that worries me now.
Sure he's in military custody, he's gonna face a tough go of it by every
measure regardless of what happens, but there are two possible
consolation prizes with him. Either he's in prison for the rest of his
life, or his neck gets stretched in Times Square before the watching
public and we tell tales to the future generations that "actively
assisting the enemy" is treason in the United States.
But like I said, he's not the one I'm any too worried about presently.
The nutcase council members in Berkeley California on the other hand,
leave me greatly disturbed. For they have proffered a hope that PFC
Manning might be freed, and pending that, they hope to honor him with an
award, a parade, maybe ice-cream and a cake, maybe ponies and
rainbows... Who knows?
Manning is viewed by the city council as someone who has expressed
behavior that is heroic. Some of them went so far as to imply that he
was a great American:
“If he did what he’s accused of doing, he’s a patriot and should get a
medal,” said Bob Meola, the Berkeley peace and justice commissioner who
authored the resolution. “I think the war criminals should be the ones
prosecuted, not the whistle-blowers.”
Now I don't know what a "peace and justice commissioner" is and I likely
would laugh out loud if I read the actual job description that was
attached to it, but Bob Meola's comment has to be one of the top three
dumbest things to be uttered by a public official in 2010. Can anyone
beat it?
I also have noticed that liberals like Meola keep using this word that
they don't know the definition of: patriot. Miriam Webster's' Dictionary
tells us a patriot is one who vigorously supports their country and
defends her against all enemies. Actually I'm beginning to doubt whether
Meola would be able to identify a dictionary.
A majority vote moved the piece of legislation through the council. Unfortunately 70% of the council voted in favor of passage.
But please tell me that even in Berkeley there is at least one public
official with something other than spun sugar sitting in their head
where their brain is supposed to reside.
Okay there was at least one - Commissioner Thyme Seigel:
"We're just sitting here in Berkeley - we don't know that Afghani
informants aren't being murdered because of these leaks," she said.
"Bradley Manning sounds like a very sincere person, but I'm sorry, we
really do have enemies, and it's not clear at all what the effects of
these WikiLeaks are."
Other than that though, no real hope.
Code Pink got into the action as well when their co-founder Medea
Benjamin went on cable news this week to attempt to defend the town's
actions. Benjamin attempted to decry the policies but was willing to
give a pass to the traitor.
And let there be no doubt, a traitor he is.
He was motivated by sheer greed. What was it, all of $3,500 from the big spender Assange?
But here's what Meola and Benjamin and the Berkeley city council fail to
admit. If Bradley Manning's ultimate goal was to reveal secrets in
order to bring about reform, giving them to an investigative reporter in
America would have been a more appropriate option.
The truth is he didn't do it for altruistic purposes, but for some cash. Assange took the material and now our enemies have it.
The lessons we need to learn from the Bradley Manning episode are pretty
serious. The damage he has done will be counted in lives lost, plans
scrapped, networks destroyed, and those he knows being put in greater
harm. What we could do without are these far-left lunatics that wish to
bark at the moon, see boogeymen that aren't there, and scream that the
sky is anything other than blue.
Someone would think that people in Berkeley would know enough of the
reality that the United States lives in today to not think his actions
heroic. Perhaps they even do. For some of them I suspect Manning is
being used as a pawn to vault themselves into the realms of
celebrity-ridiculousness.
Then again that's something a little crowd with some torches and
pitchforks could easily care for there on the steps of the Berkeley City
Hall.
Kevin McCullough
Kevin McCullough is the nationally syndicated host of "The Kevin
McCullough Show" weekdays (7-9am EST) & "Baldwin/McCullough Radio"
Saturdays (9-11pm EST) on 215 stations & Sirius/XM . His new book from Thomas Nelson Publishers, "No He Can't" hits streets March 2011.
Sorry, but P*ss on Berkley, the traitor Manning, and especially The nutcase council members in Berkeley California.
Loosing an election isn't going to change a thing for hard core Liberals.
Comparing the Liberals and the Communists is so typically American.
In Western Europe people do call them self Socialist and Communist. Here in the US Socialist and Communist call themselves Progressives and Liberals. However, they are all Marxist because they support the teachings and ideology of Karl Marx.
The government that rules Spain, Portugal, and Greece are from the Socialist Party of their country. They call themselves socialist. In America they are from the Democrat party and call themselves Liberals or Progressives.
We have, have had and will have Socialist governments. No Communist governments, though, I suppose you are aware of that.
And here Obama is considered slightly left of center. Senator Bernard Sanders is more like a European Socialist.
- BTW, we also have national constittutions, national supreme courts, and we even have a European court of human rights.
Obama is a Marxist Liberal way to the left. There isn't much difference between Sanders and those that call themselves Liberals and Progressives. They are all Marxist.
We don't need National Constitutions, or European courts of human rights. We do need a fair world trade court.
Sixty-three Big Government Liberals from the House were tossed in the streets on elections day 2010. It should set Liberals back for years.
Republicans get to draw the lines in the House because they picked up many state Legislations, the most since 1928 and they have 29 of the Govenors.
New Low in Support for Health Care Reform
http://blogs.abcnews.com/then...
Go for it!
Just one example of this "barrage": I just posted more than 25 comments on a poll asking Sodaheads if they want to repeal Obamacare because 95% of more than 900 people had given "yes" answers! A Soviet-type percentage.
This is why I asked if the "health" insurance mafia does not pay people to pose as ordinary citizens and post answers "en masse" on many sites, not just SH, of course.
You are more than likely against Labor Unions. Because Unions are communistic. But the 1st Amendment allows for Labor Unions. Check out the fact. Its called Freedom of Association. How can Captitalism allow for such a socialistic freedom?
Republicans controlled Congress for 12 years; 6 years under Clinton and 6 years under Bush. They created a total of 1.25 trillion dollars of public debt or 100 Billion per year and had an average unemployment rate of 4.61 percent.
Democrats controlled congress for a total of 45 months; 24 month under Bush and 22 months under Obama. They created 3.6 trillion dollars of public debt or 900 billion per year and had an average unemployment rate of 7.18 percent.
George Bush averaged a 5.3 percent unemployment rate. Obama is over 9 percent
http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servl...
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb...
Table 1.1
Glen Beck is the master mind of the plan. The signs are all around. American Corporations are doing business in communist China to learn their ways force Americans to buy from the Chinaman.
Did we become a dictatorship?
You need to produce facts with references, not just accusations. You need facts to produce a logical argument.
No, if big government is going to give away something like social security, why shouldn't I take it and at least invest it. I don't support Social Security or Medicare. I certainly would have been better off without it.
I will probably give it to my son. At least he won't get totally screwed when the pyramd scheme goes belly up. Why shouldn't he get it?
It will reduce the amount of taxes that other welfare programs are costing me.
Peace and Justice would be achieved by defending this Army Ranger convicted for killing the enemy...
http://www.defendmichael.com/
Torches and pitchforks will be raised by UCB students when their tuition goes up.
I am sick of these Liberals trying to control everyone else with their mental diease.
Is liberalism truly a mental disorder?
Michael Savage gets clinical support for his best-selling diagnosis
-----------------------------...
In 2006, radio talk-show icon Michael Savage released a book that quickly climbed to the top of the best-seller charts.
It was called "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder." His critics characteristically derided him for rhetorical overkill.
But later that same year another book was released with much less fanfare by a celebrated psychiatrist offering clinical evidence that supported Savage's diagnosis.
It was called "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness," written by Dr. Lyle Rossiter.
Two very different perspectives – same conclusion.
Whether or not you agree that liberalism is a mental disorder, you owe it to yourself to examine the evidence.
Through a compelling narrative of current trends and events, Savage chronicles the assault on the sacred pillars of American life (the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Ten Commandments, the Sanctity of Marriage) by the High Priests of Ultra-Liberalism and provides the remedy for freedom-loving Americans to effectively medicate the mental disease of modern liberalism and restore America's f...
Is liberalism truly a mental disorder?
Michael Savage gets clinical support for his best-selling diagnosis
-----------------------------...
In 2006, radio talk-show icon Michael Savage released a book that quickly climbed to the top of the best-seller charts.
It was called "Liberalism is a Mental Disorder." His critics characteristically derided him for rhetorical overkill.
But later that same year another book was released with much less fanfare by a celebrated psychiatrist offering clinical evidence that supported Savage's diagnosis.
It was called "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness," written by Dr. Lyle Rossiter.
Two very different perspectives – same conclusion.
Whether or not you agree that liberalism is a mental disorder, you owe it to yourself to examine the evidence.
Through a compelling narrative of current trends and events, Savage chronicles the assault on the sacred pillars of American life (the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Ten Commandments, the Sanctity of Marriage) by the High Priests of Ultra-Liberalism and provides the remedy for freedom-loving Americans to effectively medicate the mental disease of modern liberalism and restore America's former brilliance.
In each chapter, the Savage Spotlight of Truth casts its light on the tactics used by liberals to spread their leftist agenda and follow it with a dose of specific actions, arguments and activism that the listener can ingest to counter the left.
After all, as Savage said in his first No. 1 New York Times best-seller, "The Savage Nation," America's best days are in front of her, if the people have the guts to face the truth and apply themselves to repairing the foundation upon which this blessed nation was formed.
But then came Rossiter.
For more than 40 years, he diagnosed and treated over 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases, both state and federal, as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist retained by numerous public offices, courts and private attorneys. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.
Rossiter explains with great clarity why the kind of liberalism being displayed by Barack Obama can only be understood as a psychological disorder.
"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Rossiter. "Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."
"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do.
And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which overregulates and overtaxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."
Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:
* creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
* satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
* augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
* rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.
"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."