Quantcast

Why is there so much Anti-Israel sentiment by Ron Paul supporters on SodaHead?

Space Invader 2012/01/10 15:06:43
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Simple question; should be a simple answer.


To view what I'm talking about; here's an example.
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/the-zionization-of-amer...

Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Hobbitt / Oldsquid 2012/01/10 16:20:23
    None of the above
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +3
    WASHINGTON — A former aide to Ron Paul has labeled the Republican White House hopeful as "anti-Israel" after the rediscovery of racially charged newsletters published under the lawmaker's name in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The staunchly libertarian candidate "wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all," Eric Dondero wrote in a column for website RightWingNews.com published Monday. "He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations."

    Dondero, a senior aide from 1997 to 2003 and earlier an assistant in various campaign roles beginning in the late 1980s, said the Texas lawmaker "sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."

    However, he insisted that Paul is not a racist, as some critics have charged after the newsletters released in recent weeks foretold a "coming race war" in U.S. urban centers.

    "Is Ron Paul an anti-Semite? Absolutely no. As a Jew [half on my mother's side], I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened to over the years, or in my personal presence, that could be called, 'anti-Semite.' No slurs. No derogatory remarks," Dondero said.

    "Is Ron Paul a 'racist'[?] In short, no. I worked for...














    WASHINGTON — A former aide to Ron Paul has labeled the Republican White House hopeful as "anti-Israel" after the rediscovery of racially charged newsletters published under the lawmaker's name in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The staunchly libertarian candidate "wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all," Eric Dondero wrote in a column for website RightWingNews.com published Monday. "He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations."

    Dondero, a senior aide from 1997 to 2003 and earlier an assistant in various campaign roles beginning in the late 1980s, said the Texas lawmaker "sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."

    However, he insisted that Paul is not a racist, as some critics have charged after the newsletters released in recent weeks foretold a "coming race war" in U.S. urban centers.

    "Is Ron Paul an anti-Semite? Absolutely no. As a Jew [half on my mother's side], I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened to over the years, or in my personal presence, that could be called, 'anti-Semite.' No slurs. No derogatory remarks," Dondero said.

    "Is Ron Paul a 'racist'[?] In short, no. I worked for the man for 12 years, pretty consistently. I never heard a racist word expressed towards blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once," Dondero added.

    In a statement to CBS, the Paul campaign on Tuesday dismissed Dondero as a "disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues."

    The former aide "has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton told CBS.

    The Paul campaign did not immediately respond to AFP's request for comment.

    Paul already lacked key support from Republican Jewish leaders for his White House bid, largely over his consistent opposition to U.S. military aid to Israel, in synch with his views across the board against sending U.S. aid overseas, and scaling back U.S. military ambitions.

    Backing from influential Jewish leaders in the party is seen as key to gaining the Republican party nomination for president.

    Polls suggest that only around 2 percent of voters nationwide are Jewish, but they could wield decisive power in vital swing states such as Florida and Pennsylvania.

    Read more on Newsmax.com: Former Ron Paul Aide: He's Anti-Israel
    Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
    (more)

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • burningsnowman 2012/07/24 23:38:58
    None of the above
    burningsnowman
    +1
    It's not because he's "anti israel", it's because he's the only candidate talking about ending foreign aid. If he was genuinely anti-israel he wouldn't have voted AGAINST condemning Israel for their attack on the Iraqi Osirak reactor in 1981, unlike much of Congress at the time (ironic isn't it?). Part of his rationale for opposing foreign aid besides the principle of opposing tax payer money going to any foreign countries is that it restricts what Israel can do and some of it also goes to the Palestinians. Ron Paul has never proposed sanctions on Israel or anything like that.
  • Chaya2010 2012/04/16 15:37:36
    I don't know
    Chaya2010
    From the little I know Ron Paul y"s hates Jews and is against Israel he "understands Hamas"." It amazes me that a medical doctor that is supposed to be for preservation of life is for terrorists that are committed to genocide of not just Israelis but Jews collectively.
  • SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY 2012/01/11 04:20:04
    Undecided
    SK-LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY
    +1
    Probably just following and drinking the juice of their fearful leader. Stupid is as stupid does.
  • Raven 2012/01/10 18:36:44
    None of the above
    Raven
    +2
    Many of his supporters are on the fringe right and left. Fringe rt are antisemites. Fringe left are anti zionists.
  • Chaya2010 Raven 2012/04/16 15:34:43
    Chaya2010
    +1
    Well said, thanks.
  • Hobbitt / Oldsquid 2012/01/10 16:20:23
    None of the above
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +3
    WASHINGTON — A former aide to Ron Paul has labeled the Republican White House hopeful as "anti-Israel" after the rediscovery of racially charged newsletters published under the lawmaker's name in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The staunchly libertarian candidate "wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all," Eric Dondero wrote in a column for website RightWingNews.com published Monday. "He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations."

    Dondero, a senior aide from 1997 to 2003 and earlier an assistant in various campaign roles beginning in the late 1980s, said the Texas lawmaker "sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."

    However, he insisted that Paul is not a racist, as some critics have charged after the newsletters released in recent weeks foretold a "coming race war" in U.S. urban centers.

    "Is Ron Paul an anti-Semite? Absolutely no. As a Jew [half on my mother's side], I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened to over the years, or in my personal presence, that could be called, 'anti-Semite.' No slurs. No derogatory remarks," Dondero said.

    "Is Ron Paul a 'racist'[?] In short, no. I worked for...














    WASHINGTON — A former aide to Ron Paul has labeled the Republican White House hopeful as "anti-Israel" after the rediscovery of racially charged newsletters published under the lawmaker's name in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The staunchly libertarian candidate "wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all," Eric Dondero wrote in a column for website RightWingNews.com published Monday. "He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations."

    Dondero, a senior aide from 1997 to 2003 and earlier an assistant in various campaign roles beginning in the late 1980s, said the Texas lawmaker "sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."

    However, he insisted that Paul is not a racist, as some critics have charged after the newsletters released in recent weeks foretold a "coming race war" in U.S. urban centers.

    "Is Ron Paul an anti-Semite? Absolutely no. As a Jew [half on my mother's side], I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened to over the years, or in my personal presence, that could be called, 'anti-Semite.' No slurs. No derogatory remarks," Dondero said.

    "Is Ron Paul a 'racist'[?] In short, no. I worked for the man for 12 years, pretty consistently. I never heard a racist word expressed towards blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once," Dondero added.

    In a statement to CBS, the Paul campaign on Tuesday dismissed Dondero as a "disgruntled former staffer who was fired for performance issues."

    The former aide "has zero credibility and should not be taken seriously," Paul spokesman Jesse Benton told CBS.

    The Paul campaign did not immediately respond to AFP's request for comment.

    Paul already lacked key support from Republican Jewish leaders for his White House bid, largely over his consistent opposition to U.S. military aid to Israel, in synch with his views across the board against sending U.S. aid overseas, and scaling back U.S. military ambitions.

    Backing from influential Jewish leaders in the party is seen as key to gaining the Republican party nomination for president.

    Polls suggest that only around 2 percent of voters nationwide are Jewish, but they could wield decisive power in vital swing states such as Florida and Pennsylvania.

    Read more on Newsmax.com: Former Ron Paul Aide: He's Anti-Israel
    Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
    (more)
  • Space I... Hobbitt... 2012/01/10 16:28:39
    Space Invader
    +2
    there is something there; isn't there?
  • Hobbitt... Space I... 2012/01/10 16:32:53
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +2
    He is an Anti Semitic Bigot...
  • Carson Hobbitt... 2012/01/11 06:16:50
    Carson
    I would like to ask you for some proof of this. Now I am not saying you are wrong, but as Ron Paul supporter myself I do not see how he is "an Anti Semitic Bigot"(hobitt)
    One could also argue that he is pro-Israil because I do believe that the leader of the country asked president Obama to leave Israil(I could be wrong here, please correct me if I am). And on the Iran issue the United States has no rights to tell Iran what to do(this part I do not believe that I am wrong).
  • Hobbitt... Carson 2012/01/11 15:02:10
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +1
    Ron Paul's Anti-Israel Record and the Republican Primaries
    By Alan Steinberg | May 18th, 2009 - 7:25pm
    | More

    For the Jewish community of New Jersey, Ron Paul is a most disturbing individual. His fervent campaign against the American-Israel alliance is a direct contradiction of the political conservatism of Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp, for whom support for Israel was at the core of their foreign policy positions.

    Equally disturbing, however, was Ron Paul’s condoning of anti-Semitism in the course of his 2008 campaign for the Republican Presidential nomination by his acceptance and retention of a $500 campaign contribution from Don Black, a neo-Nazi leader who runs a vicious white supremacist website, Stormfront.org. Paul also posed for a picture with Black.

    To get the full extent of Paul’s anti- Israel campaign, go to the website, www.ronpaul.com, and note the following quote from the webpage, "Ron Paul on Israel", http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-0...

    "On January 9, Ron Paul addressed Congress to voice his opposition to a House resolution expressing strong support for Israel in its invasion of Gaza, and branding Hamas as a terrorist organization."

    Paul’s message speaks for itself: Hamas is not a terrorist organization, in spite of its launching of over 1,000 rockets against citizens of I...







































    Ron Paul's Anti-Israel Record and the Republican Primaries
    By Alan Steinberg | May 18th, 2009 - 7:25pm
    | More

    For the Jewish community of New Jersey, Ron Paul is a most disturbing individual. His fervent campaign against the American-Israel alliance is a direct contradiction of the political conservatism of Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp, for whom support for Israel was at the core of their foreign policy positions.

    Equally disturbing, however, was Ron Paul’s condoning of anti-Semitism in the course of his 2008 campaign for the Republican Presidential nomination by his acceptance and retention of a $500 campaign contribution from Don Black, a neo-Nazi leader who runs a vicious white supremacist website, Stormfront.org. Paul also posed for a picture with Black.

    To get the full extent of Paul’s anti- Israel campaign, go to the website, www.ronpaul.com, and note the following quote from the webpage, "Ron Paul on Israel", http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-0...

    "On January 9, Ron Paul addressed Congress to voice his opposition to a House resolution expressing strong support for Israel in its invasion of Gaza, and branding Hamas as a terrorist organization."

    Paul’s message speaks for itself: Hamas is not a terrorist organization, in spite of its launching of over 1,000 rockets against citizens of Israel. The United States should not support Israel in its campaign of retaliation against a vile terrorist organization whose "Culture Minister", Atallah Abu Al-Subh greeted the news of 9-11 with the words, "Allah has answered our prayers." And campaign donations from neo-Nazis will be welcomed.

    In view of this record of Ron Paul, why would gubernatorial candidate Steve Lonegan and 23rd District State Senate candidate Mike Doherty enthusiastically accept the endorsement of Ron Paul ? Furthermore, why would Mike Doherty have actually made the horrendous misjudgment to support Ron Paul for President in 2008 ?

    In terms of Republican conservatism, one matter is abundantly clear: By accepting cheerfully the Paul endorsement, both Steve Lonegan and Mike Doherty have fully divorced themselves from Reagan/Kemp conservatism and have placed themselves squarely in the paleo-conservative camp.

    Reagan had been a fervent supporter of the establishment of the State of Israel as far back as during his service as president of the Screen Actors’ Guild during the late 1940s. As I mentioned in my previous PolitickerNJ.com article, "Jack Kemp, Rest in Peace", Kemp had a lifelong personal bond with the American Jewish community, resulting from his growing up in a Jewish section of Los Angeles. When Kemp died, his passing was mourned in Israel as the loss of a friend who also had been a solid supporter of the cause of Soviet Jewry.

    Ronald Reagan received a Republican Presidential election record 39 % of the Jewish vote nationally in the 1980 election. In New Jersey, the Jewish community is a major voting constituency, whose presence is largely in suburbs where a Republican gubernatorial candidate will have to do well this fall, particularly in Bergen County. Lonegan’s alliance with Ron Paul will make it virtually impossible for him to receive more than 15 percent of the New Jersey Jewish vote in the unlikely event of his defeating Chris Christie in the primary. When you combine an abysmally low vote total by Lonegan in the Jewish community with a certain less than five per cent vote total in the African-American and Hispanic communities, respectively, there is not a hope of his defeating Corzine.

    The election, however, is not the only reason for both Lonegan and Doherty to repudiate the Paul endorsement. Ronald Reagan’s favorite governor was Tom Kean, whose vision for the Republican Party always has been "The Politics of Inclusion". If the New Jersey GOP is to keep alive the Kean vision of inclusiveness, it is absolutely essential that Republican candidates for statewide office and the legislature divorce themselves of any connection with Ron Paul. The course Lonegan and Doherty must take to repudiate their respective Ron Paul endorsements is clear. By not repudiating their Ron Paul endorsements, they will be repudiating the heritage of Reagan and Kemp and the vision of inclusiveness of Kean.




    Former Ron Paul Aide: He's Anti-Israel
    Wednesday, 28 Dec 2011 12:32 PM
    Share:



    WASHINGTON — A former aide to Ron Paul has labeled the Republican White House hopeful as "anti-Israel" after the rediscovery of racially charged newsletters published under the lawmaker's name in the 1980s and 1990s.

    The staunchly libertarian candidate "wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all," Eric Dondero wrote in a column for website RightWingNews.com published Monday. "He expressed this to me numerous times in our private conversations."

    Dondero, a senior aide from 1997 to 2003 and earlier an assistant in various campaign roles beginning in the late 1980s, said the Texas lawmaker "sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs."

    However, he insisted that Paul is not a racist, as some critics have charged after the newsletters released in recent weeks foretold a "coming race war" in U.S. urban centers.

    "Is Ron Paul an anti-Semite? Absolutely no. As a Jew [half on my mother's side], I can categorically say that I never heard anything out of his mouth, in hundreds of speeches I listened to over the years, or in my personal presence, that could be called, 'anti-Semite.' No slurs. No derogatory remarks," Dondero said.

    "Is Ron Paul a 'racist'[?] In short, no. I worked for the man for 12 years, pretty consistently. I never heard a racist word expressed towards blacks or Jews come out of his mouth. Not once," Dondero added.

    Paul already lacked key support from Republican Jewish leaders for his White House bid, largely over his consistent opposition to U.S. military aid to Israel, in synch with his views across the board against sending U.S. aid overseas, and scaling back U.S. military ambitions.

    Backing from influential Jewish leaders in the party is seen as key to gaining the Republican party nomination for president.

    Polls suggest that only around 2 percent of voters nationwide are Jewish, but they could wield decisive power in vital swing states such as Florida and Pennsylvania.

    Read more on Newsmax.com: Former Ron Paul Aide: He's Anti-Israel
    Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
    (more)
  • Carson Hobbitt... 2012/01/12 02:13:57
    Carson
    I realy like how much work you put into this and find it better and more in depth then most news channels and I commend you for that!! How ever I do not consider these actions racist(except for the one with the NEO-Nazi bastard) But more so a little imbalanced on his part and he should try to adress Jewish problems more. And wishing the states of Israil did not exist could also be considered him being a little tired of Israil always being so important in the US(It should though, in my opinion. After all it is a tiny friendly nation that is constantly under attack from other nations) Now on the subject of the US Israil allience, I AM FOR IT(this deserves caps) but unfortunatly it is rather costly and looking at the americain debt. I think its time to cut back. L'Chaim my friend.
  • Hobbitt... Carson 2012/01/12 02:51:46
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +1
    Israel get's 3 Billion from us the rest of the Arab nations get 12 billion it is not the money I would not care if it got cut off... as long as all of it got cut... I am worried that Paul would side with the Arabs rather than Israel if there were a conflict and we all know it is coming..
  • Carson Hobbitt... 2012/01/12 02:55:35
    Carson
    I consider the people of Israil to be Arab, but I get your point and I agree. The only nation that should get funding from the US is Israil. About 200million sounds right to me. And to the rest of them the US should give 1 penny and then let them rot.
  • Hobbitt... Carson 2012/01/12 04:23:15
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +3
    Jews are not Arabs.. I am a Jew we may both be Semitic people but that is where the similarities end.
  • Carson Hobbitt... 2012/01/12 04:49:17
    Carson
    +1
    Sorry, I assumed because of the area. I truly am sorry, and I hope you accept my apology.
  • Hobbitt... Carson 2012/01/12 14:44:24
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +1
    Accepted.. The Arabs have been trying to get rid of us since biblical times.
  • Carson Hobbitt... 2012/01/13 05:46:37
    Carson
    +1
    Which is stupid, considering that Hebrew's in general have done so much for society and could have done so much for there society.
  • Hobbitt... Carson 2012/01/13 14:42:07
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +1
    Yeah, well tell them that...
  • Bocephus Hobbitt... 2012/01/13 19:28:21 (edited)
    Bocephus
    +1
    Correct. Jews are seperat Palestinians or Arabs, are often more closely tied to relatives in Syria or Jordan than any other .

    In the 1980s, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Jews are a race, at least for purposes of certain anti-discrimination laws. Their reasoning: at the time these laws were passed, people routinely spoke of the "Jewish race" or the "Italian race" as well as the "Negro race," so that is what the legislators intended to protect.

    But many Jews were deeply offended by that decision.
    Hebrew is a much better term.
  • Hobbitt... Bocephus 2012/01/13 19:40:45
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    Actually you are correc that Hebrew or even Judean is a better term.
  • Bocephus Hobbitt... 2012/01/13 19:47:44
    Bocephus
    True to a point. Not all Israelite are from Judea. Love your people by the way.

    The name JEW actually comprises a nickname. Nicknames may eventually be incorporated as the primary name of an ethnic group. In the Bible and Hebrew language, the proper name for the people of the tribe of Judah was Yahudi or Judahite. Another variation is Judean, meaning resident of Judah or Judea. Over the years, the word Yahudi was corrupted and shortened to Jew.

    By the time of Jesus Christ, all Israelites were referred to as Jews. Paul called himself both an Israelite and a Jew. The term “Jew” came to refer to all descendents of Abraham through Isaac and Jacob!
  • Hobbitt... Bocephus 2012/01/13 20:12:21
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +1
    This should clear some of that up..


    There's no such thing as "Palestine"

    "Palestine" is the name that the Romans gave to the land of Israel when they conquered this land 2000 years ago and Wikipedia explains (Israel) :

    It was during this time that the Romans gave the name Syria Palaestina to the geographic area, in an attempt to erase Jewish ties to the land. The Mishnah and Jerusalem Talmud, two of Judaism's most important religious texts, were composed in the region during this period. The Muslims conquered the land from the Byzantine Empire in 638 CE. The area was ruled by various Muslim states (interrupted by the rule of the Crusaders) before becoming part of the Ottoman Empire in 1517.
    And also the Greeks prior to the Romans:

    Abba Eban wrote in his book 'My nation - The history of the nation of Israel' in page 64 that the Greek historian Herodotos used the name 'Palestina', that is 'Pleshet', for the first time as a complete name for all the land of Israel while in the past it referred only to the populated areas of the Philistines themselves.

    Abba Eban added that the Philistines, who settled down in the shore area, were the first ones with whom the Greek invaders encountered thus the Greeks called all the land in the name of the Philistines.

    There was never in the history of...























































































    This should clear some of that up..


    There's no such thing as "Palestine"

    "Palestine" is the name that the Romans gave to the land of Israel when they conquered this land 2000 years ago and Wikipedia explains (Israel) :

    It was during this time that the Romans gave the name Syria Palaestina to the geographic area, in an attempt to erase Jewish ties to the land. The Mishnah and Jerusalem Talmud, two of Judaism's most important religious texts, were composed in the region during this period. The Muslims conquered the land from the Byzantine Empire in 638 CE. The area was ruled by various Muslim states (interrupted by the rule of the Crusaders) before becoming part of the Ottoman Empire in 1517.
    And also the Greeks prior to the Romans:

    Abba Eban wrote in his book 'My nation - The history of the nation of Israel' in page 64 that the Greek historian Herodotos used the name 'Palestina', that is 'Pleshet', for the first time as a complete name for all the land of Israel while in the past it referred only to the populated areas of the Philistines themselves.

    Abba Eban added that the Philistines, who settled down in the shore area, were the first ones with whom the Greek invaders encountered thus the Greeks called all the land in the name of the Philistines.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" nation.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" state.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" kingdom.

    There were never in the history of the world "Palestinian" kings.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" capital.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" essence.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" heritage.

    There was never in the history of the world a "Palestinian" culture.

    The "Palestinians" are ARABS who were brought to the region by the Ottoman empire as part of the Muslim occupation in the region and later on also by the British who entered masses of Arabs from the surroundings while closing Israel to its genuine owners. Arabs from countries like Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Yemen emigrated to Israel in the beginning of the 20th century to look for employment (due to the development of this land by the Judean inhabitants) while pretending to be living in Israel "for thousands of years..." These Arabs are definitely not the tribes from Crete who settled down in the 5 cities of Gaza strip after the Exodus of Israel from Egypt. These tribes were called Philistines and they weren't Arabs at all and the nowadays "Palestinians" are definitely not their descendants. The Philistines don't exist as a nation nowadays.

    There's no "Palestinian" nation but an ARAB one which went out of the Arabian Peninsula and occupied dozens of lands, including the land of Israel.

    According to the Israeli Wikipedia the Arabs who were living in the land of Israel started to call themselves "Palestinians" only after the establishment of Israel in 1948 and prior to it they called themselves just 'Arabs' and this is how they called their organizations ('Arab Higher Committee') and their struggles ('The Great Arab Revolt') and nicknamed the land of Israel in different names such as 'Southern Syria'.

    Zuheir Mohsen is widely known for having made the following statement in a March 1977 interview with the Dutch newspaper Trouw:
    "The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.

    For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."
    There was an Israeli state in the land of Israel 2000 years before the prophet of Islam dreamt that he's flying on a "magical horse" from Mecca to Jerusalem.

    There was an Israeli nation in the land of Israel.

    There was an Israeli kingdom in the land of Israel.

    There were Israeli kings in the Israeli kingdom of Israel.

    There was an Israeli capital in the kingdom of Israel.

    There was and there is an Israeli essence.

    There was and there is an Israeli heritage.

    There was and there is an Israeli culture.

    Israel isn't just a name of a state. It's first and for all a name of a nation (Am Yisrael). Israel is the name of the father of the nation (Jacob) and Israelis are his descendants. The real meaning of the word 'Israeli' is someone who belongs to the nation of Israel and not only "a citizen of a state called Israel". The word 'Israeli' (Yisraeli) is mentioned in the Torah and we use it in Hebrew till this day. Yisraelim in plural.

    Don't say "Jews", say Judeans. Yehudi in Hebrew is Judean in English, not "Jew". "Jews" is a mockery word for Judeans. The word 'Judeans' was invented by gentiles. When the Persians, the Greeks and the Romans conquered the land of Israel they called all the Israelis in the name 'Judeans' because at those days the tribe of Judah was the biggest and the dominant tribe which survived the exile of Assyria in which 10 tribes of Israel were exiled. The tribe of Judah lived in the Judean desert thus the gentiles who occupied the land of Israel called the members of this tribe (and also the ones of Benjamin and Levi who joined it) in the name 'Judeans'.

    When Israelis (Judeans) who live abroad go to synagogue they don't read about Judeans and not about "Jews" in the prayer books nor in the Torah but about 'The Nation of Israel', 'The Children of Israel', 'The House of Israel', 'Israeli', 'Shema Yisrael', etc. They are Israelis because they belong to the nation of Israel even if they aren't citizens of a state called Israel. Both of the words 'Judeans' and 'Israelis' refer to nationality, to ethnic identity and not to religion. Judeans are members of the tribe of Judah and not "people who believe in Judaism". And the nation isn't called Judah but Israel, and so does the land and in the future the 10 tribes will return to this nation.

    Israelity ("Judaism") isn't a "religion" but a historical national covenant between G-d and the Israelis.

    That's why Arab citizens of Israel don't define themselves as Israelis but as Arab/"Palestinian" citizens of a state CALLED Israel. They aren't members of the Israeli nation but of the Ishmaelite nation. Ishmael used to shoot arrows at Isaac (father of Israel) while saying: "I'm only playing..." That's why there's no "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" but a WAR that the Ishmaelites/Arabs opened on the Israelis. Also Muhammad murdered Israelis in Saudi Arabia who refused to accept his murderous pagan dream.

    That's why we should say: End the Arab occupation in the land of Israel!

    Couple of facts that the haters of Israel don't like:

    Israel became a state in 1312 B.C., two millennia before Islam.

    Arab refugees from Israel began calling themselves "Palestinians" in 1967, two decades after (modern) Israeli statehood in 1948.

    After conquering the land in 1272 B.C., Israelis ruled it for a thousand years and maintained a continuous presence there for 3,300 years.

    The only Arab rule following conquest in 633 B.C. lasted just 22 years.

    For over 3,300 years, Jerusalem was the Israeli capital. It was never the capital of any Arab or Muslim entity. Even under Jordanian rule, (East) Jerusalem was not made the capital, and no Arab leader came to visit it.

    Jerusalem is mentioned over 700 times in the Tanach, but not once is it mentioned in the Qur'an.

    King David founded Jerusalem; Mohammed never set foot in it.

    Israelis pray facing Jerusalem; Muslims face Mecca. If they are between the two cities, Muslims pray facing Mecca, with their backs to Jerusalem.

    In 1948, Arab leaders urged their people to leave, promising to cleanse the land of Israeli presence. 68% of them fled without ever setting eyes on an Israeli soldier.

    Virtually the entire Israeli population of Muslim countries had to flee as the result of violence and pogroms.

    Some 630,000 Arabs left Israel in 1948, while close to a million Israelis were forced to leave the Muslim countries.

    In spite of the vast territories at their disposal, Arab refugees were deliberately prevented from assimilating into their host countries. Of 100 million refugees following World War 2, they are the only group to have never integrated with their co-religionists. Most of the Israeli refugees from Europe and Arab lands were settled in Israel, a country no larger than New Jersey, USA.

    There are 22 Muslim countries, not counting "Palestine". There is only one Israeli state.

    Fatah and Hamas constitutions still call for the destruction of Israel.

    During the Jordanian occupation, Israeli holy sites were vandalized and were off limits to Israelis. Under Israeli rule, all Muslim and Christian holy sites are accessible to all faiths.

    The U.N. was silent when the Jordanians destroyed 58 synagogues in the old city of Jerusalem. It remained silent while Jordan systematically desecrated the ancient Israeli cemetery on the Mount of Olives, and it remained silent when Jordan enforced apartheid laws preventing Israelis from accessing the temple mount and western wall.

    Arabs started all five wars against Israel, and lost every one of them.
    (more)
  • Bocephus Hobbitt... 2012/01/13 21:01:49
    Bocephus
    +1
    All 100% true. I can tell you know your history. Exciting times we are living in. I am glad there are still smart people on earth .

    Take care and shalom
  • Hobbitt... Bocephus 2012/01/13 21:06:44
    Hobbitt / Oldsquid
    +1
    Shalom to you and yours as well
  • Space Invader 2012/01/10 15:09:04
    I don't know
    Space Invader
    +2
    I guess they are of the mindset that they don't like Israelis and Zionists like Ron Paul evidently doesn't...

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2013/05/19 23:31:46

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals