Why Harry Reid not releasing his own tax returns?
jt
2012/08/07 06:18:23
|
|
|||||
|
11 votes
|
|
46% | |||
|
9 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
4 votes
|
|
17% | |||
Presidents and Presidential candidates in the past have released several years of tax information. There is no law that dictates this, but it shows a willingness to be earnest and honest about how honorably you have conducted yourself financially.
This will follow Mitt. Those in his own party have said, just release them and take the lumps. Mitt has said he has paid " lots and lots of taxes". Good. Let's see them.
2. Harry Reid never went before the American people and said "Vote for me because I'm a successful businessman" and then expect the American people to take his word for it.
I believe Jimmy Carter was a business man, he was a highly successful peanut farmer. How did that work for ya.
this old tax returns , are just that , old news.
how about the $15 TRILLION DEBT ?
how about the economy ?
how about the 9 % unemployment ?
how about we work on things that will fix the problem in Wash .D C, ?
do as I say, not as I do ...
non issue for both Mitt and ried ,,,
it is about the economy , it is about the high unemployment , it is about $15 TRILLION DEBT.
lib's stop the distractions, lets get back to fixing the country ....
The GOP hasn't wanted to fix this country in years... If people act like this 15T happened over the last 3.5 years, you know what it started in the 80's with that idiot Reagan..
the other 10 happened over the last 200 years...
damn, obomma sure can spend money ,, other people's money that is....
Also to say the other 10T happened over the last 200 years is not true either, the other 10T came from the last 30 years.. You're not a very honest person..
and the $ 5 TRILLION IN DEBT UNDER obomma administration,,,, it has a lot to do with obomma not knowing how to run this large of an organization..
maybe he should have stayed in his community organizator role that he has a couple of years of expierence ... not that he did such a great job at that either.
the facts are the facts.
and what is this last sentence of yours ? trying to attack me personaly ?
well, it seems you are all in with the obomma method of operation,, when the facts reveal some thing you do not want to be public... attack the other person..
You said;
"the other 10 happened over the last 200 years".
That is not true our deficit use to non-existent till the 1900's
http://www.usgovernmentspendi...
"At the beginning of the 20th century total government debt was equally divided between federal and state and local debt, totaling less than 20 percent of GDP. After World War I, the federal debt surged to 35% of GDP. But by the mid 1920s federal debt had declined to below 20 percent of GDP with state and local debt rising to 16 percent of GDP.
Starting at 45 percent of GDP in 1941 federal debt zoomed, reaching almost 122 percent of GDP in 1946 after the end of the war, with state and local debt adding another 7 percent. For the next 35 years successive governments brought down the debt, but then came President Reagan. He increased the federal debt up over 50 percent of GDP".
So explain how "the other 10 happened over the last 200 years"?
I really want to hear you explain that one...
Oh I was wrong about the 1980's Reagan just increased it by 50%..
And most of Obama's debt is related to the recession those are FACTS...
"You're not a very honest person.."
No attack an observation. prove me wrong by proving your fact..
Remember to explain your fact "the other 10 happen...
You said;
"the other 10 happened over the last 200 years".
That is not true our deficit use to non-existent till the 1900's
http://www.usgovernmentspendi...
"At the beginning of the 20th century total government debt was equally divided between federal and state and local debt, totaling less than 20 percent of GDP. After World War I, the federal debt surged to 35% of GDP. But by the mid 1920s federal debt had declined to below 20 percent of GDP with state and local debt rising to 16 percent of GDP.
Starting at 45 percent of GDP in 1941 federal debt zoomed, reaching almost 122 percent of GDP in 1946 after the end of the war, with state and local debt adding another 7 percent. For the next 35 years successive governments brought down the debt, but then came President Reagan. He increased the federal debt up over 50 percent of GDP".
So explain how "the other 10 happened over the last 200 years"?
I really want to hear you explain that one...
Oh I was wrong about the 1980's Reagan just increased it by 50%..
And most of Obama's debt is related to the recession those are FACTS...
"You're not a very honest person.."
No attack an observation. prove me wrong by proving your fact..
Remember to explain your fact "the other 10 happened over the last 200 years"
I really want to hear you explain that one, if you can prove it I'll apologize for my observation...
first the easy thing.
our country founded in 1776 . up to about 2008 we accumulated $ 10 trillion in debt,,
then obomma in 2008 , we got an additional $ 5 TRILLION..
now , wasn't that easy to explain / understand ?
second, this will be a tough one , IMO , for you
no hate, no name calling , no personal attacks ,, your on short lease .
keep it civil or stay away.
I neither want, need or will accept the hate ,, take it some where else.
That's dishonest..
And Obama's 5 is mostly due to the Recession and Bush's policies he's had to continue.
No problem I just get sick of idiots like you refusing to admit when you are wrong. and You WERE.
So yes you are dishonest...
They are Huge Hypocrites.
Plus they lie constantly on here..
As this information came to me from a reliable source, my Nokia cell phone, I have NO choice but to consider it accurate! I DEMAND THAT DINGY HARRY IMMEDIATELY RELEASE HIS TAX RECORDS FROM 2010 / 2011!!!!!!!!!!
it is about the economy, the $15 trillion debt , lets get back to fixing America. we have been a ship drifting in the sea for the past 3 years, time to get back on course..