Why do the GOP defend Romney's hidden taxes but insisted that Obama show a birth certificate?
Monilove
2012/08/17 15:03:51
|
|
|||||
|
0 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
13% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
38% | |||
|
1 vote
|
|
13% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
38% | |||
The republican party knows Mitt is up to no good and he is out to destroy the middle and lower class through tax increase. What is so hysterically funny is how they defend him on hiding money and is keeping his tax returns a big secret! And no one in the GOP has a problem with that.
















Any fraud on Romney's part has *NOT* been proven in the least.
If there is a case of fraud, that is a job for the IRS, not the dumbass administration that gets LEOs murdered by selling guns to Mexican drug cartels and block prosecution of the guilty.
Obama campaign is trying to make a big deal out of Romney's tax's and accusing him of murder. Why do you suppose Obama doesn't spend more time illustrating all the success he has had over the past 3 1/2 years? Oh yeah - there is none.
Romney's tax infatuation is simply a deflection away from Obama's ineptitude. If they were really interested in tax cheats, they could start with Tim Geithner, Secretary of the Treasury, and known tax cheat. But he is an Obamunite, a 'made-man' kind of thing.
All the best.
I brought up Newsweek not because I find it credible but rather that the libs and progressives do.
But I see that meaningful debate is frightening you away. So, skitter away little, frightened sociologist. Go hide among your 'source factors'. I'll not darken your door with reality any longer. But perhaps you should block me - you know, just to be sure. You wouldn't want actual members of society filling your head with their thoughts and ideas that might lead to greater understanding.
Mitt only gave us an abstract of birth. When the President provided an abstract of birth Cons cried that an abstract was unacceptable.
ITS ONLY OK FOR THE WHITE GUY.