Why do lying filth accuse this company of hate without any proof?

by Georgia50 Posted 2012/06/21 00:42:59

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Lying murderers all think alike, so ignore them.	3 votes	25%
	It takes a chicken to hate a chicken.	0 votes	0%
	I have some other idea on the matter.	9 votes	75%

More polls by Georgia50

Jackie 2012/06/24 02:29:08

I have some other idea on the matter.

+1
Because they are mentally ill.

reply
Boo 2012/06/21 21:06:54

I have some other idea on the matter.

+1
Leftist anti-Christian hypocrits. They are as, if not more, intolerant than the Christians they criticize for not embracing their lifestyles!

reply
J 2012/06/21 20:25:01

I have some other idea on the matter.

+1
Satan's top priority is to destroy families. Once this is done, he has free reign. And whether people realize it or not, they are fighting Satan's battle for him when they oppose what God sanctifies.

reply
aneed2know 2012/06/21 09:57:37

I have some other idea on the matter.

+1
maybe because they did what others say they did,. ever thought of that?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

http://equalitymatters.org/fa...

reply
Georgia50 to aneed2know 2012/06/21 14:01:40

+2
A position is not "anti-gay" because the gay community says so. A position is anti-gay because the facts reveal a hostile bias to gays. Making a donation to organizations that are not sympathetic to each and every item on the gay socio-political agenda does not constitute a hostile bias.

reply
J to aneed2know 2012/06/21 20:26:09

+1
So, we can say that any organization that supports gays, hates families and family values.

reply
Flamingo Flame Gem *AFCL* 2012/06/21 03:22:28

I have some other idea on the matter.

+3
Liberals are known for vomiting out B.S. all the time........

reply
Walt 2012/06/21 01:22:08

I have some other idea on the matter.

+5
They hate Chick-fil-a because they know it is owned by a Christian and they will do whatever they can to destroy his business. It's the liberal way.

reply
The Elitist Libtard SodaJerk 2012/06/21 01:03:12

I have some other idea on the matter.

+1
I've only heard about this Chick-fil-A thing on Sodahead Today.

reply
Zuggi 2012/06/21 00:53:40

I have some other idea on the matter.

+2
Because they donate money too hate groups.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 00:55:27

+2
I can't seem to find a Yellow Pages listing of hate groups. Are they foreign-based?

reply
randy to Zuggi 2012/06/21 00:58:42

+2
Which ones?

reply
Zuggi to randy 2012/06/21 01:03:43

+3
Exodus Institute, Eagle Forum, Family Research Council, among others.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 01:10:23

+1
If we were to add together all of the gays who have been killed by these alleged hate groups, how would that number compare to the number of gays killed by gay partners knowingly infecting their sex partners with AIDS? Would the number of deaths from these "hate groups" be greater than or less than the number of gays killed by other gays?

Do you believe the above question is a legitimate barometer of hatred? Why or why not?

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 01:24:16

+4
Compare the number of people killed by Hitler to the number of people killed by smallpox; smallpox comes out way ahead. Is that a legitimate barometer of anything? Of course not.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 01:49:23

So knowingly infecting unsuspecting sex partners with AIDS is ok, but donating money to pro-family groups is hatred? I don't see how your contrast bears that out.

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 01:54:58

+4
I have no idea what the relevance of the fact that some people act like scum regarding sex has to do with donating money to hate groups is.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 02:01:29

The relevance is in the fact that one produces a body count--yet is ignored, the other does not--yet is labelled hate.

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 02:45:20

+3
Riiight, the reparative gay therapy of Exodus International doesn't hurt aaaannnnyyyone.

And how many people who know they have AIDS have sex unprotected? I know of one case, and it was a man sleeping with women.

reply
Ozzyboy to Zuggi 2012/06/21 02:54:13

+1
Isn't it in Africa that men with aids believe they can cure it by raping virgins? If they didn't know they had aids then why would they try to cure it by attacking innocent women?

reply
Zuggi to Ozzyboy 2012/06/21 03:04:40

+2
Well, I was talking America.

reply
Ozzyboy to Zuggi 2012/06/21 13:27:56

+1
Aids are aids no matter where it is. Men in America give women all kinds of diseases and visa versa, all the time. It should be a criminal charge to do so to anyone.

reply
Zuggi to Ozzyboy 2012/06/21 17:44:53

+1
Perhaps knowingly or intentionally, but not negligently or recklessly.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 03:08:33

If a person believes that therapy (or counseling) is an appropriate way to handle their homosexual tendencies, should they be free to pursue that angle? Does Exodus force people into their program? If not, how is that a form of hatred?

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 03:21:47

+2
Yes, churches and families force people into the program. And it and similar projects are definitely linked to the gay suicide problem.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 04:57:36

I believe you'll find that gay suicide is an independent phenomena even among gays with no connection to a religious organization or family background. Certainly it cannot be said to be solely associated with programs like Exodus. That said, I think most Christians would oppose coercion of adult homosexuals.

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 11:13:41

And I think you're wrong. Look at the rates in Bachmann's district.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 03:12:03

I have no idea what the numbers are, but in a documentary on homosexuality years ago, a young man stated openly that he had AIDS, had unprotected sex on a regular basis, and had no intention of stopping. The point is that there was no response to his position, and their remains no response to such behavior in the gay community apart from PSA-type advisories. It is certainly not labelled "hate."

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 03:21:02

+3
And he would be essentially thrown out of the homosexual community. No one would have sex with him.

Protection and testing are gospel for gay men.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 04:45:23

I believe you will find that mortality rates in the gay community suggest otherwise. In fact, it's in deference to the gay community that the death toll from unprotected gay sex is not more commonly known. (Of course it's also true that a number of gay "operators" are bi-sexual and contract AIDS from heterosexual activity as well.)

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 11:14:52

The disease rate in the gay community spread most in the 80s, when AIDS was new. Today is a completely different thing.

reply
Georgia50 to Zuggi 2012/06/21 13:58:53

+1
You've made my point. That is the popular view, but it's not borne out by mortality statistics.

reply
Zuggi to Georgia50 2012/06/21 17:45:33

+1
New infections are what counts. People who are dying today could have been infected 20 years ago.

reply
SK-LIBE... to Zuggi 2012/06/21 03:27:27

+3
nice dodge!! pathetic!

reply