Quantcast

Why do Liberals think that government should take care of them from cradle to grave??

☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!! 2013/02/28 07:06:46
Political ignorance?
Laziness?
No,personal responsibility?
They trust in the government as their own personal god??
Do not want to be self reliant??
They want mommy or nanny government to babysit them??
Undecided
All of the above
None of the above
You!
Add Photos & Videos
I mean what has happened to self- reliance and personal responsibility?? Why a nanny state and why do liberals think government should babysit us?? I mean the Constitution says to promote the general welfare not provide it?? Why do Liberals think government should take care of them from cradle to grave??


Why do Liberals think that government should take care of them from cradle too grave

Attention liberals, progressives, socialists, communists & other delusional left wing nut jobs & wackos. These videos require a minimal amount of cognitive skills, reasoning ability, rationale, & more than a double digit IQ to view & understand them. If you don't know what these skills are, then you probably don't have them, & you should NOT watch this video, as it will leave you totally confused & just as ignorant as you were to begin with.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Risk 2013/02/28 13:44:52 (edited)
    All of the above
    Risk
    +26
    There's a big difference between truly needing welfare and those that have become habitual societal leeches ! welfare cartoon

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Mike 2013/03/11 18:03:48
    None of the above
    Mike
    +1
    Because by 1932, food riots were starting to break out, and the official unemployment rate had reached 25%
    This was back in those idyllic days when the post office was the only contact most citizens ever had with the federal government, and we had almost none of that "tyrannical" government regulation. Everyone back then enjoyed the right to freedom to starve, to live in a "Hooverville dwelling, to sleep under a complimentary hoover blanket, and to travel free of charge by train (in freight car class, that is).
  • AM 2013/03/06 18:28:49
  • Sir Bud. 2013/03/06 15:06:34
    Undecided
    Sir Bud.
    +1
    Yep,"only the strong should survive" in a Conservative state where those born with Social and Economic advantages are rewarded and promoted and those born with Social and Economic disadvantages are punished and ignored as a matter of principal.Conservatism cannot accept the fact of innate human capability and diversity and disregards the coincidence of birth,while conveniently contending that everyone born regardless where and into which socioeconomic situation,is equipped with the same potential and confronted with the same restrictions.

    It is understandable therefore that those who were fortunate to be born into a wealthy and Conservative family social environment are ignorant of the social realities of the nations community.The most anti social conservative type though as history has proved,are those pseudo Conservatives who attribute themselves with the identity of conservatism attempting to replace their inferiority complex received after experiencing personal and social rejection.These are the type who are unable to accept their own imperfection-who in response therefore label themselves and identify themselves with Conservatism and obsessively crusade to discover the imperfection of others to protect their own ego.Hitler for one,was a classic example of this-a man who ...

    Yep,"only the strong should survive" in a Conservative state where those born with Social and Economic advantages are rewarded and promoted and those born with Social and Economic disadvantages are punished and ignored as a matter of principal.Conservatism cannot accept the fact of innate human capability and diversity and disregards the coincidence of birth,while conveniently contending that everyone born regardless where and into which socioeconomic situation,is equipped with the same potential and confronted with the same restrictions.

    It is understandable therefore that those who were fortunate to be born into a wealthy and Conservative family social environment are ignorant of the social realities of the nations community.The most anti social conservative type though as history has proved,are those pseudo Conservatives who attribute themselves with the identity of conservatism attempting to replace their inferiority complex received after experiencing personal and social rejection.These are the type who are unable to accept their own imperfection-who in response therefore label themselves and identify themselves with Conservatism and obsessively crusade to discover the imperfection of others to protect their own ego.Hitler for one,was a classic example of this-a man who in his youth failed to reach is objectives,was rejected and could not accept the fault was within himself-he could not accept his own imperfection and convinced himself he was a victim of the imperfection of the society he lived in.When and while reaching power-his attitude attracted the same amongst the mass-a nation suffering from a destroyed national identity and ego and rejection.Thus in power the Nazis targeted the"weak"by punishment and the more capable and stronger were rewarded.Fascism will therefore see promoting the welfare state as providing welfare and not motivating everybody on the basis of equality while accepting the facts of human diversity.

    These principals is what Conservatism feeds on and the more extreme conservative the more division between the weaker,less advantaged,the advantaged and elite.
    (more)
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/06 16:03:20 (edited)
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +3
    Not the job of the Federal government to feed, cloth and take care of the poor..Constitution says to promote the general welfare not provide..It is the job of faith based organization for that role..Government just wants you to be its little slave..
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/11 22:28:49
    Sir Bud.
    The Government is the nations voice,hands and eyes and is accountable for the nations security and welfare-our security and welfare,and just as the Dark Ages proved-not the duty of and resting on good luck or not of the power and human benevolence qualities of any one religion.We had that scenario in Europe in the 17th century causing escape and emigration to America in the first place.Seems you need a history lesson.Google the "Mayflower"or something as the last thing America needs is idiots advocating to take America back to 17th England.lol.
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/12 05:08:42
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +2
    Well our government is nothing like how it was when its was established..We have a tyrannical government now..They are defintely not looking out for We The People!!
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/12 14:46:45 (edited)
    Sir Bud.
    The Magna Carta in England was made public in 1215(keep in mind 90% of the people couldnt read and write)which could be compared in principal to the American Constitution drawn up by the FF's(from the seventy FF's only 38 showed up to sign according to my research).In both cases,both declared the Constitutional laws of the land and both at the time were compatible to the time.But since the 13th century and the late 18th society the world has changed,-knowledge,morals and technology-its a very different world compared to that in History.Laws made in the past over a course of time HAVE to be examined today and revised if needed to be compatible to the society we live in today.

    Of course that is a very dangerous thing in principal,but we cannot expect the guys who drew up the British Magna Carta and the American Constitution to have been able to visualize how society would develop in the future.And just because it is the law does not mean that it is right necessary(am sure you agree on that-as imagine a new universal Gun law is made for example).Times have changed and we have to adapt and laws need to be revised otherwise those laws made previously may or will hold us back.

    A tyrannical government?. Did the American people choose the FF's to speak for them at the time or did the FF...

    The Magna Carta in England was made public in 1215(keep in mind 90% of the people couldnt read and write)which could be compared in principal to the American Constitution drawn up by the FF's(from the seventy FF's only 38 showed up to sign according to my research).In both cases,both declared the Constitutional laws of the land and both at the time were compatible to the time.But since the 13th century and the late 18th society the world has changed,-knowledge,morals and technology-its a very different world compared to that in History.Laws made in the past over a course of time HAVE to be examined today and revised if needed to be compatible to the society we live in today.

    Of course that is a very dangerous thing in principal,but we cannot expect the guys who drew up the British Magna Carta and the American Constitution to have been able to visualize how society would develop in the future.And just because it is the law does not mean that it is right necessary(am sure you agree on that-as imagine a new universal Gun law is made for example).Times have changed and we have to adapt and laws need to be revised otherwise those laws made previously may or will hold us back.

    A tyrannical government?. Did the American people choose the FF's to speak for them at the time or did the FF's choose themselves?.There were 4 million "Americans"living at the time and all a diversity of nationalities and religious beliefs(or not)etc.How much did the FF's consider the Indigenous native Indians and all other ethnic minorities?.What did the Constitution which they compiled do for them?.

    We automatically accept and acknowledge an elite of 70 guys to have the right and authority to draw up a set of "ethic rules" of society-a society they personally visualized without question-and you question the government today elected by the people of America?. Sounds more to me a simple case of others not seeing things the way you do and so they are wrong and you are right.
    (more)
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/12 15:16:42
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +1
    I am right....They have already attacked privacy by a survellance, Big Brother society, the Patriot Act, look at TSA?? They are working on free speech and now guns..It is a subtle process to lure We The People asleep!
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/12 15:29:22
    Sir Bud.
    Wait till the Cons get into the White House the next time and you will wish Obama was back when comparing.The Gun law of 1791 with a population of 4 million etc etc is no longer applicable in the 300 million population of 21st century modern America.Stricter gun laws are needed-not a ban.
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/12 15:31:27
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/12 15:42:21
    Sir Bud.
    18th century yes-21st no.
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/12 15:51:17
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +2
    Yes, yes..So we defeat a tyrannical government with BB guns, muskets or low powered pistols and shotguns??
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/12 20:18:02
    Sir Bud.
    Civilians who arm themselves because they don't happen to like the President and Government America chose and with military force want to threaten and take them down-are terrorists and tyrants-whether home grown or foreigners like the Taliban etc.
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/15 15:20:07
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +2
    No when you have an Un- Constitutional regime that wants to disarm, citizen we have a right to fight back against tyranny! thomas jefferson on guns
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/15 16:32:00
    Sir Bud.
    So you personally lost the vote and now go for the "government is a unconstitutional regime"and think you are"we"of course.Much luck..
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/15 16:36:06
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +2
    The election had 2 people who were part of the CFR and Bilderbergs..The NWO picks its 2 puppets and We The People are dupped in thinking we vote??

    joeseph stalin on voting
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/15 16:41:23
    Sir Bud.
    Take your issue up with the Supreme Court-not with me,thanks.
  • DizziNY 2013/03/06 09:38:34
    Laziness?
    DizziNY
    +3
    Self-centeredness.
  • Singerar 2013/03/06 03:15:59
    None of the above
    Singerar
    +4
    I'm a Liberal and I do NOT believe this. I understand however that when people are in need, they should eat. We are American. We do NOT want to turn into a third world country where people die in the streets.
  • ☆The Ro... Singerar 2013/03/06 06:47:00
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +6
    If Obama keeps printing up money and spending like he is, we will be bankrupt..We are on our way of being another Greece!
  • Singerar ☆The Ro... 2013/03/06 07:02:20
    Singerar
    +3
    No we are not. Stop listening to FOX.
  • ☆The Ro... Singerar 2013/03/06 07:06:46 (edited)
  • Sir Bud. ☆The Ro... 2013/03/12 15:39:50
    Sir Bud.
    Rather quit listening to you-although you guys have done a great job and twice!.lol.
  • DizziNY Singerar 2013/03/06 12:30:15
  • ☆The Ro... DizziNY 2013/03/06 12:33:38
  • DizziNY ☆The Ro... 2013/03/06 13:37:36
    DizziNY
    +3
    Facts don't register with liberals (progressives/communists).

    lazy occupy wall street people
  • Singerar ☆The Ro... 2013/03/07 20:53:31
    Singerar
    +2
    How many times have you posted THIS graphic!!!

    Do you HAVE an original poster thought?
  • ☆The Ro... Singerar 2013/03/09 07:00:04
    ☆The Rock☆ * AFCL* The Sheriff!!
    +3
    yes a bunch!
  • Sir Bud. Singerar 2013/03/13 22:15:05
    Sir Bud.
    +1
    Lets help..LOL.

     Tea Bagger Stupid Cartoon
  • Singerar Sir Bud. 2013/03/13 22:16:13 (edited)
  • Sir Bud. Singerar 2013/03/13 22:17:18
  • Singerar Sir Bud. 2013/03/13 22:21:56
    Singerar
    +1
    He DEPENDED on the poor to be stupid. Most of those are Con's!!
  • Sir Bud. Singerar 2013/03/13 22:23:31
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/15 15:21:23
  • Sir Bud. Singerar 2013/03/12 15:38:05
    Sir Bud.
    +1
    Let them-as so far Fox has done a great job collecting the fools and turning them into even bigger ones,which helped Obama twice!.
  • ☆The Ro... Sir Bud. 2013/03/15 15:22:31
  • matthew... ☆The Ro... 2014/06/26 10:38:01
    matthew.lopez.3576
    +3
    Or India.
  • AJ 2013/03/05 13:39:33
    All of the above
    AJ
    +3
    I don't think it's JUST Liberals.
  • Apache 2013/03/05 07:33:52
    All of the above
    Apache
    +4
    Combine your descriptors & that's my comment. I think all libs should be conscripted, minimum 2 yrs service, at least they will have some first hand experience of hard work & loyalty to your country.
  • cindy c... Apache 2013/03/17 02:48:26
    cindy crowsnest
    +1
    animated liberal cat

    I think your answer is purrrrr fect
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 30 Next » Last »

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/10/21 07:10:38

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals