Quantcast

Why Do 70 Federal Agencies Have Armed Agents?

✿✿✿RoseD1st✿✿✿ 2013/09/16 17:52:55

Written By : John Hawkinsarmed epa


The recent uproar over armed EPA agents descending on a
tiny Alaska mining town is shedding light on the fact that 40 federal
agencies – including nearly a dozen typically not associated with law
enforcement — have armed divisions.


The agencies employ about 120,000 full-time officers authorized to
carry guns and make arrests, according to a June 2012 Justice Department
report.


Though most Americans know agents within the Drug Enforcement Agency
and the Federal Bureau of Prisons carry guns, agencies such as the
Library of Congress and Federal Reserve Board employing armed officers
might come as a surprise.



The incident that sparked the renewed interest and concern
occurred in late August when a team of armed federal and state officials
descended on the tiny Alaska gold mining town of Chicken, Alaska.


The Environmental Protection Agency, whose armed agents in full body
armor participated, acknowledged taking part in the Alaska Environmental
Crimes Task Force investigation, which it said was conducted to look
for possible violations of the Clean Water Act.


The FBI, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management and
Park Service are among 24 federal agencies employing more than 250
full-time armed officers with arrest authority, according the federal
report, which is based on the 2008 Census of Federal Law Enforcement
Officers.


The other 16 agencies have less than 250 officers and include NOAA as
well as the Library of Congress, the Federal Reserve Board and the
National Institutes of Health.


The number of federal department with armed personnel climbs to 73
when adding in the 33 offices of inspector general, the government
watchdogs for agencies as large as the Postal Service to the Government
Printing Office, whose IG has only five full-time officers.


Why does the EPA need armed officers to look for violations of the
Clean Water Act? Why does the Federal Reserve Board and Library of
Congress need armed officers? Why do so many federal agencies need to
have employees that are packing heat? It would be one thing if they
simply had security guards on premises, but as you see with the EPA,
when a government agency has guns, it looks for any excuse to use them.


It’s especially ironic that the federal government is looking for any
excuse to take away the 2nd Amendment rights of the American people
while government agencies appear to be looking for any excuse to arm
themselves. Congress should look into this issue and if they don’t see a
good reason for these agencies to have armed agents, they should cut
off the funds they’re using for weaponry.

Read More: http://www.rightwingnews.com/guns/why-do-70-federa...

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • keeper 2013/09/16 18:24:48
    keeper
    +6
    I thought the liberals didn't like guns!! Or is it they don't like other people to have guns??

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • j2 2013/09/19 13:38:26
    j2
    +1
    Fire in the hole!

    fire hole

    The EPA was probably trained in firearm safety and tactics by the NYPD also.
  • Technotrucker_exposingthetruth 2013/09/19 03:50:50
    Technotrucker_exposingthetruth
    +2
    Why is the Social Security Admin armed? I mean seriously? The fact is, none of these agencies have Federal Jurisdiction in any state. They have to obtain cooperation from the local Sheriff and Police to serve any warrants. So if you want to get to the root of the issue, only elect a Sheriff that will refuse Federal criminals in his/her county.
  • JonnyN 2013/09/16 18:35:18
    JonnyN
    +4
    Congress should start with the EPA, and work its way into the others. There is no reason on earth for an agency dealing with the 'environment' needing to be armed! If in the course of their investigation of the environment, and weapons are needed, they should call on those police forces with the guns! Plain to see this is a clear cut case of Gov't. agencies run gone rogue with power. And if Congress can not see this, then they too, are part of the problem!
  • Billy M 2013/09/16 18:32:58
    Billy M
    +3
    More cops means more arrests and we secure our position as the #1 lock up country in the world. The way the average government agencies treat the citizens they need armed guards.
  • keeper 2013/09/16 18:24:48
    keeper
    +6
    I thought the liberals didn't like guns!! Or is it they don't like other people to have guns??
  • Striker 2013/09/16 17:59:30
    Striker
    +6
    because we have a government of Force, as are all governments. Ours is getting worse by the day.
  • Quietman ~PWCM~JLA 2013/09/16 17:55:02
    Quietman   ~PWCM~JLA
    +5
    A false sense of self importance!

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/12/22 07:04:17

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals