Quantcast

Why are the poorest states republican?

flaca BN-0 2012/05/12 01:07:10

41-50 poorest states are all red.
New mexico,
Louisiana,
South Carolina,
Montana,
Tenneseee,
Oklahoma,
Alabama,
Kentucky,
Arizona,
West Virginia,
Mississippi

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_income
You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • JT 2012/05/28 12:07:00
    JT
    +3
    They're not all Republican. New Mexico has voted Republican once in the last 5 presidential elections. More importantly, New Mexico and West Virginia are overwhelmingly Democratic at the state and local level. Also I think Arizona is supposed to be Arkansas. But none of that is the reason. Most of those states are in the South, and have always been poor, despite being solidly Democratic for many generations. Many of these are, however, some the fastest growing states. Thought he South is still poorer, it is not nearly as far behind as it was just a few decades ago. Republicans at the state level are good for the economy, as businesses tend to set up shop in the states with the lowest taxes and fewest regulations. Nationally, not so much, as their military spending bankrupts us.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • JT 2012/05/28 12:07:00
    JT
    +3
    They're not all Republican. New Mexico has voted Republican once in the last 5 presidential elections. More importantly, New Mexico and West Virginia are overwhelmingly Democratic at the state and local level. Also I think Arizona is supposed to be Arkansas. But none of that is the reason. Most of those states are in the South, and have always been poor, despite being solidly Democratic for many generations. Many of these are, however, some the fastest growing states. Thought he South is still poorer, it is not nearly as far behind as it was just a few decades ago. Republicans at the state level are good for the economy, as businesses tend to set up shop in the states with the lowest taxes and fewest regulations. Nationally, not so much, as their military spending bankrupts us.
  • JT 2012/05/28 12:06:46
    JT
    They're not all Republican. New Mexico has voted Republican once in the last 5 presidential elections. More importantly, New Mexico and West Virginia are overwhelmingly Democratic at the state and local level. Also I think Arizona is supposed to be Arkansas. But none of that is the reason. Most of those states are in the South, and have always been poor, despite being solidly Democratic for many generations. Many of these are, however, some the fastest growing states. Thought he South is still poorer, it is not nearly as far behind as it was just a few decades ago. Republicans at the state level are good for the economy, as businesses tend to set up shop in the states with the lowest taxes and fewest regulations. Nationally, not so much, as their military spending bankrupts us.
  • flaca BN-0 JT 2012/05/28 21:50:10
    flaca BN-0
    yeah they're not all republican, but in the top ten, the bulk are.
  • ☮ Ron ☮ Paul ☮ 2012! ☮ 2012/05/12 19:34:16
    ☮ Ron ☮ Paul ☮ 2012! ☮
    +1
    Usually poorer people are more religious and conservative. They tend to live normal low-key lives because of their poor stature.
  • Waldorf 2012/05/12 13:01:45
    Waldorf
    Because the North left them that way after the Civil War. Also because of the boll weevil ending cotton as a cash crop, now tobacco. Because imports ruined the textile and furniture industries. Because unions have made it difficult to locate plants in the non-union South.

    The relative strength of the North has a lot to do with the auto industry, now fading quickly.
  • lm1b2 2012/05/12 12:56:10
    lm1b2
    Because Blacks are Democrats.
  • flaca BN-0 lm1b2 2012/05/14 00:36:25
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    not in Louisiana.
  • lm1b2 flaca BN-0 2012/05/14 13:31:44
    lm1b2
    Hard to believe after Bush left them to shift for themselves for 3 days during katrina while he was on vacation,evidently he liked Latinos better then blacks!
  • Lady Whitewolf 2012/05/12 10:24:12
    Lady Whitewolf
    +3
    Makes ya wonder, huh? The buckle of the bible belt!
  • BALANCED 2012/05/12 04:33:38
    BALANCED
    +3
    because uneducated red state people actually believe the GOP line that more money for rich people is good for poor people -
    why - because the GOP waves a flag & holds up a bible -
    thats all folks !!
  • Lady Wh... BALANCED 2012/05/12 10:24:36
    Lady Whitewolf
    +2
    SO agree!
  • Z 2012/05/12 02:57:44
    Z
    +2
    Because they also have the lowest cost of living, and poverty rates are based on national income level. In other words, they are poor compared to the nation in income, but actually have lower poverty rates when cost of living and proportionality is figured in.

    http://www.costoflivingbystat...

    So, I would rather live in a really "poor" state with a low cost of living than a less "poor" state with a high cost of living.
  • jgh57 Z 2012/05/12 03:26:36
    jgh57
    +1
    Just ain't so. I moved from Mississippi to Washington. There really is just not that much difference in cost of living but my income is way more.
  • Z jgh57 2012/05/12 04:48:41
    Z
    I am going to go with statistics, not personal experience which varies significantly.
  • Metaldane Z 2012/05/13 21:40:37
    Metaldane
    +1
    Actually I'm also from Washington and I moved down south for a year back when I was in highschool it's true I'm a 19 year old walmart worker paying for college and I've still saved up 12,000 dollars and I do pay rent and other bills.
  • flaca BN-0 Z 2012/05/14 00:37:15
    flaca BN-0
    those wealth numbers are adjusted for those things.
  • Z flaca BN-0 2012/05/14 02:12:13
    Z
    Actually, if you read the original report that those numbers came from, you would know that they weren't.
  • DJPanicDC 2012/05/12 02:57:28
    DJPanicDC
    +3
    They are also less educated, more prejudiced, and cling to the "gods, Guns, and Gays" line of voting
    Read Whats a Matter with Kanssas
  • Z DJPanicDC 2012/05/12 02:58:09
    Z
    Read a book that isn't completely inaccurate.
  • DJPanicDC Z 2012/05/12 03:04:59
    DJPanicDC
    +1
    and the inaccuracies are......
  • Z DJPanicDC 2012/05/12 11:16:08
    Z
    All of it. The book is almost entirely wrong. I live in Missouri, and spent much of my life in Kansas. There is more wrong than there is right in that book by about a 10 to 1 margin.
  • VICTORIA 2012/05/12 02:40:16
    VICTORIA
    +3
    Because their policies create poverty.
  • R. 2012/05/12 02:27:09
    R.
    +2
    Because they live on what they make, not what they are given .
  • DJPanicDC R. 2012/05/12 02:58:01
    DJPanicDC
    +2
    lol look into it Red States recieve the MOST fedral money
  • R. DJPanicDC 2012/05/12 10:47:00
    R.
    Government monies are based on per person so quite naturally less populated
    rural areas would receive more per person. This is also straight monies. See how
    many high rises are built and paid for ,with tax dollars, in Iowa or Nebraska. You are
    losing context when you merely state these numbers without adding up the
    total dollars spent including education, medicare,medicaid, unemployment etc...
  • DJPanicDC R. 2012/05/12 10:54:35
    DJPanicDC
    +1
    don't forget the agro subsidies in that math
  • R. DJPanicDC 2012/05/13 01:28:11
    R.
    Maybe you would like to do a dollar for dollar comparison of
    those subsidies versus say medicaid in a blue state or the
    amount paid for unemployment benefits in a large blue metro
    area. Come to think of it , you probably would not want to.
  • VoteOut 2012/05/12 02:04:32
    VoteOut
    +1
    Because the democrats keep stealing all the money for their own states and don't believe in sharing
  • flaca BN-0 VoteOut 2012/05/14 00:38:49
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    I thought the feds gave more money to those states than they take in.
  • VoteOut flaca BN-0 2012/05/15 23:34:08
    VoteOut
    thats funny where do the feds get the money but from the people of the states
  • Charge 2012/05/12 01:44:57
    Charge
    Guess the 1% are really Progressive Liberals, as a matter of fact there are only 3 States in 25 to 50 that are Democratic.... hmmmm, Maybe the real middle class are Conservatives....
    WOW, the Progressive Liberals are lying to us and THEY are the real 1%.
    Now why are they poor, well after trusting the Democrats they were driven into poverty and now look to the Conservatives to help create jobs; or maybe it's their Conservative family values that Liberals hate; one thing for sure they won't deal with Liberal BS.
  • Metaldane 2012/05/12 01:34:43
    Metaldane
    +3
    Their economic policies and low educational levels.
  • Linnster 2012/05/12 01:29:36
    Linnster
    +3
    Aren't people in those states also less educated? I'm pretty sure lack of education and income level go hand in hand.
  • flaca BN-0 Linnster 2012/05/12 01:37:21
    flaca BN-0
    +2
    less education: more malliable to crap it seems
  • Linnster flaca BN-0 2012/05/12 01:41:02
    Linnster
    Right.
  • VoteOut flaca BN-0 2012/05/12 02:14:40
    VoteOut
    +2
    How do you quantify "educated" because one does not need degrees to be educated and I have not been to impressed with high academia achievement levels of some as being all that intelligent. With level of educational material readily available for anyone with access to the internet on any and all subjects its shame on the individual if they are not educated. But education will only take you so far and I would put my money on the experienced person with a but of common sense over the highly educated any day
  • flaca BN-0 VoteOut 2012/05/14 00:39:32
    flaca BN-0
    +1
    are you assuming that education prevents you from being experienced?
  • VoteOut flaca BN-0 2012/05/15 23:34:55 (edited)
    VoteOut
    not at all, but all of life is a process of learning experiencing and expanding perception (the last of which is the purpose/evolution of life forms in general). There is no such thing as "educated" as in past tense.

    But I can tell you I know of heart surgeons that don't know how a ballcock in a toilet works nor how to repair it, so I would surely question them on doing a Mitral valve replacement or properly diagnosing a aortic stenosis. And I did not have to go to college for 12 years to be educated on either of them.
  • Bilingu... VoteOut 2012/11/12 03:08:05
    Bilingual required sucks
    +1
    You are actually comparing toilet repair, with open heart surgery? SERIOUSLY?
  • VoteOut Bilingu... 2012/11/13 13:04:45 (edited)
    VoteOut
    sure! you never changed a flapper value on a toilet? These days I believe open heart surgery is not so open and that they can replace a valve by going in through major arteries of the leg, kind of like snaking a drain with a camera.

News & Politics

2013/05/22 21:17:22

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals