Quantcast

Why are minority and guilty White liberals all about establishing socialism through intimidation via false racism charges and socialistic euphemisms such as "social justice?"

Conservative in California 2009/10/17 19:13:55
You!
Add Photos & Videos
Social Justice = Reparations = Affirmative Action = Quotas = Welfare = Obamacare = SOCIALISM. Liberals can use any euphemism they want, but at the end of the day, what they want is something simply given to them they they never earned and they do not deserve.

Why should minorities be entitled to something they did not earn?

Socialism is immoral because it kills motivation and it is oppressive as the government controls you no differently than slavery.

Applying the laws unequally based on race because one race was long ago discriminated by people no longer alive does not seem a valid way to bring about MLK Jr's dream of treating people based on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Seems to me that if you unequally apply the laws based on race, you will not drive society to becoming more equal and just, but simply more divisive and resentful of the races against each other.
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • PartysOver 2009/10/17 19:56:13
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    PartysOver
    +3
    No one should be entitled to something they did not earn. You work you're entitled to your pay or your UE Tax pays for Unemployment. You become disabled your disability tax payments entitle you to benefits. Your Social Security pays for retirement benefits and Medicare Tax for health care coverage.
    That is the way it was intended. The rest is privilege not a right.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Scandalf 2012/08/30 08:11:58
    Other...
    Scandalf
    Because dishonest people are among Liberals too.
  • The Electrician 2010/10/30 11:41:47
    Other...
    The Electrician
    +1
    Being Democratically minded, I also understand that Liberalism can be abused and is often exploited, more often by the Conservative minded.

    To better understand it, I'm posting the dictionary definition of both, "mindsets." This is not an opinion, it's a statement of facts. As Thomas Jefferson stated, "we find these truths, self evident."

    Conservative: reluctant to accept change: in favor of preserving the status quo and traditional values and customs, and against abrupt change. (basically greedy, selfish, self serving)

    Liberal:
    1. broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others

    2. progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual

    3. generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset

    4. generous in quantity: large in size or amount > a liberal helping

    5. not literal: not limited to the literal meaning in translation or interpretation > a liberal interpretation of the rules

    6. culturally oriented: concerned with general cultural matters and broadening of the mind rather than professional or technical study > a liberal education

    7. of political liberalism: relating to a p...




    Being Democratically minded, I also understand that Liberalism can be abused and is often exploited, more often by the Conservative minded.

    To better understand it, I'm posting the dictionary definition of both, "mindsets." This is not an opinion, it's a statement of facts. As Thomas Jefferson stated, "we find these truths, self evident."

    Conservative: reluctant to accept change: in favor of preserving the status quo and traditional values and customs, and against abrupt change. (basically greedy, selfish, self serving)

    Liberal:
    1. broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others

    2. progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual

    3. generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset

    4. generous in quantity: large in size or amount > a liberal helping

    5. not literal: not limited to the literal meaning in translation or interpretation > a liberal interpretation of the rules

    6. culturally oriented: concerned with general cultural matters and broadening of the mind rather than professional or technical study > a liberal education

    7. of political liberalism: relating to a political ideology of liberalism
    liberal person: somebody who favors tolerance or open-mindedness

    Also: A generous person.

    I find it difficult to dispute this, So yes, I'm Liberal.
    (more)
  • Conserv... The Ele... 2010/10/31 01:41:38
    Conservative in California
    there is nothing liberal about a Progressive Statist. They are the antithesis of freedom, liberty, and choice.
  • The Ele... Conserv... 2010/10/31 17:36:55
    The Electrician
    +1
    That is one twisted opinion.
  • Wayne 2009/10/19 05:20:21
    Other...
    Wayne
    +1
    Are you kidding? Liberals typically can't see past the end of their nose!
  • The Frog Prince 2009/10/18 12:20:37
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    The Frog Prince
    +1
    They like the idea of putting the paw out and having the basket filled without having to toil. That's Lalaland stuff though and hasn't ever worked for long.
  • Bear 2009/10/18 08:20:22
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    Bear
    +1
    That's pretty much it. They hold US to standards human beings cannot live up to, while they HAVE NO STANDARDS.
    It's all in here... As usual...

    america plan liberals pretty hold standards human beings live standards
  • goatman112003 2009/10/18 00:37:58
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    goatman112003
    +2
    Socialism at its core was a synthesis of marxism without the violence but with the control of a communist state. Its religion is that of secular humanism, the same as the marxists The control is to make the individual dependent to the state and subservient to the state. To give him a fish everyday instead of teaching him to fish. It is a sucker of human spirit and dignity from man.
  • Asher 2009/10/17 23:09:12
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    Asher
  • Conserv... Asher 2009/10/17 23:14:05
    Conservative in California
    It's as if one day the communists/socialists/liberals got together and said, "You know...Americans really don't like oppressive communism. They even fought a Cold War for 45 years that Reagan helped win at the end to defeat the evils of communism. How can we do an end run around the American People to bring about a complete redistribution of wealth in America?............I got it! Let's accuse anyone who disagrees with our euphemisms of communism of being racists. That will get what we want, because nobody wants to be called a racist."
  • Asher Conserv... 2009/10/17 23:27:08
    Asher
    +2
    pretty much. a "hail mary" to try and shut down opposition.
    like i said in previous posts....i got a bad feeling they are not going to stop and this is going to get really ugly.
  • Conserv... Asher 2009/10/17 23:30:44
    Conservative in California
    +2
    Communists set out at the turn of the century to make the world into a worldwide communist brotherhood. Worked in Russia in 1917, but that experiment failed miserably and resulted in 50 million deaths at the hands of Stalin. Chairman Mao tried the same experiment in China in 1949. 80 million deaths later, that system failed. Pol Pot tried the Communist experiment, and 3 million deaths later, that experiment failed. Castro tried that experiment, and untold thousands have been tortured, killed, imprisoned, or disappeared forever.
  • Asher Conserv... 2009/10/17 23:36:07
    Asher
    +1
    exactly. i can only speak for me but as the saying goes...
    better to die on your feet than live on your knees...
  • Bear Asher 2009/10/18 08:33:28
    Bear
    +1
    It looks like we're going to have to physically kick their asses before they get too strong. Ever notice, the loonies go on shooting sprees, then kill themselves, but NEVER EVER do they shoot those that REALLY NEED SHOOTING?

    Can you say MKULTRA? How about BLUEBIRD? How about the MONTAUK project? Just for starters.
  • Asher Bear 2009/10/18 13:05:16
    Asher
    +1
    i dont know whats going to happen. but ill fight before i let some person/government take my freedom...
  • Conserv... Asher 2009/10/22 08:21:49
    Conservative in California
    won't we all...
  • Bear Conserv... 2009/10/18 08:21:50
    Bear
    +1
    Research Antonio Gramsci.
  • TheGroundsquirrel 2009/10/17 22:52:59
    Other...
    TheGroundsquirrel
    +1
    Because they are losing their collective asses at Bingo and the Lottery.
  • Peaches 2009/10/17 21:20:51
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    Peaches
    +2
    The truth is a pesky inconvenience for ALL liberals.
  • Prairie Wind 2009/10/17 21:09:17 (edited)
    Other...
    Prairie Wind
    +2
    The behavior is indicative of those accustomed for others assuming what responsibilies as their own for making a living, rather than continually expecting to be "spoon fed".
  • Zuggi 2009/10/17 20:05:52
    Other...
    Zuggi
    I think this question is gibberish.
  • Conserv... Zuggi 2009/10/17 23:03:43
    Conservative in California
    +1
    Have you ever thought any of my questions weren't gibberish?
  • Zuggi Conserv... 2009/10/18 00:40:58
    Zuggi
    A few times.
  • Conserv... Zuggi 2009/10/18 01:36:56
    Conservative in California
    +1
    well, those few times you were correct, and this time you happen to be wrong.
  • PartysOver 2009/10/17 19:56:13
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    PartysOver
    +3
    No one should be entitled to something they did not earn. You work you're entitled to your pay or your UE Tax pays for Unemployment. You become disabled your disability tax payments entitle you to benefits. Your Social Security pays for retirement benefits and Medicare Tax for health care coverage.
    That is the way it was intended. The rest is privilege not a right.
  • OLD CRACKER 2009/10/17 19:44:05
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    OLD CRACKER
    +3
    THEY ARE THE SOMETHING FOR NOTHING GENERATION, THE WELFARE QUEENS, DOPE SMOKING CRIMINALS, ILLEGAL ALIENS, GANGS, LIBERAL, SOCIALIST, ELITEST, RACIST POLITICIANS, YOUNG BRAINWASHED FOOLS AND ALL THE OTHER GIVE ME ME SOMETHING FOR NOTHING, KEEP POWER AT ANY COST PARASITE'S THAT NOW CONTROL THE WHITE HOUSE AND CONGRESS. A VILE POX BE UPON ALL WHO HELP OBAMA DO HIS EVIL WORK.
  • Peaches OLD CRA... 2009/10/17 21:24:44 (edited)
    Peaches
    +2
    We can HOPE for this kind of CHANGE--the latter part of your statement. It would be a blessing from God. That would bring true hope that America will live on, would regain some of our past greatness, and a renewed reverance for the laws of God.
  • bonobo11 2009/10/17 19:20:24
    Other...
    bonobo11
    wouldn´t know about it,try http://www.sodahead.com/enter...
  • Conservative in California 2009/10/17 19:14:19
    By any dishonest means necessary to bring about establishing socialism in Ame...
    Conservative in California
    +3
    Social Justice = Reparations = Affirmative Action = Quotas = Welfare = Obamacare = SOCIALISM. Liberals can use any euphemism they want, but at the end of the day, what they want is something simply given to them they they never earned and they do not deserve.

    Why should minorities be entitled to something they did not earn?

    Socialism is immoral because it kills motivation and it is oppressive as the government controls you no differently than slavery.

    Applying the laws unequally based on race because one race was long ago discriminated by people no longer alive does not seem a valid way to bring about MLK Jr's dream of treating people based on the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Seems to me that if you unequally apply the laws based on race, you will not drive society to becoming more equal and just, but simply more divisive and resentful of the races against each other.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

News & Politics

2014/07/23 16:09:24

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals