Quantcast

Why an Income Tax is Not Necessary to Fund the U.S. Government

POODYLOU ☮ R P ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/01/22 19:44:06

President's Private Sector Survey On Cost Control
A Report to The President (Reagan)

January 15, 1984. Available from the Congressional Research Service.
The excerpt below can be found on page 12.

  • "Importantly, any meaningful increases in taxes from personal income would have to come from lower and middle income families, as 90% of all personal taxable income is generated below the taxable income level of $35,000.

  • Further, there isn't much more that can be extracted from high income brackets. If the
    Government took 100% of all taxable income beyond the $75,000 tax bracket not already taxed, it would get only $17 billion, and this confiscation, which would destroy productive enterprise, would only be sufficient to run the Government for several days.

  • Resistance to additional income taxes would be even more widespread if people were aware that:

  • With two-thirds of everyone's personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Government contributions to transfer payments.

  • In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their government."

So what we have is a central bank issuing worthless paper "money" that controls our economy, our lives and our future. This private banking cartel was unconstitutionally granted this power by a devious, scheming group of senators back in 1913. In essence what they did was place the American people into indentured servitude by forcing The People to pay usury on worthless fiat currency (paper money created out of nothing), not to fund the government, but to enrich the bankers and fund wars in which America should never be involved. This system exists not to fund the government, but to allow the U.S. Congress carte blanche power to continue funding unconstitutional agencies and programs by providing them with a bottomless source of worthless ink.

Read More: http://www.devvy.com/notax.html

You!
Add Photos & Videos

Top Opinion

  • Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮ 2012/01/22 21:43:36
    Magnus ☮ RP ☮ 2012 ☮
    +4
    Income Tax began in 1913 along with and because of the take-over of the so-called 'federal' reserve banking cartel (privately owned, by the way). Income Tax goes directly to it. Prior to 1913, there was absolutely no Income Tax and we were just fine! End the FED.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Ambassa... clasact 2012/01/24 03:53:25
    Ambassador II
    This current Administration has sought to reverse the power and tide of this travesty, only to face the unrelenting opposition of the Republican Party and the entrenched Congress and lobbyists. Still, they have managed to send more than 100 robbers from Wall Street to jail, have indictments outstanding for at least 100 more, and have
    passed some significant control legislation to protect the population. Newt and Mitten both promise to remove all these controls the first day they are in office. Does that tell
    a story that should be headlines?
  • clasact Ambassa... 2012/01/24 11:15:00
    clasact
    now some of that I did not know but the part about the Rep I did .The whole thing started under a Rep and was advenced through Rep.Most people are so fed up with the slow job growth they dont look at things like that and will try to put one of those fools in office and then we will be right back where this whole mess started
  • Ambassa... clasact 2012/01/24 22:38:31 (edited)
    Ambassador II
    +1
    You are on to the trail of the problems. Jobs become available when the middle class consumer has money in his pocket and goes looking for a new refrigerator or auto, some clothes for the kids, or takes a vacation to Disney World. The false story of "Reaganomics" and the "trickle down" myth has absolutely proven that giving or leaving more money in the hands of a select few Aristocrats and corporations does absolutely nothing for employment, except, perhaps, Tiffany's in New York, Neiman Marcus, and a couple of yacht makers in Brazil.
  • clasact Ambassa... 2012/01/25 01:14:37
    clasact
    +1
    I have never agreed with Reagenomics and never will.When people who have money get more money they sure dont use it to create jobs and help the working class and anyone who think so is an idiot.It funny the wealthy are down to i belive less then17% tax but for a non married working person its around 30% or more when you add state tax also
  • Ambassa... clasact 2012/01/25 01:21:29
    Ambassador II
    +1
    Indeed, the owners of the Plantation do take advantage of the field workers, don't they?
  • Stan Kapusta 2012/01/22 20:32:14
    Stan Kapusta
    +3
    Our fate was sealed when Woodrow Wilson sold America. People now have the correct information. I won't see it. But the next 30 to 40 years the 3 card monty will stop. When people die the govenment won't be able to tax the average persons assets back.
  • Autarchic Stan Ka... 2012/01/22 20:58:02

News & Politics

2013/05/19 02:24:23

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals