When the Academy announced the latest crop of Oscar nominees Thursday morning, they left out some pretty famous — and deserving — folks. They also anointed a movie that wasn’t expected to get major Oscar attention. We asked Rolling Stone film critic Peter Travers and New York Times film critic A.O. Scott to run down who got snubbed and which nominees surprised them:
1. SNUB: Kathryn Bigelow. Travers called Bigelow’s lack of a best director nomination for “Zero Dark Thirty” the Academy’s No. 1 snub. Bigelow was up for best director for 2009′s “The Hurt Locker” and became the first woman to ever win that Oscar. He’s calling sexism: “Do they think that because they gave it to her for ‘Hurt Locker, they don’t have to give another woman best director for another 100 years?”
Scott was similarly shocked: “That movie is such a piece of directing. It seemed like something I thought everyone could agree on.”
2. SNUB: Ben Affleck. The “Argo” director and star didn’t get recognized in the acting or directing categories, though, like Bigelow, his film is up for best picture and other awards. ”His was one of the most acclaimed directing jobs of the year,” Travers said. “It was a film that was intelligent, adult, and made money.”
Affleck’s talents may have rubbed the directors who choose the category’s nominees the wrong way. “Sometimes directors have a grudge against actors who direct,” Scott said.
3. SNUB: Quentin Tarantino. Another director who didn’t make the cut, though his movie did: Tarantino. “Django Unchained” is up for best picture and an acting award, but no dice for best director. “I think he’s a little scary for the Academy,” Scott said. “He’s sort of a maverick and a bit of a loose cannon. If you look at that nomination as the club of directors voting for who they like, they might not want him in that club.”
4. SNUB: Leonardo DiCaprio. The “Django” villain could’ve finally clinched an Oscar had he been up for best supporting actor, but the Academy left him out, instead nominating Christoph Waltz, DiCaprio’s lovable co-star. “If they were thinking of ratings, they probably should’ve nominated Leo,” Travers said. “But I think Christoph Waltz does have a better performance.”
5. SURPRISE: “Amour.” Though the French drama won the top trophy at the Cannes Film Festival this year, it wasn’t expected to get mainstream recognition. “Winning that prize usually means nothing,” in terms of Hollywood, Scott said. ”But this one, it’s really touched a chord. It’s a really tough movie. It’s very sad, it’s very emotional, but really, extraordinarily well made.”
Travers quipped that the film about two octogenarians might appeal to the Academy for other reasons. “If you consider that the average age of an Academy voter is 127,” he said, “they’re going to be really interested about a couple in their 80s dealing with death.”
I'm not sure if he'd have won had he been nominated, but I really thought they would give him a spot in the category. But how bad can I feel for someone who already has an Oscar (remember a little movie called "Good Will Hunting"...)?
Maggie Smith is a great actress. She allways comes across. However I think the biggest snub is Adam Sandler. This man has proven to us on several occaisions that not only is he one of the better directors and producers of our time but his acting abilities far surpass the likes of Lawrence Olivier, George Clooney,Kevin Spacey,Daniel Day Lewis, Morgan Freeman. Need I go on?
What about those performances in Happy Gilmore,Billy Madison, The Water Boy. Who can forget his performance in Jack and Jill. Pure Sundance and Cannes acting. When will they recognize his talents?
Not for the acting. He was not bad but I can see not academy award winning performance but Directing is a snub. Great movie and he deserves the nomination for it!
This was just an affirmation that the Oscar's reflect neither the caliber of performance nor the success of the film being recognized. I stopped watching such shows when the social content became more important than the quality and success of the film, the final nail in the coffin for the Academy Awards was when they snubbed the Harry Potter franchise !
No movie or series of movies was more universally beloved or financially successful nor were better performances by it's cast ignored by the Oscars. Those who nominate and vote for movies at Oscar time have disrespected and belittled those of us who pay to watch those movies and have insulted us for the last time. Since you don't care about the
movie going public's opinion when it's time to recognize the movie why should we watch?
Keep your elitist, socially correct, Liberal opinions of what a good movie is to yourself Oscar Mr.because the only true gauge of a great movie is box office sales and more times than not you have no idea!
What a miss on the voter's part. I didn't really care much for the movie but had anyone else been the director I really don't think it would have been any better than it is. I also think Hopper was snubbed for directing Les Mis, it was beautiful and at least deserved a nod.
Biggest snub ever.
What about those performances in Happy Gilmore,Billy Madison, The Water Boy. Who can forget his performance in Jack and Jill. Pure Sundance and Cannes acting. When will they recognize his talents?
1969 Best Actress -The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie
1978 Best Supporting Actress-California Suite
No movie or series of movies was more universally beloved or financially successful nor were better performances by it's cast ignored by the Oscars. Those who nominate and vote for movies at Oscar time have disrespected and belittled those of us who pay to watch those movies and have insulted us for the last time. Since you don't care about the
movie going public's opinion when it's time to recognize the movie why should we watch?
Keep your elitist, socially correct, Liberal opinions of what a good movie is to yourself Oscar Mr.because the only true gauge of a great movie is box office sales and more times than not you have no idea!