When liberals look at a crowd of people, they see blacks, whites, Hispanics, Orientals, men, women, rich, poor, gay, straight, union workers, old, young etc.
When Conservatives look at a crowd of people, they just see people.
Who is more racist, liberals or conservatives?
Foxhound BN0
2012/06/04 13:04:22
|
|
|||||
|
254 votes
|
|
53% | ||
|
128 votes
|
|
27% | ||
|
95 votes
|
|
20% | ||
Please rave this post if you like it.
Every one of them is a lunatic and each is on drugs? Eldridge Cleaver too? When was the last time we heard his name mentioned? He is now a conservative Republican, and I don't think he is on drugs. Why is Jackson's name mentioned twice, or who is Jackson Lee? Do we really think Jeremiah Wright and Maxine Waters are druggies?
As I said, if any of this can be verified, you would have quite a scoop.
The others object to displays of overt racism. How is that racism?
An unarmed black teen was shot and killed by a man with a history of violent behavior, and the perpetrator was allowed to walk free with his gun, which was not impounded as evidence or analyzed properly by a crime lab. That in itself is enough information to arouse people's curiosity.
Don't know how much coverage this story has had in your area,
but, if it has, here's a new look at it.
For those of us who thought we were well informed and weren't....
it's quite the reality check.
That old adage applies here. . .
"there are two sides to every story" . . .
we don't always get real truth from liberal media.
One of my favorite rants...the liberal controlled media...television news...newspapers...magazines... all continue
to show 12 year old Trayvon...NOT 17 year old Trayvon.
They continue to show the 5 year old picture
BECAUSE it helps to cement in your mind
the little, cute, hoodie-wearing youngster who was
stalked by a "monster".
In reality.."little Trayvon"...at the time of his death...
stood almost 6'2" tall...weighed 175 muscular pounds...
had numerous run ins with authorities (both at school and local police)...
had been stopped and almost arrested two days before his death for
smacking a bus driver in the face,
because the driver refused to let him ride for free.
He was released because the driver was told not to press charges
by the bus company and to continue on his route.
When "little Trayvon" was suspended at school,
it was not only because he tried to bring a little marijuana in with him...
he was...
Don't know how much coverage this story has had in your area,
but, if it has, here's a new look at it.
For those of us who thought we were well informed and weren't....
it's quite the reality check.
That old adage applies here. . .
"there are two sides to every story" . . .
we don't always get real truth from liberal media.
One of my favorite rants...the liberal controlled media...television news...newspapers...magazines... all continue
to show 12 year old Trayvon...NOT 17 year old Trayvon.
They continue to show the 5 year old picture
BECAUSE it helps to cement in your mind
the little, cute, hoodie-wearing youngster who was
stalked by a "monster".
In reality.."little Trayvon"...at the time of his death...
stood almost 6'2" tall...weighed 175 muscular pounds...
had numerous run ins with authorities (both at school and local police)...
had been stopped and almost arrested two days before his death for
smacking a bus driver in the face,
because the driver refused to let him ride for free.
He was released because the driver was told not to press charges
by the bus company and to continue on his route.
When "little Trayvon" was suspended at school,
it was not only because he tried to bring a little marijuana in with him...
he was in possession of wedding rings and other jewelry,
watches, etc, that he said he "found" along with a large screwdriver,
while on the way to school that day.
The jewelry was turned over to the Police by the school.
I am not trying to say this was a good shooting...
I am not trying to say this kid deserved to die...
I am saying...
the media in the USA is controlled by liberals who twist and distort what you see
and hear in order for you to see things their way.
Not a single paper has printed RECENT photos of this kid...
because...
it would not keep your interest in this case...
Not a single paper will admit that this kid was a marijuana dealer...
his friends on facebook all say he had the "best plants"...
not a single paper will show you any of his recent photos
where he shows off a mouthful of gold teeth....
all of his tattoos...
not a single paper will tell the news like it really is....
and NOT how they want you to think it is.
I take issue with most of your charges, which were made up by the RW blogs in order to make Trayvon look evil and Zimmerman look like some kind of savior.
Nothing of what you say––even the made-up parts––give a reason why Trayvon Martin deserved to die that night at the hands of a man with his trusty gun, who appeared to be spoiling for a fight, a man with a history of violent behavior.
We don't know what was said between them when they met, but the end result was an unarmed teen being shot to death by a man who had a violent past and who could have avoided the confrontation by remaining in his vehicle as instructed.
Martin attacked Zimmerman? What did he do, look for the nearest motorist and drag the man out of his vehicle? You said Zimmerman was no longer following the boy. I suppose Trayvon could have run from him, but he chose to stand his ground and fight out of self defense.
You make it sound as if Trayon encountered Zimmerman, who was simply walking along and minding his own business, then decided to pause long enough to beat him up, despite all evidence to the contrary.
I know what has been reported by media.
I will say you have a different take on the case, far more than has been reported by the media.
That is as much as I am aware of that has been substantiated. I also know that it was found on Martins twitter account that he was selling drugs and had requests made on his account to provide drugs...I read it myself.
Several of the "witnesses" have since recanted their stories, and some have admitted they saw nothing at all.
What does Trayvon's Twitter account have to do with him trying to walk home after purchasing Skittles and tea at a local store? Was he selling drugs on his way home? That is entirely irrelevant, and he was never convicted of a drug violation.
Zimmerman was ordered back to jail because he was exposed as a liar, which will probably be noted if he takes the witness stand.
Nice to see you again, Sunshine.
thanks J.. nice to see you too.
Zimmerman suffered head injury.
Many people were swayed by this picture where little Trayvon is shown as a young schoolboy he looked years earlier.
The pictures of Zimmerman's injuries were taken a few days after the murder by the family doctor, who has access to Photoshop. The tape of Zimmerman being taken in for questioning the night of the murder doesn't show any of those injuries. How do you explain the discrepancy?
Those "witnesses" have mostly recanted their stories since then, as they have been interviewed by the prosecutor's office. It turns out they made it up the part about Trayvon attacking Zimmerman.
It looks like jail for George.
There is no evidence Trayvon attacked Zimmerman. The witnesses who said so have since recanted their stories. He was minding his own business, walking home with his iced tea and Skittles, and Zimmerman followed him because he "looked suspicious," probably by being black and wearing a hoodie. He followed him first in his vehicle, then on foot, and finally confronted him, all against instructions from the police dispatcher.
What happened after that is not clear, but Zimmerman initiated the incident and then murdered the boy. This much is also known: there would have been no incident and no murder if Zimmerman had followed instructions. He does not get to claim self defense.
He has no credibility after lying in court, so he will remain in jail. He needs to get used to living behind bars.
Based on the witness accounts and media reports Martin attacked Zimmerman. He had no choice but to shoot. I don't doubt that tremendous pressure is put on witnesses to adjust their testimony in order to convict Zimmerman.
I am trying to imagine being a member of the jury and hearing this rationale for the claim of self defense. I would be incredulous to say the least. After hearing about how he lied under oath about his finances, and about how he kept a second passport for future use, I would have little faith in anything Zimmerman said.
None of the "witnesses" will be on the witness stand during the murder trial, since they recanted their stories and admitted they made up the part about Trayvon attacking Zimmerman.
I wonder if George looks good in stripes.
This recantation proves one thing, there are forces at work that will stop at nothing to convict the poor guy.
If I were jury I would find Zimmerman not guilty.
The man had the right to defend himself. Had that right because now the political forces are at work to deny him that right.
The poor guy? Give me a break. He stalked an unarmed teen and then he murdered him. If he had stayed away as he was instructed, there would have been no incident. That is how it will look to the jury. George is as good as convicted, and the Stand Your Ground statute will soon be repealed by the state legislature.
Don't worry, he won't get life. He will get somewhere near the minimum, and serve one-third of that before he is paroled. He won't ever again be permitted to own a gun. I call that a final measure of justice.
The statute that allowed Zimmerman to save his life is indeed under attack and that is the liberal agenda, so that people are unable to defend themselves against much stronger thugs.
In my judgment Zimmerman does not deserve even one day in jail and the police initially agreed with that. Now the game of railroading began for clearly political reasons that have nothing to do with justice.
This game would not be played by the libs if Zimmerman was black. The case would simply become another line in crime statistics and quickly forgotten. It is all about race for the libs.
The police initially wanted to charge Zimmerman, but the DA told them to back off. That DA has been taken off the case, and could lose his job, with several other questionable decisions on his record. Zimmerman's father is known to have contacted him.
You don't know much about this prosecutor. She is known for being tough but fair. She has no political ambitions, and she will prosecute this case as it should be. Remember, she was appointed by Governor Rick Scott, hardly a leftist.
So you admit your motivation is about race.
The ugly truth is that black racists are screaming for George Zimmerman's head, threatening riots and civil unrest , implying all the casualties that will result if they don't get their "justice." The white libs as usual side with them. If Zimmerman was black they would not even bat an eye.
This picture was a racist propaganda as was the edited version of the call Zimmerman made to the police. It had biased many people against Zimmerman. The case is also used by liberal racists to repeal the law that allow people to defend themselves.
This sounds like an effort to railroad Zimmerman. Notice when he says "all key witnesses that they thought were good for Zimmerman" changed their stories. If I were defense lawyer I might call them as hostile witnesses and pick them apart at the stand then file perjury charges.
I am sure the black racist groups and the peer pressure motivated their recantations, they just want to see the "white boy" go down. My guess is, so do you.
You have no idea what caused them to recant. You are guessing, and I believe you are wrong.
Go to 2 min 43 secs into the video.
The NBC edited the audio to make the call sound like Zimmerman followed Martin because he is black.
Earlier in the video are shown all the racists groups who go after Zimmerman because he is white and dared to defend himself.
OK, I had a nice chuckle. Can we now get serious?
Zimmerman was released the night of the murder, and was allowed to keep his gun. A murder weapon which should have been impounded and examined by a crime lab was still in the possession of the murderer.
What is your stake in this? Why do you blindly support a murderer who has already lied under oath. How can anyone believe anything he says.
George should look good on a chain gang. He is going to the joint.
I think, that you know all that but for some reason you want Zimmerman in jail.
The police did a poor job of investigating this one, but they were told by the DA to back off of it. He is the one who is under suspension and could lose his job for incompetence.
You are not for justice. You are for allowing a murderer to walk free because, after all, he only shot a black kid who was "acting suspicious." Why not allow the system of jurisprudence to take its course?
You are still guessing about why the supposed witnesses recanted. You don't know anything about the so-called "neighborhood black racists."
Your video is edited by Fox and features Sean Hannity, which automatically makes it suspicious.
I don't care if you trust Hannity or not as long as he is presenting the the real news. I have no reason to trust NBC with their editorial shenanigans.
As for the black racists;... here they are from the neighborhood and out of town.
So now you are attacking me personally? You have run out of arguments, so you must turn to personal attacks?
Let us be clear on what racism is. Racism is slavery, Jim Crow, whippings, lynchings, gang rapes, torture, deprivation of equal opportunities in voting, housing, employment, facilities, etc, etc. You seem to think anyone objecting to displays of racism is himself a racist. Absolute rubbish.
Every time I see someone who has been subjected to the worst excesses of slavery referred to as a racist, I can only laugh at such ignorance.
Example #1
"What is your stake in this? Why do you blindly support a murderer who has already lied under oath."
In your question you make these judgments;
1. You assume that I have stake in the case and merely ask the question rhetorically then proceed to
2. claim that I support a murderer. The claim is baseless since Zimmerman has not been found guilty of murder.
Example #2
"You are not for justice. You are for allowing a murderer to walk free because, after all, he only shot a black kid who was "acting suspicious."
Of course I am for justice. Zimmerman is already judged by the racist mobs and liberal media guilty and I don't think that is fair.
Those were your statements.
I had not attacked you but merely asked this question;
"Why are trying so hard to prove that you are not a racist?"
This is not by any means a claim about you or an attack while your claims are personal attacks. I chose to ignore them at the time but you are forcing me to bring them up.