When liberals look at a crowd of people, they see blacks, whites, Hispanics, Orientals, men, women, rich, poor, gay, straight, union workers, old, young etc.
When Conservatives look at a crowd of people, they just see people.
Who is more racist, liberals or conservatives?
ServantOfAllah
2012/06/04 13:04:22
|
|
|||||
|
247 votes
|
|
53% | ||
|
125 votes
|
|
27% | ||
|
93 votes
|
|
20% | ||
Please rave this post if you like it.
Black racists? "Why are trying so hard to prove that you are not a racist?" Why are you so determined to inject race into a simple murder case? Yes, Trayvon was black and Zimmerman is white, and it would be easy to imagine his motive was racial at least in part, and it is true that he was heard referring to Trayvon as a "coon," but we don't really know what was in his heart.
I am trying to say we should allow the case to work its way through the court system. At this point it doesn't look good for Zimmerman, due to forensic evidence and the lack of a credible witness to support his contention that he fired in self defense.
I am not going to scroll back to find more of your judgments, because I have better things to do. You may acquit Zimmerman and his wife without having seen any ofr the evidence at the prosecutor's disposal, but the rest of us will wait and see what happens.
As for your question of "how dare you," I will take that with a grain of salt. Your sudden indignation does not work, and this is a forum for opinions, and I will express mine as I see fit. No one is suggesting you do otherwise.
In my opinion Zimmerman is being railroaded and they are going after his family and particularly his wife. It is interesting how witnesses are being tampered with, lawyers are quitting for some reason and judges resigning. It is highly unusual for that much to go on in a relatively simple case unless of course political pressure is used to manipulate the case. In a hind sight, it would have been better for Zimmerman if he was arrested, charged, and had a day in court. Based on initial testimony from eyewitnesses and the police records he would have been acquitted.
Do you know how long ago slavery was and how long ago it has ended? Al Sharpton and all other racists did not suffer slavery but in a way they benefit from it. Who would have ever heard of any of them if it was not for slavery?
Each time they have an opportunity to enrich themselves by bringing it up, they do.
The Martin - Zimmerman case has nothing to do with slavery but everything with the right of self defense.
The racists want Zimmerman's head simply because he dared to use the gun in self defense against black attacker.
Or are you going to claim that white or hispanic man just should let himself be beat up or killed because the assailant is black? That is racism. I could also say it is a form of slavery where certain people simply must submit and take it.
Martin made a choice and paid for it, he did not have to submit, he could have walked away but chose not to.
That is racism. It is not a man like Al Sharpton or Jessie Jackson protesting racism that still exists in this country. I am sure you would have labeled Martin Luther King Jr. a racist, the way you throw the word around.
As long as you throw that word around, you will have little credibility and even less respect. You shouldn't use words you don't understand.
The Trayvon Martin case was one of second-degree murder, and it now includes perjury by both Zimmerman and his wife. The self defense claim looks very weak now.
The Tawana Brawley case still embarrasses Al Sharpton. He was a relatively young man who allowed himself to be taken in by a tale of cruelty, which we all later found out was a hoax. It was perpetrated by her, not by him.
Maybe the Tawana Brawley hoax embarrasses Sharpton maybe not. Perhaps he is embarrassed because he and little Tawana got caught making the whole story up. Maybe you are right and he was just young an naive activist wanting to make the name for himself so he was willing to believe her. Be that as it may, the bottom line is he uses his public persona status from that hoax to benefit himself and to advance his idea of racial justice.
They stand behind pulpits in church; and run the country.......anyone can be a racist.....but according to MSM; it's Conservatives...that should tell you something there who really is...I think they protest too loudly...
less conservàtive. I bocked and reported.
Do you really think Sarah Palin is still relevant to today's dialogue? I can't imagine why anyone would resent you for liking someone, unless they have other problems.