Who do you think won Thursday night’s GOP debate?
Fox Report with Shepard Smith
2011/09/23 11:58:31
|
|
|||||
|
198 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
427 votes
|
|
11% | |||
|
55 votes
|
|
1% | |||
|
2,183 votes
|
|
55% | |||
|
191 votes
|
|
5% | |||
|
82 votes
|
|
2% | |||
|
687 votes
|
|
17% | |||
|
18 votes
|
|
0% | |||
|
146 votes
|
|
4% | |||
Top Opinion
-
Ron Paul
+13Paul, Johnson, and Cain were all great. I enjoyed Huntsman, Gingrich, and Bachmann too, but in terms of not only who can win against Obama (polls have Paul neck-and-neck with him), but who can best reverse the bad policies of Obama and previous Presidents, I'm going with Ron Paul.
I have enjoyed your conversation with Gracie. Both make good points. But, like you, I am totally tired of our involvement is everybody else's business.
No one can stop capitalism. Russia tried and fueled a huge underground mafia to supply the demands of the people. Capitalism is a force of nature. We need realistic rules to corral it.
• Capital as such is not evil; it is its wrong use that is evil. Capital in some form or other will always be needed. ~Mohandas Gandhi
...For those who have been tricked into blaming capitalism for all our woes: Capitalism is Not Evil. The evil we are witnessing here results from CORPORATISM.
CORPORATISM is the CURRENT trend of our federal administration; BOTH PARTIES seem to be on board with that, and how!
People may get these terms confused today, in part because of the intentionally deceptive recent catch phrase often used as a euphemism for corporatism: "crony capitalism". The use of the term "crony capitalism" serves both to vilify free market capitalism and at the same time distract us from the real evil of corporatism in our midst.
CORPORATISM is NOT capitalism and NOT socialism. (Some like to pretend they are practicing socialism: they aren't. And the very idea that they would promote the already known moral brier patch of socialism, as a dubious plant over the quicksand of corporatism, just illustrates how much more evil corporatism truly is.)
WATCH OUT, people!-- While socialism, in national practice, has always led to moral corruption-- (not so in the case of capitalism); CORPORATISM is INTRINSICALLY EVIL and is t...
• Capital as such is not evil; it is its wrong use that is evil. Capital in some form or other will always be needed. ~Mohandas Gandhi
...For those who have been tricked into blaming capitalism for all our woes: Capitalism is Not Evil. The evil we are witnessing here results from CORPORATISM.
CORPORATISM is the CURRENT trend of our federal administration; BOTH PARTIES seem to be on board with that, and how!
People may get these terms confused today, in part because of the intentionally deceptive recent catch phrase often used as a euphemism for corporatism: "crony capitalism". The use of the term "crony capitalism" serves both to vilify free market capitalism and at the same time distract us from the real evil of corporatism in our midst.
CORPORATISM is NOT capitalism and NOT socialism. (Some like to pretend they are practicing socialism: they aren't. And the very idea that they would promote the already known moral brier patch of socialism, as a dubious plant over the quicksand of corporatism, just illustrates how much more evil corporatism truly is.)
WATCH OUT, people!-- While socialism, in national practice, has always led to moral corruption-- (not so in the case of capitalism); CORPORATISM is INTRINSICALLY EVIL and is the shortest known way the 9th Circle of Hell !
I guess I should make a separate post now somewhere to clarify the definitions of these terms...BUT RON PAUL HAS TALKED A LOT ABOUT THE EVILS OF CORPORATISM: http://ronpaulquotes.com/conc...
Example= I have $10 in each hand. I give one to a family of four making 19-30 grand a year. I give the other to a family of four with an income of 100 grand +. Face it- in this economy, who is it going to mean more to?
Obviously we will need to wait and see...but the Rasmussen polls you mention have diverged significantly from other national polls. Rasmussen does not conduct polls near election day so it is impossible to fairly evaluate his polls. It has, however, been suggested the polls are biased. The most damning of this negative information is that Scott Rasmussen has been a paid consultant to Republican candidates. It has been suggested that the intention of his polls is to sway rather than measure public opinion.
And did this "damning" information come from an unbiased source?
I don't really pay attention to public polling, but I am curious as to who "damns" vs. who "praises" such polling and who flip-flops with those descriptions depending on poll results.
Providing polling services does not prove polling corruption.
Maybe it does to you, however, since you are the one who always claims to have the "facts".
Again, I was just curious as to the dis-credibility of Rasmussen by unbiased sources.
But, if Rasmussen is paid to poll and it is made public record that they are paid to poll, they apparently have nothing to hide, and agree that people can make up their own minds as to what they want to believe.
For instance, you believe they are biased or corrupted -- Have at it.
And if anyone interested read your plethora of negativity toward Republicans and Bush vs. your plethora of positivity toward Democrats and Obama, it is not rocket science to see that you would be suspicious of Rasmussen.
If you can prove they provide corrupted polss I will be glad to agree with you.
But, you have only provided information that Rasmussen publicly provides for everyone.
Too bad you couldn't beat them to the punch with all that public "fact".
http://projects.publicintegri...
But if it is a link showing that Rasmussen provided polling to the Bush campaign, save your effort.
I have no problem with believing such.
I simply want to know of unbiased sources with evidence that any polling services were corrupted.