Who Do You Think Will Ultimately Win the 2012 Election?

by SodaHead Politics Posted 2012/06/26 22:47:39

Related Topics: 2012 Election, Mitt Romney, Obama, Barack Obama, Polls, Election, Poll, Survey, Romney, Mitt, Image, This Week, Images, Questions, 2012

Read More

1,140 votes
Read all 628 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	Mitt Romney	441 votes	39%
	Barack Obama	642 votes	56%
	Other	57 votes	5%

We know you want to make your opinion count -- especially during the time of a serious election. So, every week, SodaHead will host a handful of up-to-date polls having to do with the upcoming 2012 election.

Vote on this week's election questions below and make sure to come back every Tuesday to see how everyone voted -- and to receive a new batch of questions worth pondering. It's a great time to have an opinion. So, dive right in to our 2012 Election poll.

+13

Add a comment above

mrdog 2012/06/27 05:30:27

Mitt Romney

+14
O is a loser...One and Done...bark
>> See Replies

More polls by SodaHead Politics

ray to richwright 2012/07/17 04:51:14

No, but if you watch it then it must not be good.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 14:23:33

You must be home schooled?

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/17 15:41:56

No, and how is that even an insult?

reply
TrudyGirl to ray 2012/07/21 21:50:33

I have one thing to say to you ...READ! If you took the time to do that you might realize how much he has done. If you have children and they have a chronic illness that could cause them to reach a policy maximum by the time they are five years old and then it runs out with no chance of any other coverage you might just appreciate that health care. If you had a chronic disease that would make coverage impossible or not financially feasible you might just appreciate that health care. Try to be a little more compassionate and realize how badly this was needed to protect those who through no fault of their own are chronically ill.

reply
ray to TrudyGirl 2012/07/21 22:06:27 (edited)

Obama ruined the country and if you knew anything about politics you would know that.

Obamacare forces everyone to pay. What if you are having trouble paying the bills? Obamacare will force everyone to pay whether they like it or not. I will have to pay thousands if dollars a year tI not have the crappy health care and if I do have it then I will still pay and then not be treated when I get old.

Try to be more compassionate to those who cannot pay for Obamacare.If you have the crappy Heath care then you pay. If you don't, then you still pay.

reply
TrudyGirl to ray 2012/07/22 06:00:33

and what if you're life or your child's life depends on medical you can't get. If you had read a bit further you might have seen that if you don't make enough to pay for insurance you will still have insurance, Karma is a bad thing and yours is not looking to comfortable.Look a bit further back than 2008 and you will find the cause of the dire situation this country was in when he took office.

You need to take a chill pill and resign yourself to 4 more years with Obama.

reply
ray to TrudyGirl 2012/07/22 16:17:41

And what if you don't have money? Oh right, Obamacare will bankrupt you. And if you do not have the crappy health care? You pay thousands a year in penalty taxes. My "karma" is looking gpod since I am saving people money they may or may not have.

This situation started in 2007-2008 but then it worsened with Obama. The debt rose by 5 trillion, the unemployment is still above 8%, and the credit is crap. The economy has shown 0 signs of improving thanks to Obama.

reply
TrudyGirl to ray 2012/07/23 14:27:57

Like all of the charmers in your group of very selfish people. It is all about you and your comfort level and the h___ with the rest of those people. The health care plan would have if left alone but your side of the fence. I am so far thrilled with what is happening and would only say to you to keep your noses out of the Presidency that your side did not win and will not win again because of the arrogance of your party. We could be in much better shape right now if W had not been president and your party would leave OUR President alone to do his job.

reply
ray to TrudyGirl 2012/07/23 15:23:35

Selfish? Oh, I am not selfish. Why? Because I want to help families who cannot pay for Obamacare. Why would someone not want insurance? Because they cannot pay. And what does Obamacare force you to do? Pay money. Even if you do not want to have Obamacare you are still going to be forced to have it and pay for it.

What has Obama done? Raise the debt by 5 trillion? Ignore the unemployment? Ruin the US credit? Create a tax disguised as crappy health care? Yep, Obama has done all of these things.

reply
richwright to TrudyGirl 2012/07/13 22:41:44

remember there are lot's of stupid people. Fox sez they are fair and balanced and numskulls parrot this back. Maybe the three stooges for President is appropriate for this country?

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/13 23:09:50 (edited)

The actual "three stooges" would do even better than Obama.

Don't like FOX? Then listen to the radio and have some real facts for once instead of your delusional ideas.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/13 23:25:29

get an education son.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/13 23:29:30

Get some facts and more IQ points man.

reply
STEVE to TrudyGirl 2012/07/14 15:04:09

SO YOU WOULD RATHER LIVE UNDER A "COMMUNITY ACTIVIST" ALSO KNOWN AS SHAKE DOWN ARTIST WHO THREATEN BUSINESS TO GET MONEY FOR THEIR ORGANIZATIONS...COME TO THINK OF IT THAT HAS SERVED HIM WELL FOR WHAT HE IS DONG NOW!!!

reply
Bill G53 ~PWCM~JLA 2012/07/06 14:40:35

Mitt Romney

+4
Let's hope people are still looking for "Hope and Change" which PrezBO failed to deliver.

reply
richwright to Bill G5... 2012/07/13 22:43:49

It comes when you kick out the fillibustering pugs.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/13 23:12:57 (edited)

The "hope and change" will come from Obama when pigs fly. Obama has changed the country, but allowing the debt the raise by 5 trillion and letting the unemployment raise by .1% intead of lowering it is not a good change.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/13 23:26:28

If not for the stimulus you would be picking cotton son.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/16 22:14:56 (edited)

If not for Obama's falied stimulus we would be doing better man. You call adding 1.6 trillion dollars to the debt a good stimulus?

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 04:33:07

Yep, absolutely. Kept the auto industry and entire supply chain to that industry afloat. Tens of thousands of jobs saved. Need to raise taxes to balance the budget. Most of the deficit will be quickly reduced once the economy gets reved up.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/17 04:36:59

The economy sucks and always will with Obama. The debt raised by 5 trillion, the unemploemt has been over 8% for over 40 months, and the U.S. credit is ruined.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 04:42:30

selected talking points are not relevant facts.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/17 04:44:25 (edited)

Yes, but what I said were facts. What you said is just opinions and made up "facts".

reply
BUCCANEER~POTL~PWCM~JLA 2012/07/06 14:39:20

Mitt Romney

+6
For the sake of America and ultimately the free world, it has to be

reply
richwright to BUCCANE... 2012/07/13 22:44:18

and the rich corps too.

reply
S. Gompers 2012/07/06 14:31:44

Other

No matter what a liberal is going to win.

reply
richwright to S. Gompers 2012/07/13 22:45:30

yep neither will put women in burkahs and wire their mouths shut. a damn shame.

reply
kyle 2012/07/06 14:29:28

Other

+1
dont care about elections

reply
BUCCANE... to kyle 2012/07/06 14:52:22

+5
Sadly then you will get the government you deserve,or not as the case may be

reply
richwright to BUCCANE... 2012/07/13 22:46:41

she doesn't mind working at Walmart past age 70 to make ends meet and neither do I.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/13 23:14:38

Walmart might be the best job you can get with Obama in office.

Don't worry,if you have Obamacare, you probably won't live past 70.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/13 23:27:24

spoken by a high school kid. what wisdom.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/16 22:16:30 (edited)

Spoken from a retarded man. I know a hell of a lot more than you so you really need to catch up.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 04:35:17

you're a sniveling little brainwashed kid. You didn't even go to college or learn how to formulate an opinion. You don't even know the difference between editorial and news.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/17 04:39:27 (edited)

You idiotic brainwhashed moron. You don't even listen to the radio, the most realible source filled with people that have Masters and PhD degrees and study politics for a living.

I know the difference but you don't. The radio is news, and MSNBC and liberal websites are not.

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 04:48:18

"The radio is news". Do you see a problem with this statement? Does Rush have a Masters or PhD? No he has NO degree. I have multiple degrees including a Masters so you need to listen to me. Take the first two sentences above to anyone with a college degree for analysis. You may be surprised at what you learn.

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/17 04:52:57 (edited)

Never said anything about Rush idiot. I said it was filled with people with multiple Master and PhD degrees, not that everyone has one.

I haven't learned anything from you except that you know nothing about politics.

The radio is news. If you find all of the polls wrong, then you are sayiing that FOX tells the truth.
http://www.poynter.org/latest...

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 14:25:50 (edited)

"The radio is news". Hee, hee, heee!
Re: your link thanks for proving my point!

MSNBC liberals know more than Fox robots.
You must be captain of of your debating team! lol!

reply
ray to richwright 2012/07/17 15:42:23 (edited)

Look what it says under the chart moron.

"FDU political scientist Dan Cassino said the results show “Ideological news sources, like Fox and MSNBC, are really just talking to one audience…. This is solid evidence that if you’re not in that audience, you’re not going to get anything out of watching them."

http://images.sodahead.com/pr...

"The largest effect is that of Fox News: all else being equal, someone who watched only Fox News would be expected to answer just 1.04 domestic questions correctly — a figure which is significantly worse than if they had reported watching no media at all. On the other hand, if they listened only to NPR, they would be expected to answer 1.51 questions correctly; viewers of Sunday morning talk shows fare similarly well. And people watching only The Daily Show with Jon Stewart could answer about 1.42 questions correctly."

reply
richwright to ray 2012/07/17 16:02:26

Talking to one audience does not imply these viewers are less informed unless it is Fox one is talking about. I can tell you don't listen to NPR. Only Fox, Rush, and Savage nation. It shows. You don't even know the difference between news and editorial! Hee, hee, hee. How sad.

reply