Who do you think is right, Geraldo Rivera or Michele Malkin?
tncdel
2012/05/03 19:19:42
|
|
|||||
|
4 votes
|
|
9% | |||
|
40 votes
|
|
87% | |||
|
2 votes
|
|
4% | |||
Please listen to the debate here before answering:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VTbntQcISI&feature;=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VTbntQcISI&feature;=related
Top Opinion
-
Patriot Unit 2012/05/04 00:39:20Malkin [tell us why].+4I would trust Malkin, long before I would trust Rivera. He is an EGO Hound as well.






















Michelle Malkin is always right.
Geraldo Rivera is always wrong.
On this particular issue, why is Michelle right?
First she uses facts,
and Geraldo uses emotion.
That pretty much seals the deal.
But them Geraldo pops a vein,
because he had his head handed to him,
and attacks Michelle.
At that point it is an Epic Fail for Geraldo.
O'Reilly took the douchebag route on the exchange.
He did have Geraldo come back on and apologize,
but Michelle gave him the choice between her, or Geraldo.
O'Reilly chose Geraldo, and his program now suffers.
Geraldo's apparences on O'Reilly are cringe worthy.
Michelle and Kirsten's segments were some of the best he had on his show.
They have been replaced with two segments.
One is a direct replacement,
the other is a pseudo replacement,
and both are not very good at all.
Carlson and Hoover do not even hold a candle as "culture warriors."
And the Colmes and Crowley's segments are headache inducing.
Once again a direct result of Geraldo.
So that makes him wrong three times.
At this point to is an Extra Epic Fail, with whipped cream, sprinkles, and a cherry on top.
Geraldo sucks even more today, than he every did in the past.
An amazing accomplishment, even for him.
Are you going soft on me?
Very good.
You did not go soft.
*thankful*
With 40% of the people in the United States identifying themselves as conservative, and 20% of the people in the United States identifying themselves as liberal, wouldn't you say it is an accurate representation?
Why do so many Democrats get elected into office? The same reason so many Democrats voted for Reagan. The 40% that you thought were missing in the poll are people who are not self identified conservatives or liberals. How do they vote? Well, there is your answer, they vote for both Republicans and Democrats. Likewise, not all self identified conservatives, liberals, or registered Republicans and Democrats always vote the way the media, polsters, and predictors thing they do. Have you ever voted a straight party ticket in your life? I have never voted a straight party ticket in my life, and to you I am a "conservative nazi-like extremist". So there you go, that is how Democrats get elected.
You also seem to forget that when either the Republicans get into power, or ...
Why do so many Democrats get elected into office? The same reason so many Democrats voted for Reagan. The 40% that you thought were missing in the poll are people who are not self identified conservatives or liberals. How do they vote? Well, there is your answer, they vote for both Republicans and Democrats. Likewise, not all self identified conservatives, liberals, or registered Republicans and Democrats always vote the way the media, polsters, and predictors thing they do. Have you ever voted a straight party ticket in your life? I have never voted a straight party ticket in my life, and to you I am a "conservative nazi-like extremist". So there you go, that is how Democrats get elected.
You also seem to forget that when either the Republicans get into power, or the Democrats get into power, they ultimately and eventually screw things up. Clinton was elected with less than 50% of the popular vote because enough people who would have voted for the GOP candidate where disgusted enough to vote for Ross Perot, while others voted for Clinton. Why? Because they were disgusted with Bush 41.
I agree, there are plenty of level headed conservatives out there, AND there are also plenty of level headed liberals out there. What we see on TV is the extremes, always will be. Even when the original Crossfire was on CNN, Buchanan and Press (a conservative not a waterboy for the GOP, and a liberal not a waterboy for the Democrats) had civil debates about issues. I am not sure that will happen again, it would be constructive if it did.
I disagree with you that Geraldo is in anyway a conservative. Geraldo's political positions are reliably to the left, and always have been. Michelle Malkin is a true blue conservative, and there is nothing about her position that should surprise or outrage anyone. She is not totalitarian, but she does demand that people here illegally not be allowed to continue to break the law. There is nothing extreme about that.
Thanks for your clearand interesting reply, there's just a couple of things I wanted to add:
- When I mentioned "conservative nazi-like extremists", I wasn't targeting you specifically.
- I have read somewhere that Geraldo was a registered Republican.
I agree with Michelle, so I assumed I would be "conservative nazi-like extremist." LOL I did understand it was not targeted at me though. I did think you were calling me that. We are good.
Geraldo might indeed be registered to vote as a Republican. I have no idea. I know him from what he says on TV, that is what I am going by, and there is nothing about him that stikes me as conservative.
I do not find how people are registered to vote as being indicative as much at all to tell you the truth. Where I live I know many people who are registered the way they are because of local politics; one party runs local government, so to not be registered that way leaves a voter with no voice in the primary, the only election that matters here.
Yeah, you got me there.
I am not down with that.
A person being here illegally is the government's issue, as it deals with federal law. There are so many ways to detect if someone is here illegally, by the authorities I mean, that individual citizens being "narcs" is kind of ridiculous in my mind. A non-citizen's status in the country is really between them and the law, not the busy body who lives on the street. So yeah, I am with you on that.
Michelle was way off base I feel saying Geraldo was playing the so-called emotion card. Michelle lied when she said she never defined race. Michelle discriminates, as she usually does, this time in a flimsy effort to sidetrack her methods to discriminate, that is, wher...
Michelle was way off base I feel saying Geraldo was playing the so-called emotion card. Michelle lied when she said she never defined race. Michelle discriminates, as she usually does, this time in a flimsy effort to sidetrack her methods to discriminate, that is, where this immigration issue is concerned. Michelle knew when she was invited on O’Reilly’s “no spin” (barf) show the topic was illegal immigration. Did Michelle get it twisted thinking the topic was the illegal immigrants were Irish? Michelle knew the subject was about Mexicans and I’m not buying it when she says she never defined race, BS, Michelle showed she knew when she slid the ‘Gerald has an open border narcissist problem’ card onto the table. I am sure Michelle was not referring to open borders in Ireland. Frankly when Michelle had the nerve to talk about “projections”, I had to smile. Michelle’s lips drip with lie juice. To me, the notion of good faith as she espouses is not synonymous with the likes of one Michelle Malkin, so HeII to the no, she is not right.
Any foreigner who sneaks into our country like a Japanese nina to pillage it and plunder it is an invader, not an immigrant. And if you persist according them respect they don't have by referring to them as "immigrants," then so too were the Nazis who "immigrated" to France in WW II.
Who are you to talk about pillaging and plundering America? Who is the real “invader”? In addition, do not use the old Nazis who immigrated to France routine, stupidest allowed much to take place during this period you seem stuck in.
I afford all human life respect and I do not subscribe to population transfer and believe it is never a solution to ethnic struggle. Before you write next time educate yourself, I recommend Dennis Ross, the peace process ISBN 0-88728-308-X and Timothy Waters, On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing.
I urge Americans of Latino descent be proud of their heritage just as I am of mine but also remember that as American citizens our duty to consider what is good for OUR country, not our race or ethnicty.