Who Do You Think Currently Has the Upper Hand in the 2012 Election?

WILL THIS BE BEFORE THE HIS HEATHY CARE IS OVER TURNED?

Obama and the Supreme Court

> >
> > Obama's Solicitor General, and recent appointment
> > to the bench, has leaked to Obama the courts vote of last Friday was 5/4
> > to strike down Obama's health care law. Look to see the Democrats heavy hand in
> > trying to get the decision changed before the June announcement..
> >
> > Obama May Be In Deep Trouble... with Chief Justice John Roberts, US
> > Supreme Court Anthony G. Martin - North St. Paul News
> > According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal
> > government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the US Supreme Court may be inevitable.
> >
> > Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics have hammered
> > him on a number of Constitutional issues. Critics have complained that much,
> > if not all of Obama's major initiatives run headlong into Constitutional
> > roadblocks on the power of the federal government. Obama certainly did
> > not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he used the venue of the State
> > of the Union address early in the year to publicly flog the Court over its
> > ruling that the First Amendment grants the right to various organizations
> > to run political ads during the time of an election. The tongue-lashing
> > clearly did not sit well with the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito,
> > who publicly shook his head and stated under his breath, 'That's not true,'
> > when Obama told a flat-out lie concerning the Court's ruling.
> >
> > As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship
> > between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal
> > government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he blatantly continued
> > to propose legislation that flies in the face of every known Constitutional
> > principle upon which this nation has stood for over 200 years.
> >
> > Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one
> > enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and
> > so on. And it is no accident that the one
> > swing-vote on the court, Justice Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he
> > has no intention of retiring until 'Obama is gone.' Apparently, the Court
> > has had enough. The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner,
> > of course, that it intends to address the issues about which Obama
> > critics have been screaming to high heaven. A ruling against Obama on any
> > one of these important issues could potentially cripple the
> > Administration. Such a thing would be long overdue.
> >
> > First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle
> > barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase
> > something. And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to
> > purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim. The
> > Constitution limits the FEDERAL government, not state governments, from
> > such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen could
> > opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive a
> > vehicle. In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can 'opt out.'
> >
> > Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted
> > information concerning discrepancies in Obama's history that raise
> > serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President. The charge
> > goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. This information involves
> > possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number in Connecticut , while Obama
> > was a high school student in Hawaii . .. And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
> >
> > Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of
> > interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many
> > Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the
> > Court. Frankly, in the years this writer has observed politics, nothing comes
> > close to comparing with the rampant corruption of this Administration, not even
> > during the Nixon years. Nixon and the Watergate conspirators look like
> > choirboys compared to the jokers that populate this Administration.
> >
> > In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule on the dreadful
> > decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of Arizona . That, too, could
> > send the Obama doctrine of open borders to an early grave, given that the
> > Administration refuses to enforce federal law on illegal aliens.
> >
> > And finally, the biggie that could potentially send the entire house of
> > cards tumbling in a free-fall is the latest revelation concerning the
> > Obama-Holder Department of Justice and its refusal to pursue the New
> > Black Panther Party. The group was caught on tape committing felonies by
> > attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into staying away from the
> > polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the DOJ is now charging Holder with
> > the deliberate refusal to pursue cases against Blacks, particularly those
> > who are involved in radical hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers,
> > who have been caught on tape calling for the murder of white people and their
> > babies. This one is a biggie that could send the entire Administration
> > crumbling--that is, if the Justices have the guts to draw a line in the
> > sand at the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.