How can the House be consider Obstuctionist. They are the representatives of the people. They have a simple majority vote.
Whenever the party doesn't get there way, they are going to call the Republicans names. It is Standard Liberal Operating Procedure (SLOP). Call name, stamp feet
WHO ARE THE OBSTRUCTIONISTS??
Tuna
2012/08/06 11:27:54
|
|
|||||
|
2 votes
|
|
7% | |||
|
23 votes
|
|
82% | |||
|
3 votes
|
|
11% | |||
The House of Representatives have passed a "BALANCED BUDGET AMENDMENT" with serious debt reduction measures. The Bill passed with overwhelming BI-PARTISAN support.
Over in the Senate, Obama's Economic Plan was hit with a 97-0 vote; HENCE Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, will not even ALLOW the discussions to begin.
Can we at least TALK about stopping the bleeding ??
What did Harry Reid propose to stop the bleeding? Anything?? Just the other day he found time to accuse Mitt Romney of avoiding his tax BURDEN for 10 years. Harry could have begun the fiscal discussion instead??
Over in the Senate, Obama's Economic Plan was hit with a 97-0 vote; HENCE Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, will not even ALLOW the discussions to begin.
Can we at least TALK about stopping the bleeding ??
What did Harry Reid propose to stop the bleeding? Anything?? Just the other day he found time to accuse Mitt Romney of avoiding his tax BURDEN for 10 years. Harry could have begun the fiscal discussion instead??
Top Opinion
-
Kiosk Kid 2012/08/06 13:49:21
Whenever the party doesn't get there way, they are going to call the Republicans names. It is Standard Liberal Operating Procedure (SLOP). Call name, stamp feet
The other 5 percent of the time they will provide a reference that doesn't contain any facts to back up their accusation or they will make a quote but won't produce a reference.
A Liberal will always try to have their accusation accepted as a fact. However A Liberal can't produce facts to support the party line because Marxism doesn't work.
SLOP is my trademark.
Normally you won't see them producing a quote from their reference that backs up their accusation and the reference. If they do, you need to read the entire reference because they are cherry picking. I have slammed a lot of Liberals with their own reference.
If it initially looks like they produced a fact to support the party line, you need to get very suspicious because it is simply not possible. It will end up as some kind of fallacy.
The Senate failed to advance Rep. Paul Ryan's budget plan by a vote of 40-57, a vote on which five Republicans voted against their party.
The Senate voted unanimously on Wednesday to reject a $3.7 trillion budget plan that President Obama sent to Capitol Hill in February.
True that ninety-seven senators voted against a motion to take it up. Democratic aides said ahead of the vote that the Democratic caucus would not support the plan because it had been supplanted by the deficit-reduction plan Obama outlined at a speech at George Washington University in April where Obama discussed a more ambitious plan at that university to save $4 trillion over 12 years. Republicans criticized his speech for lacking detail.
RIde on.