White House stands by position that health law mandate isn't a tax
The White House is standing by its position that individual mandate
in President Obama's healthcare law is a penalty despite the Supreme
Court's decision to uphold it as a tax.
White House spokesman Jay
Carney told reporters traveling with Obama on Friday that the mandate
enforces a penalty, not a tax, because people have a choice whether
to obtain health insurance.
"You can call it what you will, but if
affects 1 percent" of the population, Carney said, according to a White
House pool report.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said in the court’s majority
opinion Thursday that the healthcare law “imposes a tax citizens may
lawfully choose to pay in lieu of buying health insurance.” In doing so,
he embraced the government's fallback legal argument, which was that
the mandate is constitutional under Congress's taxing powers.
Republicans
have seized on the ruling to argue that Obama misled the public by
arguing during the healthcare debate that the mandate is not a tax. He
and congressional Democrats strongly disputed the charge that the
mandate would raise taxes during the bitter debate before the law was
passed.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell pointed to the
court's ruling on the mandate to argue that the healthcare law was
passed "on a deception."
The mandate requires most taxpayers to either buy insurance or make a payment to the IRS starting in 2014.
Jonathan
Gruber, a healthcare economist who helped design Obama’s healthcare
overhaul, made the same point as Carney on a conference call with
reporters Friday.
“It’s not a tax on the middle class,” Gruber said. “It’s a choice they’re making.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementa...
Top Opinion
-
+13There is no low that Obama and crew won't go. The SC just said it IS a tax, otherwise Obamacare would have been declared unconstitutional. The GOP are going to slam Obama hard on this one and the Tea Party are coming out again and coming out hard.
argue with him ...!
and you just basically said the same thing in both posts ,,dan pointed out facts ....!
you dont have a valid rebuttal ?
Indeed they are. But his plan, which subsidizes some 30 million uninsured, amounts to a $1.8 trillion whammy on working families. And that's just for starters.
The court was silent about the 20 other different taxes hidden in ObamaCare, more than half of which affect families earning less than $250,000 a year.
The new taxes, which cost some $675 billion over the next decade, include:
• A 2.3% excise tax on U.S. sales of medical devices that's already devastating the medical supply industry and its workforce. The levy is a $20 billion blow to an industry that employs roughly 400,000.
Several major manufacturers have been roiled, including: Michigan-based Stryker Corp., which blames the tax for 1,000 layoffs; Indiana-based Zimmer Corp., which cites the tax in laying off 450 and taking a $50 million charge against earnings; Indiana-based Cook Medical Inc., which has scrubbed plans to open a U.S. factory; Minnesota-based Medtronic Inc., which expects an annual charge agains...
Indeed they are. But his plan, which subsidizes some 30 million uninsured, amounts to a $1.8 trillion whammy on working families. And that's just for starters.
The court was silent about the 20 other different taxes hidden in ObamaCare, more than half of which affect families earning less than $250,000 a year.
The new taxes, which cost some $675 billion over the next decade, include:
• A 2.3% excise tax on U.S. sales of medical devices that's already devastating the medical supply industry and its workforce. The levy is a $20 billion blow to an industry that employs roughly 400,000.
Several major manufacturers have been roiled, including: Michigan-based Stryker Corp., which blames the tax for 1,000 layoffs; Indiana-based Zimmer Corp., which cites the tax in laying off 450 and taking a $50 million charge against earnings; Indiana-based Cook Medical Inc., which has scrubbed plans to open a U.S. factory; Minnesota-based Medtronic Inc., which expects an annual charge against earnings of $175 million, and Boston Scientific Corp., which has opted to open plants in tax-friendlier Ireland and China to help offset a $100 million charge against earnings.
mp3Subscribe to the IBD Editorials Podcast
• A 3.8% surtax on investment income from capital gains and dividends that applies to single filers earning more than $200,000 and married couples filing jointly earning more than $250,000.
• A $50,000 excise tax on charitable hospitals that fail to meet new "community health assessment needs," "financial assistance" and other rules set by the Health and Human Services Dept.
• A $24 billion tax on the paper industry to control a pollutant known as black liquor.
• A $2.3 billion-a-year tax on drug companies.
• A 10% excise tax on indoor tanning salons.
• An $87 billion hike in Medicare payroll taxes for employees, as well as the self-employed.
• A hike in the threshold for writing off medical expenses to 10% of adjusted gross income from 7.5%.
• A new cap on flexible spending accounts of $2,500 a year.
• Elimination of the tax deduction for employer-provided prescription drug coverage for Medicare recipients.
• An income surtax of 1% of adjusted gross income, rising to 2.5% by 2016, on individuals who refuse to go along with ObamaCare by buying a policy not OK'd by the government.
• A $2,000 tax charged to employers with 50 or more workers for every full-time worker not offered health coverage.
• A $60 billion tax on health insurers.
• A 40% excise tax on so-called Cadillac, or higher cost, health insurance plans.
All told, there are 21 new or higher taxes imposed by Obama's health care law — and 21 more reasons to repeal it.
IS your president above the LAW?
Then, walk over to your mirror and take a good look, because if you have a job and you pay taxes, you are looking at it.
If you think taxes and costs won't go WAY up because of this, I have some great swamp land in Florida to sell you.
If this was a tax, then it originated in the wrong chamber of Congress. It came out of the Senate, not the House. Boink!
http://www.sodahead.com/unite...
Part of that is taxation and the PRENTALTIES thereof. All other types of Penalties are under the Court system in the order of criminal actions. Only tax evasion can evoke a Penalty of the type that Obama wants. Judge Roberts knew that from earlier rulings, therefore, the executive power has no authority to make any law that would be called a Penalty.
Obama may have studied Constitutional law, but he forgot to study the past cases that had come before the Supreme Court. If he did, be didn’t dig deep enough.
I likely know more about the constitution than Obama does. I have in my Library a copy of the book;
“ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF THE CASES OF THE SUPREME COURT”
For you that don’t have the book, it can be studied at the Legislative Reference Service, Library of Congress.com
This administration must think us fools.
It is a tax if you're arguing before the court.
It's not a tax if you are defending the bill in public.
But it is a tax so the SCOTUS can vote it Constitutional.
It doesn't matter what you call it, someone has to pay the bill(s).