While American Airlines and US Airways Still Have to Convince the FTC That Their Proposed Merger Doesn’t Create a Monopoly, Do You Think It’s a Good Idea?
ABC News U.S.
2013/02/18 21:00:00
|
|
|||||
|
1,955 votes
|
|
22% | |||
|
6,957 votes
|
|
78% | |||
American Airlines and US Airways still have to convince the Federal Trade Commission that their proposed merger doesn't create a monopoly, but company officials and industry observers seem confident it will go through.
So, if you're a frequent flyer on one, the other, or both, how will this affect you? Well, first of all, even the airlines themselves acknowledge the full merger process will take at least 18 months. So if you're worried about your frequent flyer miles, you have a year and a half to burn through them. In fact, while the two airlines are in the process of smushing themselves into one, you may well be able to use each airline's miles on the other. That's what Continental and United did when they merged.
All in all, travel experts say miles-holders usually "fare" fine in these situations -- pardon the pun. But there are upsides and downsides to everything. Click on the link below for some of the main ones.
So, if you're a frequent flyer on one, the other, or both, how will this affect you? Well, first of all, even the airlines themselves acknowledge the full merger process will take at least 18 months. So if you're worried about your frequent flyer miles, you have a year and a half to burn through them. In fact, while the two airlines are in the process of smushing themselves into one, you may well be able to use each airline's miles on the other. That's what Continental and United did when they merged.
All in all, travel experts say miles-holders usually "fare" fine in these situations -- pardon the pun. But there are upsides and downsides to everything. Click on the link below for some of the main ones.
Read More: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/pros-cons-american-...
Top Opinion
-
Professor Wizard 2013/02/21 19:57:56No, because there is the potential for higher fares and fewer partner airlines+3American sucks as an airline... lousy fares, poor service, and padded charges everywhere you look. Almost criminal.




















The government is a monopoly. We don't hear liberals crying about that.
I recently flew to Dayton Ohio (Ugh). Those were not practical choices so it was American and the horrid Hub stuff. Dallas on the way and Chicago O'hare on the return. Very long travel days!
It is the natural course of a free market, and Free Market Capitalism is a God.
Who are you to question God, you heretic heathen?
European carriers like British Airways, Lufthansa, and Turkish Airlines continue to provide a far superior level of service (in the economy cabins) compared to the US based competitors... for the same fares, may times better. Even the staff in airports like Heathrow, Frankfurt, and Brussels tend to be much more courteous and helpful (the security police in Frankfurt spoke better English than most Americans).
I'm not asking to go back to the days when flying was only for the rich. We don't need piano bars taking up 200 seats on a plane... just the decent treatment that one would expect as a human being who has paid good money and just wants to get home.
The only way it is possible to sustain a monopoly is if the government interferes. Therefore, airlines should be allowed to merge, split, start, and go out of business as demand increases and decreases without government interference. The only legitimate role of the government is for a redress of grievances if one party takes advantage of another party.
This isn't a monopoly firstly, there is a great amount of competition in air travel, and not only that there are more ways to get from A to B than just by flying, so we have auto, bus, and railroad all competing in the same market.