Which political nickname do you like more,. Obamaloney for Obama's criticism or Romney Hood for Romney's plans ?? And Why ??

I did not insinuate anything. He is a thief. I am not going to list what Romney has done. That would be like listing reasons why the sky is blue.
When Romney fired people from many of the companies he bought...he declared the companies bankrupt. When he did that he did not have to pay the employees their pensions. People were robbed of the money owed to them. Yes it was legal to conduct his business in that way, but it makes him no less of a thief.
Romney did not personally break into a house and take the TV set and Grandmas pearl necklace, however through vulture capitalism he did steal from people.
Try to find ONE family (yes I yelled) that can say that Obama took their jobs, wages and pensions?
Obama saved the auto industry. How can you deny him the credit for that? Romney said to let it go broke, and sell it off to investors.....let the "free market" decide. Obama took a big risk, and bailed them out. As a result thousands of decent hard working people kept their jobs, and the US auto industry is healthy and profitable. After that success Romney tried to take credit for what Obama did.

Look.......you support Romney....fine.. I do not. You vote for him and I will vote for Obama. That is called Democracy.

Let's take a look at what you're saying. You peg him as a thief (yet can’t list why, because you can’t) and state he fired people. These people would have been fired, laid off or otherwise furloughed regardless of Romney, Joe Blow or the Easter Bunny…they worked for companies that were failing; Bain Capital took a risk (with private capital) and tried to save the company; in many cases, Bain failed just like the company it tried to save! If the company fails, the pensions go bye bye, get it. People were ‘robbed of money owed to them’, correct, but who was the robber? You say Romney; I say Barney Frank and the Community Reinvestment Act, and its grand plan to destroy the economy? You ‘insinuate’ Bain should have come in and paid then pensions of folks (into perpetuity) they never had an interest or investment.

Obama ‘saved ‘the auto industry…really, how about the taxpayers saved GM; and how about all the bond holders of GM that were paid 20 cents on their dollar so Obama could hand over control of GM to the UAW, Richard Trumpka and the AFL-CIO. To this day, GM still HAS NOT shown a profit…tell us all they have. By the way, the non-GM auto industry is ‘healthy and profitable’, not GM. GM is about to go belly-up, again, are you suggesting another bailout of GM? Perhaps Bain Capital could save GM.

Please, vote Obama, and yes, I’ll vote Romney…your vote nullifies mine.

his tax plan steals from the middle class and gives to the rich

How?

hope you don't mind if i play through?

i'd like to tell the kracer that Obama steals from the entire economy to buy votes to get re elected.

but he has me blocked.

Not at all. It's interesting how libs have all the anecdotal ‘evidence’ on Romney one could very easily find on the Huffington Post, yet after 42 months of unemployment over 8%, hundreds of billions of the people’s money given to crony friends, 100 rounds of golf, and regulations by Presidential fiat, these wing-nuts want more and more of the same. The class envy is clearly in their narrative; look for words like ‘rich’, ‘fair’, ‘poor’ and ‘disenfranchised’; all code words for legally robbing the successful, for redistribution to the so-called ‘underprivileged’. Try this experiment; the next time you have a conversation with a lib, ask him/her: ‘What magic number, in dollars, per person would satisfy you to educate, feed, shelter and clothe the so called underprivileged? Ask that person to put a number to it and see what you get.

you're preaching to the choir, brother. you are exactly correct.

i have no earthly idea why anyone could support that guy.

i like the narrative that the rich are getting richer and that all they need is a higher marginal rate on the top earners and everything will be fine.

if the top 50% of earners already pay 100% of all income taxes, what would make more sense? that they pay 200% of all income taxes? or 300%?

its just a rhetorical tactic to get more money into the gov't so they can continue spending like this to buy more votes.

it's criminal.

have you not read the Tax Policy Center analysis

http://www.theatlantic.com/bu...

The article is speculation...what Obama has given us so far is not.

Are you able to speak beyond taking cheap shots and posting second hand articles?

According to you liberals the middle class are the ones that have nothing the ones needing all the help so what does the middle class have that he can steal? 49% of the people don't pay any tax.The rich are paying over 70% of what tax money the government collects.You liberals keep crying the rich need to pay their fair share don't you think something should be done so the 49% can pay their fair share also.

INCOME taxes, RD. 49% pay no federal income tax.

i only say that because the next response you see would be the libkracer telling you that those 40% pay plenty of taxes, which would be true. unfortunately, they pay no FEDERAL Taxes. many, in fact, get money back from the federal gov't, so they could be considered receiving federal welfare.

Not raising taxes on the rich doesn't automatically mean stealing from the middle class.

Explain....

romneyhood was a fail on obama's part. did you guys see where one guy caught obama on it?

No I haven't seen that. See if you can find it in a video.

the search is VERY slow right now i'll try to get one at the latest 2moro tho.

Okay, my dad called and told me about it last time I talked to him. I ask him where he got it from. You know, URL and all. Btw, sorry getting back to you so late!

It fits to a "T"...bologna all the way. But when it comes from Obama it is usually more than bologna...

yeah i totally love his fail on the romney hood statement.

And you would think Obama couldn't be a Muslim with all of the pork spending he has done.

MMMmmmm........Pork sausage.....

Because Obama has been slicing out baloney on a lot of things, especially "You didn't build that."

It's totally origianl and authored by Mitt himself as compared to a committee who has to engage in group therapy to think for Obama.

Imagine that...it took a Democratic "think tank" to come up with that. LMAO.

Obamaloney . . . obama's marxist ideas. . .

Don't you think the gun reference is much more fitting to the cons and the Romney robber barons?

I have always admired your wonderful sense of humor my dear!!! LOL :)

I do realize you have those words twisted !! LOL :)
I feel that you did not do that intentionally!! LOL :)

Well it is conservatives who like their guns isn't it? We on the other hand are the peaceful ones.

EVERY American citizen is granted under the Constitution their 2nd Amendment rights.

Yep as I am a gun owner myself. So what's your point?

"Well it is conservatives who like their guns isn't it? " quote from giantfan.

The point is NOT a conservative issue . . .
as you so eloquently pointed out!!

BUT a RIGHT as an AMERICAN CITIZEN !!

But it's conservatives who whine about it all the time. Oh those big bad dems will take our guns away. Obama is taking our gun rights from us. Really, I ask people what has Obama done in the way of 2ed ammendments rights since he took office. With all the conservative whining and lying it turns out the only thing he did was give more gun rights. The right to carry concelled loaded guns on federal park lands.

Obama will not do the dirty deed he will hand it over to the United Nations . . .

Really, the UN can tell the people of the United States whether they can own guns or not? That's funny. Why didn't they tell the Iranians or Iraqis or Afghans they can't own guns? Because they can't. The UN is a figure head with no power what-so-ever. God you cons fear everything. Boo.....LOL
Now if you'd spend less time looking up silly pictures and more time checking the facts you may actually learn something of value like the facts.