Which of the Following Presidential Candidates Do You Currently Support?

iamaqt commented (on http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
I think the paradigm shift has made a lot of people lose their math skills as well.

All I saw after the 4/24 primaries were articles talking about Romney's "big win" in 5 states. The glaring reality of that big win is that the media has created apathy.

In Rhode Island, for instance, only 14,488 people voted. There are over 1 million people in that state. Most of the states that voted on 4/24 had less than 2% of the state population actually get out and vote. Pennsylvania was the only exception with 6.3% of that state's population voting.

So, even with the media effectively brainwashing most people that Romney is the only alternative to Obama, people still did not want him. Instead of doing the math, people just took the media's word that it was a "sweep". That kind of sweep will never, ever beat Obama.

All five states that voted on 4/24 held closed primaries, meaning only registered Republicans could vote. In Romney's only voter base, there was glaring apathy.

The rEVOLution consists of disenfranchised Democrats (that's me), true conservatives within the Republican party, and Independent/Libertarian voters.

If people really are wanting Anybody But Obama, they better jump on board with a candidate that appeals to more than just apathetic neocons, that's for sure.

One correction ....Delaware had 3.2 of the state's population get out to vote so PA wasn't the only exception of being under 2%. Still pretty pathetic though!

Racism and Homophobia are not a solution.

Ron Paul voted AGAINST the MLK Holiday.

Ron Paul voted AGAINST awarding Rosa Parks the Congressional Medal of Freedom.

Ron Paul said he would have voted AGAINST the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Paul has a 30 year history of pandering to the KKK and White Power Movement.

You can make all the LAME excuses for White Supremacist Ron Paul you want. His actions speak louder than words

-FACT: Ron Paul's presidential campaign issued a flyer that boasted about the candidate's efforts to introduce legislation that would remove challenges to the anti-gay Defense of Marriage Act from the federal court system.
http://www.joemygod.blogspot....

-FACT: Ron Paul's Iowa state director is Mike Heath, a long-term Christian-right activist who formerly served as the board chairman of an SPLC-certified anti-gay hate group known as "Americans for Truth About Homosexuality."
http://thenewcivilrightsmovem...

-FACT: Ron Paul has a long history of racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic comments.
http://www.tnr.com/article/po...

-FACT: As state above, Ron Paul supports the so-called "states' rights" approach to marriage, but interestingly, only for LGBT couples.
http://www.yourtango.com/2008...

-FACT: Ron Paul said, "If I were in Congress in 1996, I would have voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which used Congress' constitutional authority to define what official state documents other states have to recognize under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, to ensure that no state would be forced to recognize a same-sex marriage license issued in another state."
http://www.thepoliticalguide....

-FACT: Ron Paul opposes the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would prohibit discrimination against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity by civilian, nonreligious employers.
http://www.salon.com/2007/09/...

Top row (left to right)



John Bedell

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...


Richard Poplawski

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...


Byron Williams

http://mediamatters.org/resea...


Joshua Cartwright

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...




Bottom row (left to right)



Jim David Adkisson

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/...


Scott Roeder

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...


James von Brunn

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...


Jared Lee Loughner

http://www.huffingtonpost.com...

Ron Paul did all that because he knows and understands the Constitution's limitations on what government is allowed to do and government is not allowed to use taxpayer funds for anything except running the government. No funds are supposed to be used for charity or welfare or wars unless specifically declared, and none are to be used to maintain a standing army. And no taxpayer funds are supposed to be used to give to other nations as aid (the people are allowed, as individuals to send their ow money as aid, but the governmetn is enjoined from doing so.

The federal government is prohibited by the Constitution to interfere in the lives and business of the people. It is not allowed to make laws concerning marriage, sexual activites, medical choices, what kinds of appliances (or lightbulbs) are allowed to be used in people's homes, what foods the people may eat or the drugs they may take. And your link aboaut his "antisemitism" is a lie, he is not, nor is he racist, nor sexist, nor anti-gay. If the federal government obeyed the Constitution none of these things would have ever been done by the fed gov. Please educate yourself better, you are listening to and reading lies designed to make Dr. Paul seem unfit as a candidate, no one in either the D or R party wants to stop dong the unconstitutional things government is doing and the media being the lapdog of the government publishes and broadcasts only what the elite in government, the corporations and the big banks want them to publish and broadcast.