Which news source is worse, Fox News or MSNBC?

by DFA Posted 2012/06/16 00:58:43

297 votes
Read all 191 opinions
Lightning Report View Results and Demographics + View Demographics

Loading Demographics... Click an icon to see demographic results Display unknown and private
	FOX	101 votes	34%
	MSNBC	129 votes	43%
	Both are bad	60 votes	20%
	Other... explain	7 votes	2%

Add a comment above

Maverick Capitalist 2012/06/16 20:28:32

MSNBC

+13
MSNBC is not a news organization, it is rather a propaganda machine for a progressive ideology, which perhaps explains their poor ratings. http://www.huffingtonpost.com...
>> See Replies

More polls by DFA

Joe 2013/04/12 08:50:26

MSNBC

msnbc does not report news they give their opinion. no one cares about your opinion al sharpton, rachell maddow, chris mathews etc you dont even try to be balanced you just attack conservatives and call them rascist because you have no facts to back your own side

reply
Jojo 2012/12/31 06:28:15

MSNBC

+1
In numerous studies, MSNBC has shown to be way more biased and distorting of the truth (not to mention what they censor) than any other network but especially Fox News. Almost any show I've seen on Fox has had an opposite opinion on the political spectrum while I've barely ever seen a legitimate republican on MSNBC who was allowed to show his opinion. Fox is way more balanced and way, way more fair.

reply
david.asaro.94 2012/09/14 00:34:02 (edited)

FOX

Fox actually won the right to lie in 2003, I believe, so its all good.. Ref. http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik...

reply
Eric 2012/08/14 16:55:18
Muriel 2012/07/06 23:41:39

MSNBC

+1
Fox try's to be fair and balance, MSNBC doesn't bother.

reply
Bob S to Muriel 2013/01/12 17:45:56

MSNBC doesn't try tp dp anything right. Maybe that is why they are such a left...ist group.

reply
will 2012/06/28 14:40:30

MSNBC

no different than cnn and all the others

reply
Greywolf~In God We Trust~ 2012/06/22 17:39:13

MSNBC

I can't watch either one for more than about 10 minutes, the constant banter about the indecisiveness of whoever they are whining about seems so rediculous and out of touch most of the time. I can see the truth somewhere in the middle of the lies, and misinformation.

reply
Jesse 2012/06/22 12:08:29

MSNBC

+1
Caught editing Romney's speech in the Pennsylvania WaWa. They lost all credibility a long time ago.

reply
Bob S to Jesse 2012/06/23 01:30:21

They were caught several times doctoring tapes.

reply
Geenie Nabottle 2012/06/21 16:35:58

FOX

+1
Faux is not news, it's a hyperbole/racist/lying/hypocr... flavored shyt sandwich smeared across the tv screens of millions of usefull idiots daily.

reply
Bob S to Geenie ... 2012/06/21 16:55:29

+1
Me thinks you are biased in the wrong faux MSNBC.

reply
Geenie ... to Bob S 2012/06/21 16:57:23 (edited)

What?

I'm sorry, come again.....

reply
Jojo to Geenie ... 2012/12/31 06:13:53

+5
He said, "HE THINKS THAT YOU ARE BIASED TWORDS MSNBC AND THE LEFT WING IN GENERAL." Did you pick that up?

reply
Bureauc 0webama 2012/06/21 00:46:42 (edited)

MSNBC

+1
MSNBC by far, their lips are stuck to 0webama's @ss. No balance at all.

Edited fior spelling. I know the Spelling Nazis are trolling around here.

reply
Proggy 2012/06/20 06:24:13

FOX

+2
Fox News are LIARS & BIGOTS! In fact FOX news is NOT news at all.

MOST PEOPLE SAY FOX News is full of crap!

reply
Bureauc... to Proggy 2012/06/21 00:51:21

+2
Fox news has the most balanced coverage as well as the more balanced audience. It's possible that more liberals watch Fox than MSLSD, since their audience is so miniscule.

reply
Proggy to Bureauc... 2012/06/27 16:24:39

+1
Have another glass....

Seems like you can't get enough! FOX have been proven to be liars, distorters, and spin doctors by so many different sources that they're the butt of all jokes in the realm of journalism. Why do you think FOX or anyone remotely associated with them aren't even as much as an honorable mentions at journalistic Meccas like the Peabody's or Pulitzer's? Because they're a fraud and a joke.

reply
thegodf... to Proggy 2012/10/26 00:10:31

+1
Owebama has been drinking too much of the Fox News Kool-aid. Maybe he is suffering from Romnesia and he definitely has caught a FTD.

reply
Bob S to Proggy 2012/06/21 16:56:18

+1
Then why is it that never has any particular hour ever beat the competing hour of FOX.

reply
Proggy to Bob S 2012/06/27 16:18:47

While FOX monopolize all the of the willfully ignorant and wanton stupid people, the rest of the populace are split between the other credible networks. That's what's so funny about you people you actually equate "ratings" to "FACTS & TRUTH". Do you also believe there is a sponge that lives in a pineapple under the sea? Yeah, that also gets high ratings.

reply
Bob S to Proggy 2012/06/23 01:31:34

+1
You've been watching MSNBC for anaylsis again...

reply
Proggy to Bob S 2012/06/27 16:18:58

Debunk it.

reply
Bob S to Proggy 2012/06/29 18:08:12

Let the VIEWING PUBLIC DO THAT FOR YOU. #1 fox, #2 msnbc FAR BEHIND AND CNN A VERY DISTANT 3. NOW YOUR TURN TO DEBUNK. It it the audience that makes up the base that want to listen to the BS or MSNBC and your 2 are last and next to last. Facts speak louder than your words.

reply
Proggy to Bob S 2012/06/29 20:06:53 (edited)
..::localeye::.. 2012/06/19 22:23:37

Both are bad

+1
Both are horrible networks that create narratives that don't exist to fire up their naive audiences.

reply
joshua ben-ami 2012/06/18 12:01:06

Other... explain

+1
it's not so much the source... but the presentation of the news, how much whether or not they present the event with all of the facts or manipulate the facts of the event to portray more favorably to their point of view. ( aka perception management or spin doctoring)

reply
Soundstorm 2012/06/18 08:46:50

MSNBC

+3
The place to go when a bitter soul seeks to feed his black pit of vitriol with hateful rants and baseless slanders.

reply
Bob S to Soundstorm 2012/06/21 16:57:38

+1
The four musketeers...Bull, crap, loser, freak...all 4 stick together like glue.

reply
Soundstorm to Bob S 2012/06/21 20:28:00

Sounds like a candy bar that's bad for my teeth.

reply
Bob S to Soundstorm 2012/06/29 18:09:04

+1
and they are very bad for vision and hearing.

reply
Jesse to Soundstorm 2012/06/22 12:11:27

+1
Oooo I feel a tingle running up my leg...............LOL

reply
Bob S to Jesse 2012/06/29 18:09:29

+1
There Matthews goes again.

reply
Aksana 2012/06/18 07:12:52

MSNBC

+2
bad

reply
Bob S to Aksana 2012/06/21 16:58:34

+2
They remind me of the Jim Carrey movie...dumb dumb and dummer.

reply
Bob S to Bob S 2012/06/29 18:10:02

That would be Schultz, Matthews and the Rev (ha ha)

reply
'Zedd 2012/06/18 01:44:04
gaylehelen 2012/06/17 23:24:03

Both are bad

+3
I use multiple sources when I'm really interested in a news story. You'd be amazed at the difference in information one source to the next. One will omit information, another says something else, that sort of thing. No one should depend on one source.

reply
DFA to gaylehelen 2012/06/17 23:25:09

reply
gaylehelen to DFA 2012/06/24 22:34:41

Thanks.

reply